Art represent the human nature of the that time. The film “Next Floor” by Denis Villeneuve shows human nature and its effect to “polite” society through the formal dinner setting. The film starts with a dinner party where eleven guests in a contemporary dinner setting. The waiters serves platter after another and the guests continue to eat, caring less about other guests. Also with each plate, the rate of eating increases. As the dinner reaches its peak, a cranking sound heard and the whole floor falls beneath them. The Maitre D speaks into the microphone saying only two words: “next floor” and all the staff runs downstairs to reset the dinner. This continues and the guests keep on falling. Finally, the waitstaff and musicians standby waiting for the guests, but the guest keep falling floor after floor and the movie ends. “Next Floor” demonstrate the violence of “polite” society through the films portrayal of the food and guest behavior ultimately providing a critique of how we use seems like never exhausting natural resources.
“Next Floor” shows how “polite” society uses resources in a violent manner, through the depiction of food which seems like never runs out. The dinner represents “polite” society through guests clothing, environment of dinner with food and wine, and servers who dressed well. Waitstaff continuously serve platters after platters shows the never-ending food source. As the dinner continues the expression of bizarre food represents the violence. The brain shape oyster half represents human brain which symbolizes like so many humans were sacrificed for that food. The embryo shape meat represents the violence and devil nature of polite society as guest do not hesitate to eat that. Finally the heart fielded with t...
... middle of paper ...
... up to say for what is right.Villeneuve carefully chooses to represent the effect of violence surrounding on the non-violent people. As the violence continues more and more people joins violence than to stand out in the society.
“Next Floor” represents the “polite” society in which despite of the abundance of the natural resources the way society uses the natural resources is less appealing and violent in nature. The violence always prevails in those society though there is abundance of resources and these violence increases with the consumption of natural resources. The film send the message that “polite” society should consume the natural resources with less violent and mrs appealing way or else the whole world fall into the next level of misery to the deep down where nobody could help them.
Works Cited
Next Floor. Dir. Denis Villeneuve. Phi Center.2008.Film.
Anderson may seem like a travel novelist in his writing, but far more is being critiqued in his research. Notably, he is using the ethnographic methodology of research, in which he, through observation, describes a “conceptual picture” (Anderson, 1998, 65). Anderson is analyzing the effect of violence in the social structure of the neighborhoods along Germantown Avenue, and how its effects are visible in the actions of individuals on the street. For one to understand violence it is necessary to understand where violence occurs and, specifically, what in the environment allows violence to occur. Anderson is successfully explaining the transitions of one neighborhood to another, at the same time he is evaluating the normative behavior of the people interacting with the environment of the neighborhood.
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
Violence is often something people complain about to others. When there is an argument it may come to violence. Movies are causing people to become violent because when heroes in movies use violence to beat up the villains, this shows children violence is okay. The article claims that filmmakers should be blamed by putting violence in their movies. Therefore it is up to the parents to watch over their kids. But in a counter argument it claims that violence in music is okay and that the parents should know their kid’s tolerance to violent scenes.
To begin with, violence is introduced multiple times throughout the book and is an example of how personal relationships can be torn down the middle by a single action. First, as Clarice says, "I'm afraid of children my own age. They kill each other. Did it always used to be that way? My uncle says no. Six of my friends have been shot in the last year alone," (Bradbury pg ) is an example of the fact that violence blocks relationships. As said by this child kids are afraid of what there friends are doing and that they would rather be with older more responsible people than there younger immature age. violence has led the kids to abandon there generation in search of something safer. This blocks personal relationships with the kids because kids don't even want to hangout with people there own age now. Second, "Far down the boulevard, four blocks away, the beetle had slowed, spun about on two wheels, and was now racing back, slanting over on the wrong side of the street, picking up speed," (Bradbury pg ) Bradbury is describing a violent scene where Montag is almost hit and killed but the drivers suddenly pull off. The result although good had some flaws that may no be visible from the surface but...
In conclusion, by using the production elements of both allusion and symbolism; director Tim Burton has created the film in such a manner by making deliberate choices in order to invite a certain response. The film is constructed and given greater depth through the allusion to elements from other genres and ridicules the suburbia’s materialism and lack of imagination, which in turn enhances the invited response.
the film shows. The critics said that too much blood and fights would incite a
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
The Outsiders by S.E. Hinton proves the point that violence can be justified if necessary. To inflict change in their lives people often fight with violence instead of peace to evoke change. The world strives for change everyday whether or not you like it. How the people create a change in society whether they use peace or war, it is up to them to decide how to modify our ever changing world. Violence and fight between the Socs and Greasers tells us that both can be justified if it inflicts positive change in society. ‘
As a viewer, the documentary’s intention to inform is more completely fulfilled by research conducted beyond the scope of the camera lens. Had I never written this paper, for instance, the reason for all the violence embedded within the subject matter would remain as enigmatic as the documentary itself.
Kevin Powers and Geoffrey Canada both describe violence and its effects on people in their novels. They assert that violence profoundly changes a person; however, they differ on the merits of these changes. Canada concludes that violence teaches people and helps them grow, while Powers concludes that it dehumanizes and scars them. The two authors also disagree on the necessity of violence. Specifically, Canada argues that violence is necessary and is used to gain distinction and status, while Powers argues that violence is unnecessary and causes people to lose their singularity and identity. Even further, Canada believes violence protects the boys and their lives, while Powers believes violence kills the young soldiers. From their personal experiences, Canada claims boys in the South Bronx need to be violent to gain respect and to survive, while Powers claims the violence of war is a waste of young men’s lives as they lose respect and even their lives.
The emotions throughout the society are shared with the individuals throughout their confusing times, and by their shared experiences. The times spent together of the characters brought the individuals closer together through the dark negative times, and through the light positive situations of society. The confusing part of peoples lives are brought together and are shown throughout the status of society. The stories of the “Encounter,” “Eveline,” and “The Dead” come together with similar experiences of situations of light and dark. The society bring the individuals closer together by shared times.
...gulations on the film industry. However the decision to view violent media is made by the individual. Blaming film production companies for the violence inspired by films is like accusing tobacco companies for lung cancer. The effects of viewing violent media are detrimental, but in order to reduce the problem individuals need to take action.
Since the creation of films, their main goal was to appeal to mass audiences. However, once, the viewer looks past the appearance of films, the viewer realizes that the all-important purpose of films is to serve as a bridge connecting countries, cultures, and languages. This is because if you compare any two films that are from a foreign country or spoken in another language, there is the possibility of a connection between the two because of the fact that they have a universal understanding or interpretation. This is true for the French New Wave films Contempt and Breathless directed by Jean-Luc Godard, and contemporary Indian films Earth and Water directed by Deepa Mehta. All four films portray an individual’s role in society, using sound and editing.
Just how it shows when the power falls into the hands of the group, the terror arise and the violence as well. When they are looking for the stranger it show how the family has no power of the situation and the individuals take control of the situation by showing the family they aren’t playing any games. They show them knifes and the chainsaws through the camera, and they give them a time period. The demand that is exposed in this part shows how the issue is no joke and they are not playing games. When the family runs out of time it gives them the under hand and the power stays with the group of people.
The main character of this book is Sylvia Barret she is a recent college graduate, and works as a high school English teacher. Sylvia would like to work in a nice private school, like so many of her friends. Instead Sylvia takes a job with the board of education, in a nieve attempt to reach out to the under privileged inner-city children in public schools. Sylvia battles with so many choices in this book. In the end she makes the right ones.