Film Analysis Of The Movie 'Chinatown'

1588 Words4 Pages

Chinatown is regarded by many as one of the best films ever created. In 2007, The American Film Institute named “Chinatown” as #21 on their list of 100 greatest films! Chinatown is a great film because it is able to show how far people are willing to go to obtain riches and how a detective is willing to go to great lengths to solve the mysteries in front of him. The movie has been talked about in abundance and has even been influenced by real life events from the water company in Los Angeles. It is closely related to corruption and the 1% which people still talk about till this day. In the movie “Chinatown” directed by Roman Polanski, a private detective hired to expose an adulterer finds that he is caught up in a web of deceit, corruption, and murder. Somewhat relating to this is the article “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%” written by Joseph E. Stiglitz. In the article Stiglitz writes about how democracy in America is a mirage and that the rich …show more content…

The main antagonist in the movie, Noah Cross, is shown to not care about others. Even his own daughter is not important enough to change his views and morals. In the movie, Cross is able to get away with irrigating water away from farms so the farmers lose money and eventually have to sell the land for cheap. When asked about this from the main character Jake Gittes, Cross obviously denies anything negative is happening. Gittes, bewildered, expresses his concerns by saying “Why are you doing it? How much better can you eat? What could you buy that you can't already afford?” (122). Cross replies with the vague expression “The future, Mr. Gittes -- the future” (123). Even though he is ruining the lives of others, he not even phased by anything but his own self-interest. His behavior is absolutely diabolical. . Stiglitz sheds light on this by showing

Open Document