Comparing The Lottery And The Book Thief

859 Words2 Pages

Former President John F. Kennedy once said, “Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth.” The history of mankind contains numerous leaders and guiding principles that carry beliefs contrary to those of our natural law yet still gather an extreme following of individuals. The question is why. Why do people leave their good moral at the door in order to follow the masses? Risk their individuality, freedom, and personality to appeal to others. “The Lottery” and The Book Thief both explore the concept of conformity as it pertains to the individual and how far away one is willing to stray from the path of moral freedom to bend to the will of others. “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson depicts small town gathering for their annual lottery …show more content…

The Book Thief by Markus Zusak redefines death and his perspective of the human world by following Liesel Meminger, a young German girl who loses her father, brother, and mother and has to rebuild herself in Molching of Nazi, Germany. The Book Thief exposes the measures taken to spark early approval of Hitler in the young children of Germany and mirrors methods some use today to mold a child into what is desired or expected. Though these stories were written with contrasting purposes in mind, “The Lottery” and The Book Thief both showcase the human habit to blindly follow traditions or leaders and the early corruption of young minds that sparks lifelong …show more content…

Jackson’s story is laced with insight referring to humankind’s inclination to revere tradition, despite one’s best instincts, because of the history it holds together. Jackson portrays an example of such when she writes “The people had done it so many times that they only half listened to the directions” (Jackson 3). Through this line, the reader uncovers that the people of the town were only going through the motions of the lottery. Showing that for the past however many years, the citizens of the town have not even been reflecting on the purpose of their tradition, but rather halfheartedly participating like a child sitting through a long political broadcast. Should that not be a sign flashing in bright lights that their beloved tradition was morally wrong? The people’s disengagement with the lottery serves as a clue to readers that they do not understand, in their hearts, what they are doing; some could even argue that perhaps they have put up a wall in order to prevent the truth from breaking to the surface. Similarly, Jackson emphasizes the length of time the lottery has claimed the lives of the townspeople when Old Man Warner says, “There’s always been a lottery,” (4). In this line Old Man Warner rebukes the other towns decisions to quit the lottery by suggesting that the lotteries age is a valid enough reason to

Open Document