Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of mass media on public opinion
Mass media bias
Media influence on public opinion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of mass media on public opinion
Introduction This paper will cover the omnipresence of media biases and their implications in three news stories from various newspapers including The Washington Post, The Los Angeles Times and The New York Times through content-analysis and comparison. Matthew Gentzkow and Jesse M. Shapiro in “Media Bias and Reputation”from the Journal of Political Economy argue that media biases, distort information to make it conform with consumers’ prior [political] beliefs in order to shape reports in whatever way will be most likely to improve the reputations of media outlets [thus increasing future profits by expanding the demand for their products] (Gentzkow & Shapiro, 2006, pg. 282). Additionally, in Four Information Biases That Matter W. Lance Bennett suggests that biases in the the news overwhelmingly plays to the human-interest angle and fragments the stories. The prevalence toward personalization and fragmentation biases engages readers through conformation to prior beliefs, such as using bias to affect readers’ political leanings and ultimately increases demand for their publication through likability and inquisition caused by unclear, fragmented stories. Analysis The first article by Ed O’Keffe (“After government shutdown, dozens of lawmakers gave to charity” taken from the February 26, 2014 issue of The Washington Post) exhibits a noticeable clouding of the “big picture” due to personalization and fragmentation biases. These biases implicate an increase in demand for newspapers. The article examines an investigation into the claim that 116 U.S. lawmakers, following the government shutdown, pledged to donate part of their federal salaries to appease voters. Personalization bias refers to the tendency to downplay the big social... ... middle of paper ... ...ith a decrease of objective journalism and an increase in the demand for news products. Moreover, the prevalence of personalization and fragmentation biases affects readers’ political leanings and ultimately increases demand for their publication through likability and inquisition caused by unclear, fragmented stories. Given my findings, the news media, in order to improve its quality of news reporting should not only work to reduce or remove biases, such as personalization and fragmentation, from their articles but to strive for objectivity as well. These goals can be accomplished through a more focused and succinct writing and interviewing process; a process used to avoid a cloudy, unfocused, or misleading news article. Though entirely objective journalism is quite unattainable, taking steps to remove biases may aid in improving the quality of news reporting.
Media concentration allows news reporters to fall victim to source bias, commercial impulse, and pack journalism. Together, all three of the aforementioned factors become known as horse race journalism, a cause for great concern in campaign media. In complying with horse race journalism, media outlets exclude third party candidates, reinforce the idea that politics is merely a game, and dismiss issues that directly affect voters and their day to day lives. Through horse race journalism, the media is mobilized in impeding an active form of the democratic debate in American politics. Even across the wide range of human values and beliefs, it is easy to see that campaign media coverage must be changed, if not for us, then for our children. It is imperative that we discern the flaws of the media and follow our civic duty to demand better media
The two key terms “agenda setting” and “gotcha” journalism are going to be used within this paper to show you how politicians and news organizations try to persuade the public. The “agenda setting” is a term that “involves using the news to influence what the public regards as important for them to think about in society and politics.” (Bennett, Lance pg. 23) This is a major tool for news organizations or politicians to seek a public relation toward a certain aspect that they’re addressing their agenda and framing it to formulate their partisan viewpoints. Now for “gotcha” jour...
In “Reporting the News” by George C. Edwards III, Martin P. Wattenberg, and Robert L. Lineberry, the main idea is how the media determines what to air, where to get said stories that will air, how the media presents the news, and the medias effect on the general public. “Reporting The News” is a very strong and detailed article. The authors’ purpose is to inform the readers of what goes on in the news media. This can be inferred by the authors’ tone. The authors’ overall tone is critical of the topics that are covered. The tone can be determined by the authors’ strong use of transitions, specific examples, and phrases or words that indicate analysis. To summarize, first, the authors’ indicate that the media chooses its stories that will air
“The old argument that the networks and other ‘media elites’ have a liberal bias is so blatantly true that it’s hardly worth discussing anymore…No we don’t sit around in dark corners and plan strategies on how we’re going to slant the news. We don’t have to. It comes naturally to most reporters.” (Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News) This example is tremendously important in the author’s discussion because it proves that news stories do manipulate people through bias. Popular news networks are viewed by thousands of people every single day, thus making it have a huge impact on the public since they believe what they see. When news reporters present their news segments, it is natural for them to give their insights due to human nature being instinctively biased. “The news media is [sic] only objective if they report something you agree with… Then they’re objective. Otherwise they’re biased if you don’t agree, you know.” (CNN’s American Morning) In this quote, the readers are presented to current panelists agreeing that news consumers have a very hard time separating their own view of the news from the perspective of the news reporters because they are presenting their own opinions throughout their segments. This problem exists once again because of the bias that is contained in media
In reporting national issues, objectivity should be priority number one for the media. Instead, the stories ...
During these difficult economic times sensationalism has become more prevalent in the media. Stories involving sex scandals and child murders have taken over our T.V and internet screens as well as the front pages of our newspapers. The media bias of sensationalism has been used as a sort of escapism for readers. Although it may seem that sensationalism has just started making waves, it has been around for decades. Sensationalism has been influencing viewers and contributing to media bias since the days of the penny press. Sensationalisms long history has been turbulent, self-serving, and influential to today’s reporting practices. With the influence over readers’ sensationalism’s media bias have and will continue to affect media reporting for years to come.
