Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ap gov in recent times aristotle's ideal of democracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The relationship between citizen and state is a complex and highly debated subject throughout history. From Ancient Greece continuing to today, there is no consensus nor agreement as to how citizen and the state should interact. The most important part of the history of citizenship has evolved from Ancient Grecian ideologies as it has affected many governmental systems that are implemented today. The liaison between state and individual is composed of various factors, including how indebted the citizen is to the state, loyalty, and ramifications of disobedience. Socrates is often used as an example in questioning loyalty to the state, just as his following student’s, Plato and Aristotle. However, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle vary greatly in opinion of how an idealized society should be run. The following paper explain the divergences that the intellects had in regards to citizenship and determine which is the most logically applied.
Socrates is often seen as the ideal citizen, but more recently, scholars have found that his loyalty exceeded the necessary amounts and therefore, he believed in extreme obedience and loyalty to the state. Socrates’ writings do in fact show that he was committed to the perfect state, however, depending on the reader, many have decided that his ideologies are not valid due to his utmost commitment to an idealized society. For example, he believed that the youth should not be exposed to ethical doubt until they reach maturity and the capability to discern right from wrong. As mentioned in lectures, he would want all writings to be altered to ensure that a child would not be exposed to the ethical doubt, as it would create a less loyal member to the state. Socrates believed that the youth are vital in ...
... middle of paper ...
...t believe an Absolute is the best type of government as it is unjust. Epicurus, another philosopher had been influenced by many of the previously mentioned philosophers and grew or denounced their ideas respectively. He believed that the “The just person enjoys the greatest peace of mind, while the unjust is full of the utmost disquietude”, just as Cicero stated, that justice is the key to society, which had also been implied or iterated by the preceding philosophers.
It is debated as to what philosopher mentioned above had the right idea of what the relationship between citizen and state should be, as they all have some overlapping ideas, and there is no consensus as to how the relationship should be today as well. The idea of a mixed government that Aristotle had proposed seems to incorporate a lot of themes that others have as well, and so Aristotle would appeal
Alain de Botton commences the section by delineating the story of how Socrates became the figure he became. Socrates lived a lifestyle in which he did things that he thought were correct and did not worry much about approval from society. de Botton states, “every society has notions of what one should believe and how one should behave in order to avoid suspicion and unpopularity” (9). In other words, de Botton believes that society has placed views for people to know what is right and what is wrong. People will submit to conformity by behaving in ways that people will view as “acceptable”.
Socrates refuses to disobey the law. He believes in the correctness of the cities laws. He believes it is never right to act unjustly. He thinks that if you do not agree with the laws of the area that you are living at, then to leave and go somewhere else. He argues that the government could be seen as “his parents, also those who brought him up,” (Crito, 51e), since he has lived there his entire life and when you live somewhere for so long you should “persuade us or to do what we say,” (Crito, 52a) or leave. Socrates tells Crito that
For these two articles that we read in Crito and Apology by Plato, we could know Socrates is an enduring person with imagination, because he presents us with a mass of contradictions: Most eloquent men, yet he never wrote a word; ugliest yet most profoundly attractive; ignorant yet wise; wrongfully convicted, yet unwilling to avoid his unjust execution. Behind these conundrums is a contradiction less often explored: Socrates is at once the most Athenian, most local, citizenly, and patriotic of philosophers; and yet the most self-regarding of Athenians. Exploring that contradiction, between Socrates the loyal Athenian citizen and Socrates the philosophical critic of Athenian society, will help to position Plato's Socrates in an Athenian legal and historical context; it allows us to reunite Socrates the literary character and Athens the democratic city that tried and executed him. Moreover, those help us to understand Plato¡¦s presentation of the strange legal and ethical drama.
A longstanding debate in human history is what to do with power and what is the best way to rule. Who should have power, how should one rule, and what its purpose should government serve have always been questions at the fore in civilization, and more than once have sparked controversy and conflict. The essential elements of rule have placed the human need for order and structure against the human desire for freedom, and compromising between the two has never been easy. It is a question that is still considered and argued to this day. However, the argument has not rested solely with military powers or politicians, but philosophers as well. Two prominent voices in this debate are Plato and Machiavelli, both of whom had very different ideas of government's role in the lives of its people. For Plato, the essential service of government is to allow its citizens to live in their proper places and to do the things that they are best at. In short, Plato's government reinforces the need for order while giving the illusion of freedom. On the other hand, Machiavelli proposes that government's primary concern is to remain intact, thereby preserving stability for the people who live under it. The feature that both philosophers share is that they attempt to compromise between stability and freedom, and in the process admit that neither can be totally had.
