Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The argument of the existence of god
The existences of god
Science vs Religion- some of the debates
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The argument of the existence of god
Does god exist? One of the most controversy topics in today’s world that has grown over the years. Whether he exist or not has been an argument between theist and atheist all over. Even though people should believe that god exist because the bible has concealed that his presence on this earth was real, god doesn’t exist because there is no scientific that his presence was real. It all lies on what people let their minds to believe.
It is pointless to take something based upon faith, which is based on no proof, just ambitious thoughts. This may be something that everyone may not agree upon, but I believe it is true. For as long as people first started their beliefs in god it has seemed that is a thought humans have just created in their own heads. Never in the history of humanity have we had any real proof that god was ever really real. The only ‘evidence’ we’ve had is documentaries and TV shows saying he must have existed. But still not even media has real proof. We all move on with our lives but we can definitely say that the question of does god actually exist is one to pop up into our minds more than we may even actually know it.
It all depends on what you are truly trying to find in a religion. If all you’re looking for is guidance and assistance, in living a fulfilling life, then a way of living without any beliefs in any paranormal being may be all that you may need. Many other religions such as mainline versions of Islam and Christianity, promise more than the others. They promise saving you from sin or evil in your life. If we are true to their teachings we’ll be safe from total destruction when we die and will be happy forever in our life after we descend from this earth. Because of the importance of this issue to all t...
... middle of paper ...
...s really upon us who protect ourselves and stay away from any harm or danger from life that has to throw in all our paths throughout life as we live it. Until we have someone who can give real evidence, this all made up information that we have let ourselves to create and build into our heads without thinking and stopping what we truly are letting our minds to think.
In conclusion, as much as humanity has been trying to get every piece of evidence there is to get other people to believe in god, he does not exist because we yet still have to wait for a confirmed answer of yes or no whether he was in fact once on this planet earth. Until then any other information is false and has no backup to it. Its all information that has been scattered around taken in by human beings for may years making them have that thought in their heads that god is real and he does exist.
In conclusion I am left pretty much in the same place as I have started. It is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of God philosophically. For every philosopher who publishes his or her opinions on the subject, three more are there to tear it down. In the end I think it is best that man does not figure out the answer to this lifelong question. Some things are better left unanswered.
The existence of God is quite controversial issue. God has different names in the world, and a lot of people, strongly believe in his existence. While, on the other hand, there are also people who don’t believe in his existence. In their discussion entitled “Does God Exist?” William Lane Craig, who is the supporter of the idea of existence of God, debates with Austin Dacey, who is an atheist, on the idea of existence of God. They provide the strong arguments and their debates are quite interesting, and innovative (not similar to those arguments, we usually read about in book). These are the fresh views on the question of existence and non-existence of God.
Whether god exists or not has been in discussion for thousands of years, and an important discussion. Whether it is rational to believe in god or not is another story, like believing in god itself, this topic has brought many discussions. It is one thing to discuss whether god is real or not and it is a complete other to discuss whether it is rational to believe in god or not. I believe that while there may not be any convincing evidence or arguments that God does exist, I do still believe that it is still rational to believe that god does exist. I think this because, believing in God is not simply just believing that he exists, but believing that it can bring good to our lives, we otherwise would not have. It teaches us to have a moral responsibility not only to others, but ourselves. It is obvious that many people do believe in god, but many of us choose to do so for reasons other than just believing in God. I do believe that just because there is no evidence, that does not mean God doesn’t exist. Like I said, God brings more to our lives than just a belief, but an ability to achieve a better one. And even if God is just an imaginary figure, he is an imaginary figure that brings hope and goodness to our lives, which we can never discount.
There is evil. 3. So, God does not exist”. Since there is evil, then that means God does not exist.
forgiven, so there is no need to ‘force’ yourself to believe. This argument is far from proving the existence of God, it argues more for. the purpose of believing in him rather than whether he actually exists. The.. In conclusion, all the arguments bar one that have been covered have. been strongly criticised, questioning their validity.
