Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Utilitarian medical ethics
Ethical dilemmas within health care
Essays on health care ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Utilitarian medical ethics
Utilitarianism means choices to public benefit, utilitarianism guides to make choice that makes greatest benefit for most of people (Principles and Theories). Aims of utilitarianism can be criticized when person wants to make choices for own benefits. (Sajama 1993.) When arranging health care services I think that when thinking utilitarianism everyone can try to achieve own benefit but at same time think and respect public equity. In my opinion utilitarianism is connected to responsibility and obligation. Policy-makers have responsibility of decisions for public benefit. Decision –makers have responsibility to get knowledge and hear specialists to underpin decisions. And In other hand people have responsibility to vote decision -makers and do other decisions as get medical care, pay taxes etc. It´s difficult to make choices that are best for most of people concerning all groups affected at issue. All the groups have to be defended and speak of the problems that are according them particularly those parties who cant speak of them own. 2.2 Paternalism Paternalism means that people´s rights are interfered because of action´s targets to cause good, benefits, welfare and according to people´s values. Some law or action of health care professional may be paternalism. (Launis 2010.) Some people think that it´s paternalism when society define our needs for example what health care services are arranged in spite of what we need or want. As utilitarianism, paternalism is also connected to decision makers´ responsibility. It may feel that decisions are defined by the state but decision-makers are responsible for decisions according to fundamental law. These days when municipal services suffer from the recession new arrangements of munic... ... middle of paper ... ...have equal health care services. This challenge is with refugees in small cities for example when arranging interpreter service to minority languages in small cities. How it´s possible to arrange equal health and welfare services in client oriented way? In my opinion health equality is linked up to several ethical principals. To achieve health equality human dignity, human rights, equality, the common good approach and fairness and justice approach are observed. When pondering ethical principals in arranging health care services, many principals are connected with each other. Utilitarianism is connected to equality and human dignity and these principals are connected to responsibility and duty. Responsibility and duty is also connected to paternalism. Also to one topic is linked to many ethical issues that make these issues many-sided and challenging to discuss.
The four ethical virtues of health care must be shown, compassion, discernment, integrity and trustworthiness. Respecting a person’s autonomy understanding and acting on the belief the people have the right decision to make decisions and take action based on their beliefs and value systems. The ethical issues that would be encountered will be to treat each person with passion and respect regardless of sex, race, and religious preference. The environment has no human rights violations, sustains nursing ethical
Wilson , James G. S., “Rights”, Principles of Health Care Ethics, Second Edition, eds. R.E. Ashcroft, A. Dawson, H. Draper and J.R. McMillan. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2007. pp. 239.
Utilitarianism aims at a goal of greatest happiness and justifies any act that achieves that goal. It is a consequentialism, which means it solely, completely based on the outcome. This ethical concept believes that the greatest good for the greatest number. So the right thing to do is when we bring the best and most happiness for the majority, and is necessary to prevent the greatest amount of unhappiness.
According to Sober, "Utilitarianism is an ethical theory whose central idea is 'the greatest good for the greatest number'" (Sober 430). Utilitarianism rose in opposition to the idea that the upper crust of society had the right to arrange the rules of society as they saw fit. The concern of Utilitarianism is the most good for the most people, not the most good for the people that "matter." From this standpoint, Utilitarianism appears to be an attractive ethical theory. However, there are many philosophers who criticize Utilitarianism. They argue that the apparently simple premise of Utilitarianism has many complex problems behind it. For example, what is happiness? How can we ensure the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people? And what happens if acting for the greatest good for the greatest number leads to injustice? I believe that a specific variation of Utilitarianism -- Rule Utilitarianism -- can adequately address these problems, and it is therefore the most plausible ethical theory.
“Utilitarianism is the creed which accepts as the foundations of morals utility of the greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” (Mil, 90). Utilitarianism ethics is based on the greatest good for the greatest number meaning that the moral agent does what he/she thinks will be
Utilitarian views involve ethics and doing what is right, which will produce the most good. As Dr. Driver
The main principle of utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle. It states that, "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure" (Mill, 1863, Ch. 2, p330). In other words, it results with the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people that are involved.
..., beneficence, non-maleficence and justice help us understand and explain which medical practices are ethical and adequate. These principles are used to protect the rights of a patient and the physician from being dishonored. The principle autonomy allow an individual to act freely in accordance to their self-chosen plan. This means that healthcare providers must always get the patients consent before making any decision about patient’s life. The of non-maleficence states one must cause no harm to an individual. This means that we must always restrain from harming others. The principle of beneficences say that one must always promote good. This means that healthcare providers must always do what is good for the patient. Lastly the principle of justice promote fairness and equally. This mean that healthcare providers cannot act in a prejudice manner toward patients.
Utilitarianism can be defined as: the right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians seem to believe that humans only have two desires, or motivations: happiness and pain. They want as much happiness as possible and the least amount of pain as any other action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning that whether it is right, depends solely on its consequences.
Garrett, T. M., Baillie, H. W., & Garrett, R. M. (2010). Health care ethics: Principles and problems (5thed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best
Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain.
We have our own moral codes but our decisions are solely based on the impact of our perspective on the people’s welfare and happiness. Although it is in our perspective as utilitarian to decide what actions to make, the theory of utilitarianism has strengths and weaknesses.
The five principles of HP include building healthy public policy, creating supportive environments, strengthening community action, developing personal skills, and reorienting health services (McMurray & Clendon 2015). The first principle aims to incorporate health into all public policy decisions beyond the health system so that living and working conditions become conducive to health and equity (Germov, Freij & Richmond 2015). According to McMurray & Clendon (2015), multi-sectoral collaboration is required among different sectors, such as education, industry and social welfare, with the reciprocally influential policies that guide the community health. The second principle emphasises the socio-ecological approach to health that promotes sustainable environment and broader social support systems that encourage a safe and satisfying life (Germov, Freij & Richmond 2015; McMurray & Clendon 2015). This principle requires to acknowledge the significance of conserving the physical or social resources that allow people to maintain health (McMurray & Clendon 2015). The third principle focuses on information and learning opportunities that enable communities to make knowledgeable choices for better health (McMurray & Clendon
Utilitarianism is defined to be “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (Vaughn 64). In other words, for a utilitarian,