Compare And Contrast Belbin And Tuckman's Theory

667 Words2 Pages

The theories I have studied are by Belbin and Tuckman. Belbin believed in team roles and thought an ideal team would consist of nine people, each with a role. I believe this theory works well to some extent as everyone within the team will hold a role and the other members within the team will know one another’s roles, this will decrease confusion in the team and allow them to work towards the goal in an effective manner, also by everyone having their own role they can work on their role and bring their work back to the team in order to discuss. I believe that Belbin’s theory is a well thought out theory and would work well if a team always consisted of nine people but realistically it doesn’t. Sometimes a team can consist of three or less …show more content…

Sometimes teams are only temporary so they cannot move on to each stage as they have to keep forming new teams, also some people within a team may not get on and this will cause the team to stay on the storming stage and not allow them to proceed onto the norming stage. Also, within the team when moving on to the next stage it may be unclear to all of the team members which stage they are at while in the team. Furthermore, within the forming stage Tuckman believes that most people when forming a team don’t show their true personality and just stay quiet as they are getting to know the group however this isn’t always the case as sometimes a team may include someone who is confident and not afraid to voice their opinion, this could be a disadvantage to Tuckman’s theory because if there is a confident person within the team who challenges others ideas there may be conflict within the group and this would prevent them from moving on to the next stage. This theory influences my practice as I understand that a team needs to complete stages in order to be successful however sometimes it is easier said than done, however, personally I will listen to others ideas and if I don’t agree with someone I will ask them about their idea in order to try and get an understanding, I wouldn’t criticise their idea because I believe this causes bad relationships and distracts the team from reaching their

Open Document