The Foundations Of Economics Website: Comparative Critical Review (CCR)

1343 Words3 Pages

In the recent decades, the issue of employment has become considerably serious due to progressive importance of the economic world. The Foundations of Economics textbook written by Andrew Gillespie (2011) and an online text website (www.vtstutorials.co.uk) designed by John Kane (2014) have been chosen for this comparative critical review (CCR). The Labour Market chapter chosen from the textbook aim to develop readers' understandings of the labour market, similarly, the website focus on formulating the relationship between labour business and economic. The purpose of this CCR is to provide a thorough comparison of these sources and evaluate the more convincing and accessible one for students and educators to apply. This CCR is going to argue …show more content…

On the contrary, brand-new information can arouse people’s interest to study because these new messages are more related to readers’ lives. In term of the editing time, the online program probably has a slight advantage because this website was designed in 2014 while the book was published in 2011. Secondly, the subtitles of the website (Kane, 2014) contain many current issues such as gender wage differences, racial differences in earning and Ethnic differences in earnings, these information were excluded in the textbook. Nevertheless, the textbook (Gillespie, 2011) has introduced numerous events happened in last years while the online notes are short of providing real cases. For instance, this textbook (Gillespie, 2011) uses the world’s 10 most popular bands in 2012 and the wages of five top Premier League Clubs during 2008 to 2009 as two applicable examples to help scholars and students understand a subtitle named Changes in demand and supply of labour. However, the textbook indicated a case study in Earning in the UK in 2005 might be slightly outdated. In addition, after comparison, the graph and statistics in both sources are similar, and this might prove that the data are output in close time and …show more content…

After comparing in details, it can be observed that the chapter (Gillespie, 2011) is more well-organised than the website (Kane, 2014). First of all, the places of definitions in the textbook are much better than webpage. Because the textbook’s key terms are normally presented before or after relevant examples while the website (Kane, 2014) is simply separate the definitions from other supports. This organisation of definitions can highly enhance the understanding of knowledge points and improves the efficiencies of readers. Furthermore, the chapter is divided into eleven subtitles, and each of them have their own points as well. Similarly, the website is separated by eleven units which the first unit is an overall view of the whole chapter. In the textbook (Gillespie, 2011), there are several questions for putting into practice after each small topic while the website has no questions in the end. These questions can push students to consider deeply after learning every small topic. In addition, the textbook provides various checklists, review questions and key learning points at the end of the whole chapter, this arrangement is useful for scholars and students to review learned contents. On a contrast, there is no any review questions or checklist occur at the end of the website, this weakness might lead to the need of

More about The Foundations Of Economics Website: Comparative Critical Review (CCR)

Open Document