There are many theories to why a God might exist, but the Ontological argument tells us that a God is a necessary truth based on the self-contradictory or denying the existence of God. They use the proposition of the concept of God to argue the implied existence of God. This is to suppose that God is by definition the greatest thing imaginable and that to imagine something greater which can also exist is impossible. They use the general rule of positive and negative existential claims to try and prove the existence of God. they do this in a number of ways, with the classic version of the ontological argument being the most recognized, the reductio ad absurdum ("reduction of absurdity") of the ontological argument and the modal versions of the argument. It explains that nothing can exist in the imagination alone, it must also exist in reality to truly exist, and they have decided that there has to be such a being that exists in the imagination and in reality that noting greater can exist. I do not find this argument to be true in stating the fact that God must exist in reality, al...
hat for a belief to be true knowledge, it must be supported by evidence. Evidentialism also claims
Religion has existed since the dawn of civilization and over time has evolved into the religions we have today. Today the most prominent religions are monotheistic, having one omnipotent god, and despite having many differences they share basic tenets of respect and kindness. Religions, such as Judaism, give explanations for the unknown, provide hope, and bring about a sense of community.
...ne that is non-existent, it is based on confusion. As Kant puts it, existence is not predicate, an asset or a substance that can be said to possess or lack certain traits. When individuals point out that God is existent, they are not in the real sense saying that there is an existent God and that he contains the traits of existence (Purtill 297).
Bertrand Russell, a renowned analytic philosopher, argues about the existence of God in his article “Is there a God?” (1952). For most of his life Russell held the opinion that religions are meant to instill distress and helplessness into people’s minds and belief in religion is the major cause for all the deadly conflicts that have occurred in the past. In his article “Is there a God?” Russell discusses how theologians have been presenting their arguments to prove God’s existence and then gives his own reflection on their thoughts. Questioning God’s existence and giving arguments that refute such beliefs could turn into a controversial discussion and many theists, who have blind faith in God’s existence, find such arguments offensive to their beliefs. Taking the sensitive nature of this subject into account, Russell’s article does not display any offensive characteristics and the way he dealt with this issue by taking a neutral stance should be appreciated. Most of his arguments are remarkably convincing, even for theists, and make the reader think about God’s existence rationally. His way of dealing with the issue through rational means is what makes this article suitable for both theists and atheists. However, at some instances, Russell’s bias towards atheism can be observed by pointing out fallacies in his arguments.
... God and how He is related to us – how powerful He is to make everything in this world works; how He made everything almost perfect for us. I have also learned that believing He exist, makes me understand more about His existence, just like what St. Anselm said. I believe that believing He exists, is what makes Him exist. For me, Yes, God really exist.
...ren Kierkegaard talks about how to do it. He differentiates between subjective truth and objective truth and explains which one is better for faith. Faith and objective truth don’t coincide, so you must choose one or the other. Blaise Pascal talks about the possible benefits and consequences of taking the “leap of faith” and the possible benefits and consequences of not taking it. And Descartes helps to reinforce the faith of believers by providing a subjective argument that God does exist. In the end, the “leap of faith” is a risk worth taking.
But I don't want to presuppose that God's existence is a fact before the proof is established. Simply by looking at what constitutes our world, we can say that all matter consists of energy, proving the existence of energy. How, then, do we know this energy exists? The simple answer is, we are aware of it. We then only have to find out how this awareness came about.
Today, faith is the cornerstone of all major religious knowledge claims because there is no definitive way of...
Religion can be defined as a system of beliefs and worships which includes a code of ethics and a philosophy of life. Well over 90% of the world 's population adheres to some form of religion. The problem is that there are so many different religions. What is the right religion? What is true religion? The two most common ingredients in religions are rules and rituals. Some religions are essentially nothing more than a list of rules, dos and don 'ts, which a person must observe in order to be considered a faithful adherent of that religion, and thereby, right with the God of that religion. Two examples of rules-based religions are Islam and Judaism. Islam has its five pillars that must be observed.