Although, in recent years it is seen that consumers are less likely to subscribe to newspapers and/or watch the daily news. This is due to the fact that they are typically bias in their opinions, and are seen to lack the whole story when presented. Rise in polarization in the media is due to a new found competition between news networks, which was not present sixty years ago. Wilson says, “the news we get is not only more omnipresent, it is also more competitive and hence often more adversarial”. The media outlets are fighting for views, and are willing to do whatever it takes to get them. Which leads to them configuring the stories to what people want to here. Thus making their viewer ratings higher. It is known that certain news stations get more views depending on the political party. “Those who watch CNN are more likely to be Democrats than Republicans; the reverse is emphatically true of Fox”. The media has more outlets to reach their viewers to maximize the effectiveness of their biased
But how can we be sure that the news is not biased? Are we receiving information accurately, with details being simple to understand? After further research on media framing, I’ve come to realize that it is not rare to be someone who is skeptical of the news. In decades before now, media did a better job serving the public interests inside their news stories (Callaghan, 2001, p.186). But now, journalists may mix up facts intentionally and build a different story (Callaghan, 2001, p.184). How can one feel safe after knowing the media changes stories to keep us interested? Boring stories may not keep someone excited or fully interested, but at least people would not be misinformed and can, in a way, better prepare for what they will face outside their
Over seventy percent of Americans believe news is purposely biased(SPJ Code of Ethics). This shows that the people in America know their news is biased and are okay with it. Media bias is hurting the way people view races, religious groups, and certain jobs. Before investigating the situation wholly, people tend to believe what the media is saying which could be a stretch of the truth or even a lie. This essay is about Media Bias and all of the important information surrounding this controversial topic: journalism ethics, the “myth” of liberal media bias, and police department controversy.
Bias in the media People all around the country watch the news everyday, the same stories the same places day after day. People are oblivious to how media bias is used in every kind of media everywhere; in the newspaper, magazines , and television. Media bias has existed since early media and will exist until it is known about and stopped. People are victims of media bias on an everyday basis without knowing so.
News sources in particular can use selective coverage of current or historical events to theoretically slant individuals’ perceptions of them. This type of partisan media also authorizes distinguished members of the favored group to gain increased coverage that helps to spread party preferences to the masses (Davis 277). Additionally, this coverage often includes clear directions to audiences about how to get involved in local politics (Kim 660-661). However, the effects of these directives and partisan cues are limited to individuals with like-minded political beliefs, as people “tend to accept positive perceptions of the favored candidate and negative perceptions of the opposed candidate when they are exposed to congenial media coverage” (Kim
The recent boom in technology is a factor in that. People are not solely tied to one news outlet. They are able to read the article on CNN, watch it on television, and see real-time footage of it on television. Though this research was thorough, the investigation was limited by a small pool of academics due to the search tools made available. It is understood that older scholars may have a stronger argument as to why objectivity is important during times of war, but there journals could not be uncovered. As journalism students complete their studying at their schools they will question the fairness with objectivity, and if it should be such a staple in the
Commercial media represents archetypal platforms of a two-sided market; on one side, they offer information to their viewers, and on the other, they offer entertainment and adverts to their customers. In this paper I will argue that good journalism is undermined by commercial media due to the role of advertising and circulation as a source of revenue for media outlets. Both commercial media bias and the use of sensationalism demonstrates, unequivocally, that the commercial economics of the media conflict explicitly with its partisan politics. A model of advertising-free journalism will be explored to determine the viability of media that is free of commercial pressure. Additionally, defenders of commercial media will be examined in establishing the implicit influences of commercialism that cause unethical behaviour. Commercial incentive creates a conflict between good journalism and commercial media that is too great to be ignored or looked over, and thus the goal of informing viewers is often compromised.
I recently read an article somewhere, in which BBC journalist Sigrun Rottman said that objectivity in journalism is an illusion and the media should think more of being balanced than being objective. According to her, objectivity in the media does not really exist. This hit home for me because before being a journalism student I believed that objectivity in journalism was undoubtedly the focal point of the profession and that the business of every journalist was to be objective. The truth and the reality of this belief as we know it and as I have come to understand is that objectivity in journalism really doesn’t exist or to put it in better terms, it doesn’t exist to the extent that we perceive it should. So, the oft-stated and exceedingly desired goal of modern journalism is objectivity - the ‘disconnected’ gathering and dissemination of news and information; this allows people to arrive at decisions about the world and events occurring in it without the journalist’s subjective views influencing the acceptance and/or rejection of the information. It’s a pity that such a goal is impossible to achieve! As long as humans gather and disseminate news and information, objectivity is an unrealizable dream.
Independence and impartiality in journalism have always been a significant principle in measuring the quality of journalistic materials. Impartiality requires neutral and unbiased coverage of the events. It means that the journalist must report only the facts and not a personal beliefs and emotions toward the facts. According to this standard, being objective means to present different sides of an argument and maintain a balance of viewpoints, avoiding manipulation of the audience. Author and former broadcast executive David Cox defines impartiality most clearly: “Impartiality involves no more than the attempt to regard different ideas, opinions, interests, or individuals with detachment” (Sambrook, 2012). However, the question of pure impartiality