More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of women in general literature
Role of women in general literature
Gender and roles of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Just because two things have something in common does not mean that they are the same. Linda M. Hasselstrom’s story is about the events that led up to her deciding that she needs to carry a gun. Max Brooks’ writing tells readers about the history of zombies and their growing popularity. Both of these writings explain the causes of specific events, Hasselstrom deciding to carry a gun and why zombies are so popular. These two pieces of writing, Linda M. Hasselstrom’s “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries a Gun” and Max Brooks’ “The Movies That Rose from the Grave”, differ in information, format, and purpose. In the short story “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries a Gun” by Hasselstrom, she informs the readers about her choice to carry a gun and what led up to making this choice. Hasselstrom tells her readers that she is a female who lives and travels alone. She says that “a woman who travels alone is advised, usually by men, to protect herself” (3). Women are seen as easy targets and are told to take extra precautions to make sure that she is safe. Hasselstrom hates that just because she is female she will need to do extra in order to …show more content…
The first sentence of her story is, “I am a peace-loving woman” (1). Hasselstrom needs to justify her decision because she knows that she is a peaceful person and carrying a gun is not considered peaceful. She justifies this non-peaceful decision by talking about different events that have caused her to feel threatened and have jeopardized her safety. She talks about events such as being followed, finding a man with a gun on her property, and coming home to her house being open and a light on. These events along with others made Hasselstrom want to protect herself and so she decided on carrying a gun. While Hasselstrom’s purpose was to justify her need of a gun, Brooks’ purpose was to educate and inform
For a long time she wanted to deny any existence of 'evils ' (a term she made for killers). When her husband died as an American sniper, she felt the need to own a gun. Her views on guns are mixed, but she is a firm believer in the second amendment (Kyle ¶1-3). "A mere 27 words in the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights somehow manage to incite some of the most heated and occasionally violent debates over two centuries after its drafting ("Right" ¶1). Gun owners cherish their freedom to guns. It is a sense of protection that the government has allowed us to have. Gun control, in no way, takes away that freedom; it simply limits certain rights for everyone 's safety ("Urbanism"
Max Brooks explains in his article ‘’The Movies That Rose From The Grave’’ [2006], that zombies and the supernatural forces have impacted and have become popular in the world today. The first main idea that Brooks points out is the way society has changed the meaning and glimpse for the supernatural creatures like zombies causing them to become increasingly popular. To support this zombie movies have changed from darkness and mystery to violent and bloodier scenes therefore making them more prevailing. The second main idea that is discussed by Brooks is how the media has helped to increase the popularity of zombies, vampires, ghosts. Highlighted by the author particularity both ‘’resident evil,
If a woman was raised to protect her self and to fend for herself, then she is less of a target. If a woman was raised to depend on others for everything, then she is more of a target. Silko told her readers how she was raised to protect herself. Her father took her to the river and taught her how to shoot guns in order to defend herself. Being raised to defend herself paid off when the man followed her to the pet store. She was not afraid because she knew how to defend herself with her gun and that scared him away. If a woman was raised to depend on other people, then they depend on the state to keep them safe. They depend on the police enforcing the law and mandatory
Many people have heard that having a gun makes you a man, so Dave believes that purchasing a gun would help him become one. The gun represents power, masculinity, independence, and respect, which are all things that Dave wants. The idea of owning a gun is David’s outlet, a way to quickly become more powerful and manly. The feeling of having a gun in his possession was to prevent others around him from looking at him as just a little boy. With the gun, Dave felt invincible, as if no harm could come his way and as if he is on top of the
As said in the previous discussion regarding the second chapter of Better Off Dead: The Evolution of the Zombie as Post-Human, zombies and their culture are examined and broken down in order to understand their motives for the progression of zombies globally. Through different perspectives from individuals based around the world, the discussion of the zombie culture debates over the idea that zombies have not just evolved within the narratives that have brought them to life, but they have evolved in such a way that ultimately transforms the narrative itself. However, in this specific chapter, “They are not men.they are dead bodies!” : From Cannibal to Zombie and Back Again, Chera Kee breaks down the introduction of zombies into mainstream consciousness, and eventually cinema.
The excerpt of “A Peaceful Woman Explains Why She Carries A Gun” is a personal account from Linda Hasselstrom on why she feels the need to carry a gun as well as, why other women should feel the need to own a gun. Hasselstrom uses rhetorical appeals in order to justify her means of security, however she fails due to her inability to provide a substantial amount of background knowledge.
Linda says in her story, “I am a peace-loving woman.” Yet after she has her concealed weapon she claims, “In my car it’s within instant reach. When I enter a deserted rest stop at night, it’s in my purse, with my hand on the grip. When I walk from a dark parking lot into a motel, it’s in my hand, under a coat.” How can Linda be a peace-loving woman when she has her gun in hand most of the time? In a class that one takes to be permitted to carry a concealed weapon, they are taught that the weapon is a last resort tool. A gun is for emergency use only, like a fire extinguisher. And yet Linda Hasselstrom claims to have it in hand even when she isn’t being directly threatened. She is misusing her weapon by choosing it as a first and only option
Self-protection is one of the most common reasons for wanting to own firearms. Anti-gun control activists believe that they have the right to protect their family and their homes, two of the most important things in life (A man's home is his castle). An unknown author said, "A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.
