Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay about relation of past present and future
History and evolution of science
The evolution of science and technology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay about relation of past present and future
Ellis has formed his own theory about what the universe and time must be like. In 2006 he began to formulate his own theory on time and the Universe. The theory he formulated is based on quantum physics rather than relativity, as Einstein’s theory is based on.
“A strange fact about quantum physics is that indeterminate future outcomes are seemingly governed by probabilities in the present. Quantum objects exist in "superpositions" of more than one state until such time as we measure them, when they adopt one or other of their possible forms. The most notorious illustration is Schrödinger's cat: locked in a box with a vial of poison whose seal may or may not be intact, it is simultaneously dead and alive -- until you open the box, when it is most definitely one or the other.”
Ellis says that quantum physics allows for an objectively defined present. The present, in this theory, is the boundary between what our experiments have determined and what remains to be discovered. Ellis says we live on the edge of a “growing block universe”. The surface is what we call the present that leads us one moment as a time as quantum measurements are made. Ellis feels that relativity can also define “now”. He says that Einstein’s theory of relativity is a full view of space-time and that space-time is warped by the presence of gravity. Ellis theorizes that “If we gathered enough data and had a big enough computer, we might take account of all the space-time distortions of all the galaxies, black holes and other matter in the universe to calculate a 3D surface on which each point is exactly the same age as the point where we are.” According to Ellis “Space-time is defined up to then and not beyond,” which means that the future is not set in stone...
... middle of paper ...
..., and without any name, other than duration-which is relative, apparent and a form of “time” that is sensible. Time in nature does not care how humans define or interpret it. We know that time cannot be “measured” because there is nothing of value to measure, but we know that the earth continues to spin and the sun continues to set and rise, and as humans we have turned those truths about the universe into measurable natural systems that we use to help us function as a society. The beauty of being human is that we can think, conceptualize and create. Mathematically, psychologically, and philosophically time has always been a subject of interest, and though it can be difficult to define and understand it is always around us in the form of a concept. Our society would function completely different without the subjective and objective forms of time we use every day.
If you have ever read Einstein's Dreams, you can appreciate my dilemma. If you have not yet had the opportunity to experience this wonderful novel by Alan Lightman, I guarantee that after you read it you will expand your perception of the nature of time and of human activity. The novel is enchanting. It is a fictional account of what one of the greatest scientific minds dreams as he begins to uncover his theory of relativity.
it was his illusion of his ideal future that made time a key dimension in
Well Erwin Schrodinger was a scientist who did an experiment on his cat (“The Mandela Effect” 2). He placed his cat in a steel box, along with a device containing a vial of hydrocyanic acid. Which would cause a wave of two simultaneous macro scale realities. According to quantum law the cat appears in two states, dead and alive (“The Mandela Effect” 2). Once you break open the box the cat will either be dead or alive (“The Mandela Effect” 3).
John McTaggart in his essay “Time” presents a radical argument that claims time is unreal. While the argument is interesting and has attracted much attention for his arguments, I remain unconvinced of the argument he makes. This paper will lay out McTaggart’s argument that time in unreal, critically analyze why I believe McTaggart’s argument fails and present an alternative idea about time, utilizing aspects of McTaggart’s argument.
McTaggart takes a bold step in trying to disprove the existence of a phenomenon as taken for granted and unquestioned as breathing when he tackles the issue of time. If for no other reason, this quest is extremely daring in its scope, because he chooses to question an entity whose reality has probably never crossed most people’s minds.
In this essay we will consider a much more recent approach to time that came to the fore in the twentieth century. In 1908 James McTaggart published an article in Mind entitled 'The Unreality of Time', in which, as the title implies, he argued that there is in reality no such thing as time. Now although this claim was in itself startling, probably what was even more significant than McTaggart's arguments was his way of stating them. It was in this paper that McTaggart first drew his now standard distinction between two ways of saying when things happen. In this essay we shall outline these ways of describing events and then discuss the merits and demerits of each, and examine what has become known as the 'tensed versus tenseless' debate on temporal becoming.
