Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to divorce
Introduction to divorce
Introduction to divorce
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to divorce
Divorce is the legal dissolution of a marriage by a court or other competent body in a legal proceeding. In Australia the law for divorce is "no fault" which was a major reform to family law introduced by the Family Law Act 1975(Cwlth) in which proof of marital misconduct or "fault” is not required for either parties in a marriage. Prior to this introduction divorce was dealt under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1959 which outlined 14 grounds for divorce including adultery, cruelty, insanity and desertion. This required a married couple who wanted a divorce to apply under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1959 on the ground of ‘fault’ that one or both parties acted in a way that undermined their marriage. This divorce law was considered ineffective and unjust as it required one party to prove fault in the other which was often hard to prove thus parties often saw the other as an enemy causing more turmoil for families. Another factor that proved the divorce law ineffective and unjust is that a couple who wished to obtain a divorce had to wait five years for a divorce to be obtained. People found themselves stuck in an unhappy relationship. How would the parties have managed this time? How would the law achieve justice for the victims of domestic violence?
Hence this Act was replaced by the Family Act 1975(Cwlth) which removed all other grounds for divorce introducing the ground of an “irretrievable breakdown of marriage” shown by both parties and also the Family Court was established which hears all matters related to marriage and divorce. To prove the relationship has irretrievably broken down the parties must live “separately and apart” for 12 months which is set out in the Whiteoak and Whiteoak case (1980) where the couple could not trea...
... middle of paper ...
...ng justice to both parties in a marriage as domestic contribution made by a wife is considered equal to the financial contribution of the other party. This was established in the case the Marriage of Kemp (1976) 2 Fam LR 11, 289. Spousal maintenance provides justice to those who are unable to support themselves due to caring for children and inability to work due to illness.
Overall the law in dealing with divorce is fairly effective as it achieves justice for all individuals in the marriage through the Family Law Act Amendments providing judgements based on the best interests of the child, contribution of each party to the family including non-financial and financial contributions. However through the mandatory counselling the law lessened its effectiveness in achieving justice for parties as this increased trauma for those who were victims of domestic violence.
The controversy, however, lies in the argument from critics that restricting couples from marriage or imposing fines or penalties is unjust. Jennifer Daw, a therapist with the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy quoted an article from USA Today wherein opponents argued that, “divorce regulations or restrictions would create messier divorces, not prevent them and tougher restrictions on divorce could endanger women in abusive marriages.” People were once required to negotiate in divorce. The “No Fault Divorce” has changed that and takes the ground...
Fundamentally the main factors facing a Justice in their decision is the matter of public safety and the harmony of the marriage. Compelling a spouse to testify against their partner is in direct conflict with that ideology. Therefore divorced or legally separated couples do not fall under this category. In R. v. Bailey it was determined that spousal incompetence does not survive divorce. Justice Morden observed that: “The modern policy justification for the rule in question is that is supports marital harmony.
Introduction A century ago, divorce was nearly non-existent due to the cultural and religious pressures placed upon married couples. Though over time Canadians have generally become more tolerant of what was once considered ‘mortal sin’, marital separation and divorce still remain very taboo topics in society. Political leaders are frowned upon when their marriages’ crumble, religions isolate and shun those who break their martial vows, and people continue to look down on those who proceed to legally separate their households. With that being said, couples do not just decide to get a divorce for no particular reason. There must be something driving them towards marital dissatisfaction and further, driving them towards divorce.
Recent amendments to Queensland and Federal Legislation have not solved the problem of domestic violence in Queensland, let alone Australia. Domestic violence involves both physical and emotional behaviour with the patterns of this behaviour centred on power and control for the abuser. Legislation involved in protecting women and men in a domestic violence relationship has been amended to better protect victims. On the other hand, there is an escalating social and legal issues with domestic violence within Australia. Recommendations need to be done to amend Australia legislation, to add protection to victims of domestic violence. Domestic violence is growing rapidly within Queensland and Australia and needs further change to legalisation
" SECTION 1. The property, both real and personal, which any married woman now owns, as her sole and separate property; that which comes to her by descent, devise, bequest, gift or grant; that which she acquires by her trade, business, labor or services, carried on or performed on her sole or separate account; that which a woman married in this State owns at the time of her marriage, and the rents, issues and proceeds of all such property, shall, notwithstanding her marriage, be and remain her sole and separate property, and may be used, collected and invested by her in her own name, and shall not be subject to the interference or control of her husband, or liable for his debts, except such debts as may have been contracted for the support of herself or her children, by her as his agent. The Married Women 's Property Act 1882 (45 & 46 Vict. c.75) was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that significantly altered English law regarding the property rights of married women, which besides other matters allow...