Now more than ever the increase of in school massacres are starting to become more evident. The Sandy Hook and Oregon shootings are sending people searching for a way to keep their children safe when they are away from home receiving an education. This poses an issue, some people see it is fit for teachers to be armed with a gun in case of future attacks on the school. The outcome that will follow from arming teachers will be negative, but there is a solution that involves the protection of students without handing guns over to teachers.
When looking at gun control laws through a functionalist paradigm we have to look at how having more gun control laws and not having gun control laws will effect the people that use them. Functionalist theory “interprets each part of society in terms of how it contributes to the stability of the whole society” (Crossman). This means that when looking at something though this perspective you have to also look at all of the different possibilities that could result from a certain change. There are multiple ways you can look at gun control though a functionalist perspective. One way would be to look at how this could effect people is by looking at how having stricter gun laws will effect people, as compared to not having has strict gun laws. By not having stricter gun laws people will be able to assert their amendment right to buy a gun, but this can lead to more people being able to get guns that should not haven them.
This is mostly when a woman goes out at night or darkness finds her far and she is not in company of a man. When this one happens, violent criminals may harm them. They need to always stay safe and away from any violent stranger. “An individual woman may be terrorized by her spouse, but women are not sufficiently terrorized that we avoid marriage. Yet many women I know, including myself, try to avoid going outside of their homes alone after dark. Big deal, you say; well, yes, it is a big deal since most lectures, performances, and films are presented at night; so are dinners and other social events. Women out alone at night who are assaulted by strangers are put on trial by public opinion: Any woman out alone after dark is asking for trouble. Presently, for millions of women of all socioeconomic backgrounds, sundown is lockdown. We are prisoners of violent strangers” (Silko
In"Get a Knife, Get a dog, but Get Rid of Gun," Molly Ivins argues on gun control laws and how guns should be banned or restricted to some people. In the essay she argues how knife is more safer than guns to use, because more likely people die from cleaning or using guns in wrong way. Author main purpose is to let people know guns is danger, and should be ban. She also points out the 2nd amendment and it says clearly that guns are for those who form part of a well-regulated militia, that is armed forced, including the National Guard. I agree with Ivins about the guns control, because guns is for special training people only, and private citizens shouldn't have gun, also we don’t need to hunt for food to survive and killing innocent animal just for fun.
They use a lot of information that is overwhelming, and does not add a lot of validity to the point they were trying to make. Throughout the article, the authors take from various other zombie pieces, such as movies, books, and TV shows and use them to add to their ideas. In some cases, they also use other pieces and discredit them as a way to prove their own point. For example, they talk about the “Cyborg Manifesto” by Donna Haraway. This essay presents the idea of the cyborg, which is an organism that is part human and part machine. Throughout the essay, Haraway gives examples of where we see the cyborg throughout media, and how humans might be connected to it. The authors in “A Zombie Manifesto” stated how they were influenced to title their piece after her, but they go on throughout the essay constantly trying to prove the piece wrong. They argue that the idea Haraway is presenting is not truly what humans connect to, and the authors think their ideas are more relatable. They believe their zombie interpretation is more relatable than Haraway’s cyborg interpretation. The authors are trying to make their interpretation more valid by invalidating another interpretation. This makes the piece hard to agree with, for an interpretation is relative to each person, and tearing apart another interpretation is an unproductive way to persuade readers to agree with you and your ideas. Another reason the article is difficult to agree with, is the fact that it is very difficult to understand. With the piece being as persuasive as it is, the authors did not take the time to ensure the writing would be easy to understand for all. In reading the article, it felt as though the authors had a specific group of readers in mind and didn’t accommodate to others who might find interest in zombies. The article is written in such a way
What is the need for gun control? The necessity of gun control is one of the most debatable topics today, and one of the reason for gun control is to get the guns out of the wrong hands. 33 million Americans own firearms for hunting, but hunting is not the sole reason for which many citizens of America purchase firearms. Of all countries, the United States is one of the top countries that is troubled by a large number of criminals who are in possession of guns even without registrations. According to the FBI report for the year 2013 the amount of murders (not counting robberies or any other violent crimes that involved firearms) in that year alone added up to 8,454, and for the year 2014 the amount rose to 9,275. That is an 821 point increase
Hasselstrom. In this essay the author, a pacifist, explains why she feels the need to carry a gun. She begins by describing her line of work as a freelance writer and the isolated area she lives in. She then goes on to recall events from the past years where she has felt threaten or unsafe. One such incident was a camping trip she took with her friend where fellow campers made them feel uncomfortable. Another event was that of a woman who had car troubles, she called for help but reached a rapist who assaulted her. The author continues to recall more personal incidents such as being followed by men who harassed her on a narrow bridge, another man with a shotgun who made her realize how isolated her ranch was, and one evening when a light was on in her home. These events prompted her to learn Kung Fu, yet she still felt unsafe and decided on carrying a gun. Despite being hesitant at first to carry a gun it has proven to be the best deterrent when faced with a threatening situation, simply showing the gun has been enough to protect