Introduction Films have always fascinated. Films are much more than moving images in succession, or even the story they portray. A good film gives you an experience of the plotline so real, you just cannot help admiring the genius of the director. The history of animation in making films is long and colourful, but not glorious. As a medium of story-telling, it has yet to rise to its potential. Animation needs more popularity, for the creators and their fruit of labour. As a medium, animation offers
Waltz with Bashir (Folman, 2008). The film explores Folman’s journey to recall what his role was in the first Lebanon-Israeli war, through a series of flashbacks and interviews with his former comrades. Folman is reminded of his role in the Sabra and Shatila Massacre when he explores the memories of his own recollections, compiled with those of his comrades. Folman is forced to face a memory he has long since forgotten and blocked out, or so he thought. He has his first flashback 20 years later of falling
think of him this way. In 1982, Sharon invaded Lebanon, and in a short period of time, over ten thousand people were dead. Sharon was found indirectly responsible for these deaths. Sharon was removed from office because of the killings. The Sabra and Shatila Massacres in Lebanon were when hundreds were killed in a refugee camp controlled by a group allied with Israel. Sharon was also held responsible for these killings, and hated for it. Sharon was seen in many different ways. Sharon was often seen as
Proceeding from a simplistic perception of regional stability, Washington utilized the surrogate strategy to control the outcomes of regional interactions in the Middle East and chose Israel to play the role of regional surrogate. But Israel, in many cases, instead of maintaining regional stability on behalf of the US, served its own interests which were not always consistent with US interest in regional stability. The Israeli violations, however, were either condoned or even approved by the US administrations
instead he quietly shuts himself inside his house neglecting his wellbeing and finds liberation in her death since he can leave all of Lebanon behind. Additionally, Bassam reacts to George’s retelling of the massacre in an unconventional way as well. Bassam doesn’t care or is shocked about the massacre, but rather is more focused on trying to escape out of the conversation. However, later on Bassam laughs at the absurdity of this statement from L'Étranger, not because it is unreasonable or unusual, but
novels have stemmed. Take, for example, two separate works by Art Spiegelman and Ari Folman. Whereas Spiegelman’s Maus recounts a survivor’s story of the Holocaust, Folman’s Waltz with Bashir instead retraces a soldier’s connection to the Sabra and Shatila massacre after decades of repression. Though stylistically distinguishable in content and presentation, both texts nevertheless approach their material through the same visual medium, juxtaposing historical instances of trauma through graphic representations
As documentary by its very nature introduces itself as factual, concerns exist as to where the boundary between the truth of subject and the fiction produced by its creator emerges. As anything that has been edited has by definition removed certain aspects and enhanced others, there must be at best an innocent naturally occurring bias formed from individual perception, and at worst purposefully manipulated misinformation. Through researching various sources, I intend to discover the difference (if
Agreement was the sparkle that end the war. In conclusion, Lebanon civil war is a vary complex that last for all most 15 years. This war was a war of religion and sectors. The war had been through four major phases, first is the Sectarian violence and massacres, and second on was a continuing of the first phases and the begging of the third one. Third phases, was the Israeli invasion of Lebanon. The fourth phase and the last one was the pace phase. In the end, Syria had a major role in Lebanon.
'Pirates and Emperors' by Noam Chomsky “St. Augustine tells the story of a pirate captured by Alexander the Great. "How dare you molest the sea?" asked Alexander. "How dare you molest the whole world?" the pirate replied. "Because I do it with a little ship only, I am called a thief; you, doing it with a great navy, are called an emperor."[1] This extract from Noam Chomsky’s book ‘Pirates and Emperors’ highlights the relativity of terms and labels, showing how different viewpoints result