Divorces are easy to obtain in the United States but the decision needs to be carefully examined. According to statistics, “divorce makes sense in the 10 percent to 15 percent of troubled marriages that involve high-level and persistent conflict with severe abuse and physical violence” (Dafoe 1). In the other 85 to 90 percent of marriages, the marriage can and should be reconciled. Many couples simply take the easy way out, find a lawyer, and end the marriage without ever trying to examine whether or not a conclusion can be reached other than divorce.
Good morning Minister of the Families I am Juliet and I will be your consultant for today. I will be outlining the aspects of the law of Domestic and family violence that has a flaw in society. I will be analysing the current laws, evaluating the effectiveness of the law, comparing these laws, making recommendations for changes in the law and justifying how the proposed changes adequately address the needs of the Australian society. Domestic violence is a violent or aggressive behaviour within the home, typically involving the violent of a spouse or partner. Domestic violence in Australia occurs in the privacy of people’s homes and it is mostly upon women that are disadvantaged.
The Family Law Act was first considered for change as the Government felt that the original act did not deal well with family violence, this led to a National Plan being developed to reduce violence against women and their children . This plan came from an enquiry conducted by the Australian Law Reform Commission in 2010 which produced a report that provided information on Family Violence and the legal response; this included a section within this report that informed the reader on 187 recommendations for possible future reforms of the Family Law Act . The report concluded to show the need for an Amendment for the Family Law Act through research that had been conducted around violence within the home showing that men and women exper...
marriage and sets guidelines for property division in the event of the dissolution of the marriage.
Currently the divorce law in England and Wales operates a fault-based system whereby the court grants a divorce if a person can prove that their marriage has broken down. The break down in the marriage can only be due to one of the following five reasons – adultery, unreasonable behaviour, desertion after two years, two years' separation with consent or five years' separation without consent. These requirements were established in the case of Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365.
Prior to the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857, divorce in England was regulated by the Ecclesiastical Courts. Marriage was a permanent state of being for the most part. The Church granted divorces only with the addition of a private act of Parliament, an extensive and costly procedure; therefore, before 1857, only the very wealthy had access to marital termination. The Act of 1857 created the Probate and Divorce Court in London. The law allowed a man to divorce his wife for adultery, but a woman's request for a divorce would only be granted if her husband practiced cruelty, bigamy, incest, and/or bestiality along with adultery. Women could obtain a separation for desertion of more than two years, as well as adultery or cruelty. A deserted wife could also apply for rights of her own property, something not completely legal until 1870. If a woman could not afford the expenses of a divorce procedure, she could only be granted a separation from her husband. Although a good first step, this law still held many limitations for women.
Divorce is a growing epidemic in Canada and the United States. It affects both parties involved, being the spouses, and also has a profound affect on children of the marriage. Recently our government has been revising the old divorce act. It was apparent that it was time to revise the act because it did not properly protect the children from being caught in the middle of things.
(divorce). It says that both a man and a woman have an equal right to
Relationships are all about give and take, and to maintain that balance people must be willing to do the work. Today dissolution of marriage is being used as the easy way out when couples no longer agree. When couples are incapable of maintaining a happy marriage, a divorce can be agreed upon. Divorce is more common nowadays, making the divorce rate a continual increase. About 40 to 50 percent of married couples in the United States divorce (Kazdin). In America, there is one divorce every 13 seconds. That’s 6,646 divorces per day, and 46,523 divorce per week (Irvin). The three main causes of divorce is the lack of communication, financial difficulties, and infidelity.
When life becomes unbearable between a women an her husband, they may think of divorce as being a fair solution for both of them to get their “independence” and live a normal life, they may even think that it is suitable for their children. However, this is not the case , divorce may have some serious consequences that can affect the whole society .