Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Global brands contribution to global business
Global branding strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
1
'Taking A Brand Global: Ten Steps To Success';
I. Introduction: The Importance of Being Global
A strong global brand is a powerful weapon. These days, however, it may also be an indispensable one, even as the economy challenges our faith in brands to deliver a profit.
According to Interbrand's 'World's Most Valuable Brands 2000'; study, for example, although
Amazon's share price has declined, its brand value has increased by 233%. On the other hand, international power player Coca-Cola, although still the world's #1 brand, saw its value drop by 13%. And technology brands did quite well— Microsoft, IBM, Intel, and Nokia placed second through fifth—not at all foreshadowing the precipitous crash in their stock prices about half a year after the study findings were released. Overall, notes marketing writer Jane
Bainbridge in Marketing [20 July 2000], Interbrand's second annual study of this kind reveals not only that global brands are 'stable assets,'; but also that 'the most valuable brands are global.'; In fact, she argues, 'to have a billion-dollar brand, a company has to be global.';
II. Branding As The New 'Universal Language';
Based on a recent survey of more than forty-five thousand people across nineteen countries,
Young & Rubicam makes a rather startling claim. In its newest Brand Asset Valuator report, issued in March 2001, the firm asserts that brands have taken on a godlike status: consumers find greater meaning in them and the values they espouse than in religion. As Conor Dignam reports in Ad Age Global [12 March 2001], the study claims that superbrands like Calvin Klein,
Gatorade, IKEA, Microsoft, MTV, Nike, Virgin, Sony PlayStation, and Yahoo! can therefore also be called 'belief brands.'; Although Dignam argues against the idea that consumers would treat brands as gods (because they will not be dictated to by them), he does accept the implications of the argument and make a different analogy. Brands, he says, are more like
'best friends,'; in that they are an important part of people's lives, do carry specific meanings for the consumer, and they are respected or rejected based on how well they keep their promises. Yet whether one calls them gods or 'best friends,'; brands have clearly started to take on greater importance in consumers' lives. In fact, they have gone from objects with identity to identities in the guise of objects.
The trend has gone so far, in fact, that people are beginning to speak the language of brands and even to market themselves as brands in their own right. There is more than one book in print along the lines of Brand Yourself [Ballantine, 2000] devoted strictly to the notion that the
progresses, we begin to perceive how ads for Nike, Calvin Klein, Oil of Olay, and Suzuki are selling more
When people go shopping there are limitless choices of one product made by different companies, all choices of this product basically do the same thing, but what makes them different is the brand’s name. Companies with brands are trying to get their consumers by presenting their commodities in ways
This argument is supported by Solomon (1992) with him discovering that purchase decision that is based on loyalty might become a habit which leads to brand equity. On the other hand, Aaker (1991) described brand loyalty as consumer’s mentality toward a brand that drives them to consistently purchase the same brand. As per Yoo (2000), brand loyalty has the ability to affect consumer choice to buy a same product or brand and cease to switch to other brands. Subsequently, Yoo (2000) reasoned out that brand loyalty is the root for brand’s value. Aaker (1991) additionally contended that brand loyalty is a fundamental component used to assess brand’s value due to the fact that brand loyalty can increase profitability. The consumers who are loyal to a brand will not assess the brand, instead they simply purchase it unquestionably based on their experiences with the brand (Sidek, Yee, and yahyah, 2008). The loyal customers bring advantages to a firm by cutting down costs, encouraging easier strategies implementation, providing time for responding to competitions, creating a barrier to entry, increasing sales volume, protecting firm against detrimental pricing and to retain rather than seek for customers (Aaker 1991; Rundle and Bennet, 2001). Loyal customers are also less incline to change to another brand simply because of pricing factor and they purchase more frequently compared to their non-loyal counterparts (Bowen and Shoemaker,
We propose a branding strategy which takes into account the brands capabilities and competencies, strategies of competition brands and the outlook of consumers experience in their respective societies. As an international brand there is the challenge of staying connected with local customers. We will overcome this by adapting marketing strategy to local needs using a variance of standardized marketing mix and an adapted marketing mix.
The source of the brand features is in a connection between customers and companies that sell services or products. Consumers who choose a specific company fundamentally acknowledge to prefer that brand more than other brands rooted from the recognition of the brand’s worth.
[a] company may have a unique vision, a superior product, strong management and an efficient distribution system – yet if it is not able to convey the core benefits of the brand to its target audience it will ultimately fail. [5]
Developing a global brand largely depends on the brands’ ability to explore fresh avenues and to sustain its competitive advantages in terms of economies of scale and productivity. A global brand is one which is perceived to reflect the same set of values around the world. A global brand removes the national barriers and linguistic blocks while marketing internationally.
Where there is rapid growth comes increased competition; similarities in products across manufacturers have reduced brand differentiation across the board. The problem now is the severe rise of copycat companies and manufacturers that copy designs and specifications of cars, and proceed to undercut the original manufacturer’s profit margins. So to improve their brand standing, every manufacturer’s individually have resort...
in this segment are often brand conscious and enjoy the latest fads and trends. They...
[1] Aaker, D.A. and Jacobson, R. (1996) Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free Press.
A company’s brand is one of its most valuable assets (Green and Smith 2002). Brands owners invest millions of dollars every year in advertising and promotion to raise awareness and create demand for their brands.
Aaker, D.A., (1991), “Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name”. New York: Free Press. P. 134-140
“Linked to a brand, its name is the symbol that adds to or subtract from the value provided by a product or service.” (Aeler, 1991) Like country of origin, brand equity is also one of the reasons why some people want to have a well-known brands in the whole world. Sometimes it is not all about the price anymore because in today’s generation brand is more important than
...& MAKLAN, S. 2007. The role of brands in a service-dominated world. Journal of Brand Management, 15, 115-122.
The author actually wrote in this article that, “after years of helping companies build their brands, I’m still baffled by the reality that so many smart business people still don’t understand the power of a brand.” At first I was irritated with this statement and worried that the rest of the article would just be egotistical praise on the author and his vast knowledge. I was glad that he recovered and redeemed himself in the next sentence by stating that, “it was the first time [he] realized that the one thing that has the most dramatic impact on the success or failure of a modern-day business is also the least understood.