Boudicca Symbolism

1119 Words3 Pages

Great leaders undergo reinvention throughout different periods in history, and Boudicca is no exception. The fluidity of her persona is manipulated frequently, but one of the common recurring themes is male discomfort with her extension of gender boundaries. However, fighting against this is the feminist interpretation of her as being somewhat superhuman. This image is often integrated with some of the lighter parts of the violent and vengeful description of Boudicca, while the darker sections were left to the Romans. Finally, there is the vastly different image of Boudicca’s romantic representation, which obscured many of her war-like traits in order to conform to Victorian ideals.
In male dominated societies, Boudicca is often interpreted negatively, due to the masculine perspective of her going against gender norms being unnatural. This began with the Roman authors Dio Cassius and Tacitus, the only two early sources on Boudicca. Tacitus viewed Boudicca’s leadership as a symbol of her savage society, reflecting the negative opinion Romans had of women in their own country. Dio had similar views, as he says that the fact that Rome’s ruin was brought by a woman ‘caused them the greatest shame’. In going on to describe her terrifying stature and fierce demeanour, Roman writing is shown to reduce Boudicca to little more than a barbarian, in order to lessen their discomfort with Boudicca’s defiance of gender stereotypes. Because these are the sole accounts of Boudicca from classical times, this image has continued throughout history. During the rule of James I (1603-25), the first male monarch since Boudicca’s rise in popularity during the Renaissance, people focused on the negative portrayals perpetuated by the Romans. John Flet...

... middle of paper ...

... the ancient queen. This can be seen in the statue of Boudicca and her daughters in Cardiff, as she appears maternal and feminine. Additionally, she is often portrayed in Roman clothing because of the connotations of civility involved, an example of which can be found in her statue in London. Overall, Boudicca’s romanticised image was a product of imperial Victorian ideals and a dismissal of Roman accounts.
In conclusion, images of Boudicca were created to cater to the needs of society at the time. The multiplicity of her character allowed for interpretations spanning everything from feminism to savagery, particularly given the lack of primary sources. These representations were often influenced by the monarchs of the time, and related cultural movements. Thus, exceptional leaders, such as Boudicca, are subjected to a variety of interpretations throughout history.

Open Document