Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should zoos be banned
Cruelty of animals an essay
Animal cruelty in zoos and circuses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should zoos be banned
Although many families have argued that zoos are educational buildings that aloud children and adults to gain knowledge about wild life and are not harmful for animals, closer examinations show that zoos are just entertainment centers that should be shut down. However, debate about whether the zoo should be shut down or not has become more serious. Zoos should be shut down. Animals suffer from mistreatment, malnutrition and murder, also people don’t gain the right knowledge about these animals because zoos aren’t educational and the horrific stories about the animals are all the reasons why zoos should be shut down.
Strolling down a dusty dirt trail, hearing the sound of children’s laughter in a earshot and the king of the jungles mighty roar bellowing for attention. Seeing the sign labeled “Lions Beware” you enter a shadowy cave, the air smelling of must, you come upon a window that allows you to come face to face with the beast. Witnessing its motionless face laying on the rigid ground, you lose interest and continue your journey. Many people feel that zoos do everything correctly to maintain the animal’s health and well being, as well as debating that zoos even have a breeding program to keep up with all the species of animals. However, many people aren’t aware of the cruelty behind zoos and how animals are mistreated, murdered and suffer from malnutrition. Lions are cramped into small cages and sea lions swim in water that contains chemicals, causing them to lose eye sight, is just a few examples. The breeding program that many debate about gives the public a false sense that something meaningful has happened but in reality animals might show no interest in mating and zoo babies are just crowd-pleas...
... middle of paper ...
...o it themselves. Peta is a corporation that helps and fights for all animals needs. This corporation strongly advises to avoid patronizing these attractions and instead donate to campaigns that actually protect animals in their native habitats, because zoos are hideous institutions that do not deserve public support.
In conclusion zoos are entertainment centers that should be shut down because of the animals being mistreated, murdered or suffer from malnutrition, also zoos aren’t educational, and the stories about animals behind the bars in zoos. In order to keep the circle of life and continue to have animals be a part of the world, humans must take basic steps to maintain the balance and allow animals to live in their natural environments without any negative influences by humans. By taking these actions most zoos around the world should be shut down.
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Animal rights have become a very serious issue here in the United States over the last few decades. One issue that has been discussed is whether or not zoos serve a good purpose or are they just a torture chamber for the animals. Locked up in small cages so people can yell at them and stare. Or are zoos the key to save our species in an ever growing human population. Rachel Lu, a philosophy teacher and senior columnist, writes the article, “Let’s Keep Zoos: Learning stewardship is a good thing.”, published April 18, 2014, argues that zoos are worth keeping. Rachel Lu uses her personal experiences to appeal to her audience that zoos are valuable to people especially young children because it gives them a perspective on nature.
Due to the recent events in the Cincinnati Zoo, arguments have been sparked about the ethics of zoos. Most articles try to argue against zoos and closed environments, but there are those that still support zoos and the programs that they provide for endangered species. The argument “Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals” focuses on the positives of animal enclosures and fights for support to keep zoos in business. The author, Dr. Robin Ganzert, ties examples about programs that zoos help create and what type of research is conducted in the zoos, to support his claims. To limit his position, he decides to refute opposing viewpoints to conclude that ethical institutions
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
The difference between right and wrong is not always perfectly clear. A long-standing part of cultures across the world, zoological and animal parks have been around for hundreds of years. While in the past concerns and issues regarding the ethical problems zoos seem to impose were less prominent, in recent times the rise of animal rights activist groups and new generational values have influenced the way people view these parks. Critics believe that zoos are an unnatural habitat for animals and force them to live in captivity, having a negative impact on their health. Yet, there are still many who fully support zoos, citing business and educational reasons.
Zoos have been very controversial lately with debate about animal cruelty and speculations shifting around the industry, so what is the truth about zoos? Zoos are known to be a safe area for animals and humans, entertain individuals and be a safe containment for endangered animals. Knowing this information it’s factual to say that this sounds like the perfect place for animals and humans, and they are.
There are many places where people can go to see live animals such as aquariums, zoos, and safari parks. A pleasant way to define a Zoo is to call it “an establishment that maintains a collection of wild animals”. (Google def) Another way to say that is a facility in which animals are “enclosed in cages for public exhibition”. I believe zoos are ethical; however, changes need to be made to eliminate problems I have discovered. In this argumentative essay, I will be arguing the ethics of zoos and certain problems that need to be addressed that people are not aware of. Zoos are great places to take the family out for the day to have entertainment; however, problems such as captive breeding, length of life, and animal stress need to improve.
In the film, Madagascar, zoos are depicted as a sanctuary in which all the exotic animals are kept safe and are open for the public to view. But many would argue that zoos are inhumane, the charging of animals for our personal entertainment is unjustifiable. Those who believe that zoos are wrong and should be destroyed are animal rights activists; they believe that animals should be allowed to choose their own destiny. Those that believe that zoos are an important part of our lives are scientists and zoologists. This debate has gone on for generations and average folk are stuck in the middle, not knowing which side to stand on.
I have always loved animals and enjoyed going to zoos the see exotic animals that I don't see in every day life. Today people think that zoos are harmful to the animals. Zoos are more helpful than harmful to the animals in them. We can save zoos and the animals in them by remembering that zoos take care of animals and protect them.
The human interests that are considered when zoos are brought up include recreational and educational entertainment, occupational opportunities, and economic benefit derived from tourism and the visitation of zoos. The interests in the non-human animal’s corner include the right to freedom, the ability to be with family, have opportunities that are not present in captivity such as territorial exploration and natural mating. The interests can be equally considered and still not have a definitive answer because factors outside of Singer’s argument come into play. His consideration approach does still have merit when it comes to the argument for or against zoos regardless of the lack of a definite side in his
What do you think about zoos? Children standing in front of big cages, feel excited to see those lovely animals and share the joy with their parents. Parents will then read aloud the information on the signs to educate the children. At lunch hour, animals in bonds wait for delicious dishes provided by zoo keepers and live happily ever after. It seems that zoos are really a heaven to us and animals. It gives us a place to keep close to nature, saving those little pitiful things in wild. Unluckily, that is not the truth we wished. Indeed, zoos magnify their contribution to educational circle, exaggerating the importance of role play in conservation work, in order to cover those disgraceful secrets behind.
Zoos provide an invaluable service and therefore should not be closed. Animals are able to reproduce easier. They are able to eat more. Kids of all ages enjoy seeing and learning about endangered species.
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers.
Many enjoy watching cute and beautiful critters with their children, but would a day at the zoo be as pleasant if we were aware of the abuse, depression, and neglect? With the death of nearly 500 of one zoos captives, penguins dying in a dirty tank without their necessary water, and a two year old giraffe killed and dissected in front of children to feed to the lions, when will we ask ourselves; what will it take to close zoos? Firstly, animals are neglected. They are often forced into unhealthy habits, malnourished, not properly groomed, starved, and just not well taken care of.