Idealists throughout the ages have proposed formulas to solve the problems of societies. These characters in their eagerness to design a harmonized society where all people have their basic needs covered. Many times they have ignored the individual right of people to decide for their future and had their aspirations. These goals of individuals should not be tied to a leader's ambition to achieve a political goal. In this book, we visualize how Socrates was seduced by the idea of formulating a city where there was harmony between social classes. Socrates envisions a healthy state city supported by a government that distributes resources in the justest way. To protect the city, Socrates says that certain citizens should be lied
From the start of his career in government, Pericles provided the Athenian people with the foundations of democracy. In 461, Pericles campaigned against aristocrats sitting in government, and in 451 enforced a law to prevent children of non-citizens from becoming full citizens (PBS, “The Greeks”). By managing the ties that aristocrats often made to other countries, Pericles managed to keep government from being monopolized. Unlike the aristocracy, Pericles focused on the disenfranchised, instructing Athenians to “especially obey those laws enacted for the protection of the oppressed and those which, although unwritten, it is acknowledged shame to violate” (Kagan 166, from Thucydides 2.37.3). Expounding on this social observance of fairness, Pericles most directly gave rights to the Athenians when he made possible “the full participation of its citizens in the government of city and empire” (Robertson 90). This faculty of citizens to have full access to their government provided Athenians with the start of democracy.
(37) The problem is that many of the citizens of Athens who wanted Socrates dead, lacked that emotional intelligence and thought highly of themselves. So of course they become defensive when Socrates sheds light on the idea that they may be wrong. As someone who cared most about the improvement of the soul, Socrates would have made a constructive role model to the criminals of Athens, as he would go on saying, “virtue is not given by money, but that from virtue comes money and every other good of man…”(35) Socrates was able to benefit everyone alike as he had human wisdom- something that all the Athenians could relate
Athenian democracy includes participation of all adult, free, male, citizen, made possible for all. If at the beginning and during the thriving period of the Athens democracy the occupations of a state position was considered to be an worthy duty for the citizens, the taking in of ...
Within the duration of this document, I will be discussing the charges laid against Socrates and how he attempted to refute the charges. One of the reasons why Socrates was arrested was because he was being accused of corrupting the minds of the students he taught. I personally feel that it is almost impossible for one person to corrupt the thoughts and feelings of a whole group of people. Improvement comes from the minority and corruption comes from the majority. Socrates is one man (minority).
Socrates, according to Plato challenged the norms of society by questioning life and having others question it as well. He was labeled of “corrupting the youth” and for not believing in the Athenians gods. “Socrates is guilty of corrupting the young, and of not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, but new daimonic activities instead.” (The Apology, pp 654) Although, he was cast by being “corrupt”, Socrates had many followers that saw him as a wise man. Socrates trial was made up of thirty jurors, who were later known as “The Thirty.” The “Thirty” really wanted was to silence Socrates, rather than taking his life. However, Socrates did not want to disobey the laws, he did not want to be violated of his right to freedom of speech, nor did he did he want to be undermine his moral position. (The Apology, pp. 647) He stood against injustice acts several times while he was in counsel. “I was the sort...
Plato and Aristotle’s philosophies on the best governments are complex though it is possible to separate their opinions and lay out their cities so that it is understandable through topics that they both touch on greatly. Aristotle and Plato considered the different types of government that existed in their time periods and dissected them to understand which ones were the best. From their understanding, they separately decided on the best...
Plato’s thoughts about power and reason are much different than Aristotle. Plato looked at the meaning of justice and different types of governments. Plato looked into four different types of governments
He thought that the election of the people was unfair justice. Plato had some of the same beliefs. He believed that government should only have rulers who had the intelligence and education appropriate for the matter. His thoughts were that a job should be done only by those who are best suited for it. To him, aristocracy was a perfect form of government.
Plato, Aristotle and Machiavelli have spent their lives in assertion of which form of government is good and who should be ruler, what type of ...
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...