Quantum Mechanics This chapter compares the theory of general relativity and quantum mechanics. It shows that relativity mainly concerns that microscopic world, while quantum mechanics deals with the microscopic world.
The universe is composed of several different properties. These properties include space and time. Space is a three-dimensional representation of everything around us and that we observe, and that occurs. Space allows objects to have lengths left and right, up and down, and forwards and backwards. Time, however, is a bit different. Time is a fourth dimension. We use time as a measurement between events. But, time is much more than that. It isn’t just a tool but it is a necessity of physical existence. So, with space and time combined, it gives us a four-dimensional concept.
Einstein establishes an inertial reference, where Newton’s laws hold. He calls this the “stationary frame.” He defines the position through standard Euclidean geometry using Cartesian coordinates. Motion is defined as the change in the coordinates according to the time. But what do we mean by time? He proposes a thought experimen...
Time is the most elusive physical element. Despite familiarity with the concept, time is difficult to describe. Time is always the underlying assumption in our descriptions of the universe. In physics, it remains the largest barrier to the unification of relativity and quantum theory; some physicists believe time will have to be dismissed altogether if that unification is to occur (1). In more common experience, time appears to be an immutable and often lamented truth; who hasn't wished to "have more time," or to be able to "go back and do it over?"
The scientific definition of time is a measurement of progress that is relative to an individual’s perception of events (HowStuffWorks.com, 2010). A psychological study proves that these viewpoints are
Philosophers are divided on the ontological question of the reality of the past, present and future. While nearly all contemporary philosophers agree that the present time exists, there has been substantial disagreement over the existence of the past and future. In this essay I will argue that it is not that case that only the present time exists. I will argue that conclusion by discussing the ideas put forward by Presentists. This will then be contrasted with the ideas given by Eternalists, with a brief look at the Growing Block Theory.
This paper examines how such fundamental notions as causality and determinism have undergone changes as a direct result of empirical discoveries. Although such notions are often regarded as metaphysical or a priori concepts, experimental discoveries at the beginning of this century—radioactive decay, blackbody radiation and spontaneous emission—led to a direct questioning of the notions of causality and determinism. Experimental evidence suggests that these two notions must be separated. Causality and indeterminism are compatible with the behavior of quantum-mechanical systems. The argument also sheds some light on the Duhem-Quine thesis, since experimental results at the periphery of the conceptual scheme directly affect conceptions at the very core.
possibilities be? The ideas presented in this story are very entertaining and imaginative. From what I gathered while researching this novel and the time period in which it was written, the author, H.G. Wells, incorporated new ideas about science and physics into this story. It is not hard to see why this story is considered classic science fiction more than one hundred years after it was first published. This story is great because it sparks your imagination and persuades you to consider the mysteries of science and time travel.
For many years time travel was the stuff of science fiction. This was all just part of the world’s imagination until recently. Scientists now believe that the current laws of physics allow us to travel though time. They believe that we can now travel back to see our founding fathers sign the declaration of independence. We could travel to 2999 to witness the birth of the next new millennium. Such travel would require a machine capable of withstanding great pressures and incredible amounts of speed. The act of actually traveling though time is for the most part, agreed upon, but the implications of such travel is not so decided upon. Many different theorists have different views of what could happen and some go, as far as to say that if we did travel to the past, we would end up in a different universe that is a replica of this one. One of the most basic concepts is that of Dilation, a stretching of something. Some scientists believe that the main gateway to the past or future is a wormhole. Einstein’s general relativity theory explains about universal constants, this is important to understand the concepts of travel at light speed. Traveling to the past could create problems if someone tried to change something. This is a paradox. A few of these paradoxes are explained through the use of quantum mechanics. Sailing though the cosmos at the speed of light with no time passing us by, moving throughout time to witness the ancient Egyptians create their masterpieces. This is an exciting concept that we could actually formulate and make happen.