The debate over ecotourism's success as a tool for conservation and development in the developing world is aggravated by the dispute over what exactly ecotourism is. The International Ecotourism Society offers a succinct and often cited definition: “responsible travel to natural areas that conserves the environment and improves the well-being of local people” (TIES). Ecotourism is often tied to the concept of sustainable development. “Sustainable tourism development meets the needs of present tourists and host regions while protecting and enhancing opportunities for the future” (WTOa).
As the notion of ecotourism gained popularity, Boo (1990) was one of the first to express reservations over ecotourism's potential. She warned that it should not be viewed as a harmless alternative to mass-tourism and pointed out its possible dangers. The research that followed was mostly critical of ecotourism and not focused on highlighting any success.
Honey (1999) provides a recent, objective and comprehensive look at the realities of ecotourism and its place in a broader development strategy. Measuring ecotourism is difficult because it is often lumped together with nature, wildlife and adventure tourism. “Much of what is marketed as ecotourism is simply mass tourism wrapped in a thin green veneer” (Honey 1999: 51) a concept referred to “ecotourism lite.” Acott and La Trobe (1998) refer to the same phenomenon as “shallow ecotourism.” They provide a conceptual framework for measuring whether an ecotourism venture is a sincere attempt at sustainability and conservation or if it is simply an exploited term. Ecotourists and their impacts are measured on a continuum ranging from shallow ecotourism to deep ecotourism. Shallow ecotourism differs little from conventional tourism except in its marketing, and deep ecotourism is that in which decisions are made from a biocentric, not anthropogenic, nature. Deep ecotourism views nature as having an intrinsic value.
Ecotourism can be played out on three different stages though they are often not exclusive. Government protected areas, private reserves, and Community Based Ecotourism (CBET) ventures can all host visitors. Government protected areas are typically national parks or reserves which are often established because there is economic justification in doing so. Tourists attracted to the park are wo...
... middle of paper ...
...any of the ingredients of an ecotourism hotspot. It ranks eighth in international tourist arrivals (WTOb), has a host of historic and natural wonders, and already has an existing mass-tourism infrastructure. However, political and financial instability deter a number of tourists and would be tourism investors. This phenomenon is not isolated to Mexico. “Whatever the specific problems within developing countries, tourism will not necessarily wait for them to be sorted out; it will simply move elsewhere” (Cothran and Cothran 1998: 494).
The success of ecotourism is dependent on the political, economic and social situations in each country. Any improvements in current practices will take us one step closer to global sustainability; a notion in its infancy. Much of the recent literature is critical of ecotourism as a viable sustainability practice but is so while implying ecotourism is seen as a panacea for sustainability. None of the recent literature makes this claim. The time has come for a shift in the paradigm. Research should now focus on small successes toward sustainability, conservation and local economic success and how they can be placed in a broader development strategy.
This aspect is “The Double-edged Sword of Ecotourism.” In this chapter, Stanford expresses the positives and negatives of ecotourism. Ecotourism is a form of tourism which involves visiting fragile and undisturbed natural areas and in this case, the main reason is to see gorillas. Ecotourism has its good and bad. It is good because those poor communities that live close to the habitats of the apes can have a source of revenue. Those areas are really poor, and with ecotourism, they can earn about $9000 dollars a month. However, those areas may not exactly be the safest. Stanford cites a 1999 cross border attack by rebel groups in Rwanda in which 8 ecotourists were murdered and this attack deterred tourist from going there for many months. Another negative aspect of ecotourism is how it affects the apes. Although, many apes who do live in these areas of habituation and have tourists coming in and out, the apes develop really high stress levels. When humans move too quickly or make loud noises, the apes are stressed out and can flee. Not only that, but increased stress levels lowers their immune systems making them more susceptible to disease. Stanford ends this chapter saying that ecotourism is bound to happen if the countries are too poor to provide for their people and that “the apes will have to live with the results” (190). In
The current organizational chart shown in the text implied that the Production Superintendents supervised three people each, totaling six. I do not believe that six people is too much for the Manager of Production to handle on his own, so the span of control, as discussed in chapter four,
In many South American countries, there is a program in effect called Ecotourism. When the idea was initially though of, many of the developing countries of South America, had very poor economies as well as many suffering people. To act as a means of improving the status of these poor countries, the idea of Ecotourism was developed. In essence, Ecotourism is a program that permits tourists to visit and explore countries in South America while contributing their foreign capital to local economies. For the tourist, this is a great opportunity to see places of the world that have not been destroyed or inhabited by many. Though the idea of Ecotourism was one with good intentions, the local people in the countries where Ecotourism has been in effect are not gaining much at all. For this reason, I do not think that Ecotourism should be a continuing program in these countries. If the native people (whose best interest was at heart initially) are not benefiting from Ecotourism, then why has it been allowed to exist? The answer is simple: greed and selfishness.
Tourism is a leading activity in Mexico and a good source of revenue but for the Tzotzil people, they haven’t entirely benefited from increased tourism in their region. Due to globalization, tourists usually come with a pre-paid trip
Neth, B., 2008. Ecotourism as a Tool for Sustainable Rural Community Development and Natural Resources Management in the Tonle Sap Biosphere Researve. Kassel: Kassel University Press GmbH,
Police violence remains a dire human right violation, especially in the United States. Over the last decade, police have applied force and aggression in ways that leave people wondering if they are discharging their duties. Recently, law enforcement seems to have taken a different turn characterized by aggression and violence when dealing with the public. Cases of unjustified shootings, physical assault, fatal chokings and violent treatment have contributed to the ongoing problem of police brutality in the America. Worse still is the fact that a greater proportion of these cases go unreported and undetected. This has partially encouraged violent police officers to continue applying force when dealing with the public. This new law enforcement
On the first day I was in middle school, the teacher let every student introduce him/herself. I was so excited to let others know me. When it was my turn, I went up and started introducing myself and sharing my stories. Students were interested in and concentrate on what I was saying. However, when I talked about my hobbies, a lot of students were laughing and seem thought I was unreasonable. I said my hobbies were shooting game and making building models. At that time I feel disappoint and sad because I didn’t know what’s wrong with my hobbies and why students laughed at
The article provides checklists to see whether or not it is ecotourism, with some key features being the companies relationship to the natives, if they act for convince or for nature, and if they are a certified ectourism company. The authors also talk of the consequences of ecotourism by exemplifying the Galapagos Islands boom in “ecotourism” as a negative impact that brought invasive plants, animals, and even pirates to the islands. They then point at the path to a solution for the Galapagos Islands through legislation, tour design and interpretation, and lessening their environmental impact. McElrath, Kolby. 17 February 2016.
In other words, ecotourism is a form of support where tourists can easily observe the endangered habitats which are risking the survival of many species who roam the area and the population. This can potentially be an eye opener to make people realize action needs to be taken
The research study examined potential benefits of ecotourism on the environment in Australia. Using one group pre post-test design, the authors collected information about attitudes, knowledge and behaviors of tourists through surveys. The results showed a significantly positive link between ecotourism activities and indirect environmental benefits such as improved awareness, attitudes and behaviors. As a result, the author suggests that ecotourism activities can be used to educate visitors about sustainable preservation.
Some of the tourism products include: sun and beach, culture, nature, conventions, and recreational tourism with a general objective to increase tourists spending and length of stay, increase number of tourists that visit each year, and to diversify the destinations to attract other tourists. Most visitors come from the U.S. followed by Canada, Argentina, Colombia, United Kingdom, Brazil, Spain, Germany and France. Two straight years of record growth in Mexico’s tourism industry have coagulated importance as a in ideal for economic growth. According to Ministry of Tourism, tourism contributes over 8.7 percent to Mexico’s GDP and employs 3.6 million people, and it is the fourth most important source of foreign currency. “Revenues generated from international arrivals reached a record 16.2 billion, increase of 16.1 percent from 2013.
The book is written by three authors, Martin Mowforth, Clive Charlton and Ian Munt. Martin Mowforth is a part timer lecturer while Clive Charlton is a principal lecturer and helps to solve the problems of environment, transport, tourism and development. Ian Munt is a consultant and worked on various types of projects over the world. The book is published on year 2008, with the title of “Tourism and Responsibility” which focuses on the nature, ecotourism and ‘sustainability’ upon the recognition of the social dimension of tourism. Besides, the book mentioned the responsibility and the activities occurred in Latin America and Caribbean. The issues happened in the country also discussed in the book such as the problem of the poverty. Authors also
The National Ecotourism Plan was prepared by MOCAT in 1997, consisting of 25 guidelines among other matters. It covers the aspects of categorizing sites and activities, carrying capacity and limits of acceptable change, marine parks and islands, national parks and reserves, use of local accomodation, accreditation of ecotourism products, and visitors’ roles and responsibilities among many others.
In 21st century, the ecology and environment become more and more important due to the pollution make by human. Human daily activity such as industrial, agriculture and tourism has increase the pollution level of ecology and environment. To maintain our ecology and environment, conservation should be implemented. There is two ways to conserve. One is through responsible tourism and the other is though ecotourism.
Belsoy, J. 2012, ‘Environmental Impacts of Tourism in Protected Areas’, Journal of Environmental and Earth Science, vol. 2, pp. 10.