Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on protecting endangered species
Keeping animals in zoos ethical considerations stake holders
Efforts taken to protect endangered wildlife
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on protecting endangered species
Science has shown that some mammals are far more intelligent than society initially thought; there is evidence that primates are making their way into their own stone age (Westergaard), and certain countries in Asia have started granting rights to species that are self-aware. Society, however, still keeps many of these mammals in zoos. Some believe zoos will never be able to give the proper care to the animals while others say zoos should not exist at all. Zoos have become progressively more humane over the years by moving away from the age of small, tile boxes, but no one is sure how much change is enough. Organizations like the AZA, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, have helped progress by setting standards for treatment, but many of …show more content…
Zoos want people to think they are seeing animals in their natural habitats, but they also need the visitors to be able to easily see the animals up close. Lars Lunding Andersen, a curator at the Copenhagen Zoo and president of the International Association of Zoo Educators, describes zoo exhibits like this: zoo visits are like watching a play where the animals are the actors and their enclosure is their set (Andersen). When the emphasis is put on the experience of the visitor, it becomes extremely difficult to properly care for the animal. On the same note, if the emphasis was put on the animal's health, the larger enclosures would make it hard to see the animals, meaning less visitors and scarce funding. Looking from an environmental perspective, society must therefore consider a zoo’s effect on an animal and the benefits of conservation efforts, while still keeping in mind the needs of the …show more content…
The standard for elephant enclosures set by the AZA is 1800 square feet for one elephant. This is less than one acre, and Leslie Schobert, a retired general curator at the Los Angeles Zoo, states they need at least 100 acres to live a healthy life (“Do Elephants Belong”). Most zoos, however, are less than 100 acres total, making it impossible to meet these needs (“Captive Breeding”). Keep in mind this is just one animal, so zoos would require significantly more space to ensure every animal in its collection has a healthy environment. Zoos could start fixing this problem by having fewer animals. The animals that require the most space could be excluded from the park, creating more room to expand the other enclosures. This solution might solve the issue of space, but animals still may not be as healthy as in the wild. Elephants in the wild will walk up to 50 miles a day in search for food, water, and other necessities, but when everything they need is conveniently provided by the zoo, elephants simply do not walk as much as they should. There are zoos like the Reid Park Zoo that hide treats around the enclosure and have daily walks for exercise, but it is still extremely difficult to replicate an animal’s natural environment (“Do Elephants”). Since the same reasoning can be applied to every animal, zoos have a serious problem on their hands. Additionally,
Animal rights have become a very serious issue here in the United States over the last few decades. One issue that has been discussed is whether or not zoos serve a good purpose or are they just a torture chamber for the animals. Locked up in small cages so people can yell at them and stare. Or are zoos the key to save our species in an ever growing human population. Rachel Lu, a philosophy teacher and senior columnist, writes the article, “Let’s Keep Zoos: Learning stewardship is a good thing.”, published April 18, 2014, argues that zoos are worth keeping. Rachel Lu uses her personal experiences to appeal to her audience that zoos are valuable to people especially young children because it gives them a perspective on nature.
...es to places to display animals for curiosity and education, to parks where animals can be seen in their more natural habitats. The perception around enclosures and cages in general is often criticised, with Bartay and Hardouin believing that “every aspect of humanity’s relationship with nature can be perceived through the bars of the zoological garden: repulsion and fascination; the impulse to appropriate, master and understand… linked to vast parallel histories of colonization, ethnocentrism and the discovery of the other… to tour the cages of the zoo is to understand the society that erected them.” (Bishop, 2004: 107). This suggests regardless of an enclosure’s size, nature or specification it is a direct indication of humanity’s desire to control and exhibit animal others. Malamud agrees with this view, arguing that all practises of animal containment “convince
Even though zoos try to imitate the natural habitat of each animal, the area for the zoo might not be able to support the animals needed environment. When visiting a zoo many people fail to notice that the animals have living areas measuring an acre or smaller. “Their enclosures are often small, barren, and without shade or privacy” (Laws). “Animals also need to endure dirty living conditions, stagnant water, and hard floors to sleep on at night” (Laws). It’s obvious that in the wild any animal has almost unlimited space to live in. They catch and forage for food naturally and mate naturally.
Thousands of zoos worldwide are visited by citizens yearly to admire and satisfy their curiosity of the beautiful wild animals that mother nature has to offer. Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and have become a known tradition for numerous school field trips and family outings. The ongoing debate between animal rights activists and zoo officials remains, should wild animals be taken from their natural habitats to live in city zoos for education and entertainment purposes?
The debate on storing animals in zoos became controversial, and I came to the final decision that animals do not deserve to live in zoos. Animals are meant to live in their natural habitat, just as humans thrive in their naturally industrialized environment. Living in captivity can also cause the animal’s lifespan to decrease, and it may be due to the failure to satisfy their emotional needs. Human interaction to wildlife and its animals is every expanding, and this probably makes manmade disasters the main cause of the transaction of wild animals from the wild to zoos. On the other hand, zoos have the potential to raise awareness and the support from public donations to fund animal conservation projects, but people do not need to physically see an animal provide their support. Since there are many solutions to this debate, there is no direct answer. From a wild animal’s point of view, humans may be seen as immoral beings with countless evil intentions. What they do not realize is that we have the potential to do good and make big, positive
Animals, particularly the larger ones, are unable to live comfortably in small enclosures. Zoos tend to forget that larger animals have the hardest times getting used to the spaces that they are forced to live in. According to James Nolan’s article, “All the Reasons Why Zoos Should Be Banned”, “…the average lion or tiger has 18,000 times less [space] in captivity than it does in the wild; polar bears a million times less [space]” (7). Although zoos try to recreate their natural habitats, they cannot possibly succeed. The animals, if not born at the zoo, lived in large areas and had all of the freedom that they
Citizens visit thousands of zoos worldwide to admire and satisfy their curiosity of the beautiful wild animals that mother nature has to offer. Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and have become a known tradition for numerous school field trips and family outings. The ongoing debate between animal rights activists along with zoo officials remains to be a question of concern, should wild animals be removed from their natural habitats to live in city zoos for education and entertainment purposes?
(Philadelphia Zoo elephant) At the Denmark zootopia it gives animals a real habitat and the humans get to watch the animals but without the animals knowing. Animals are being trapped in their cage because the cages are too small. (design media lab) In this political cartoon it is showing dumb scientists not knowing why whales are dying and it is because the cages are too small and they are trapped and may not be able to breathe.
Starting thousands of years ago, zoos attracted large crowds around the world (Fravel). Because of that, everyone today has seen, been to, or heard of a zoo at least once in their lifetime. However, people are missing valuable information that they need to know about zoos today. Do the zoos really do what most people think?
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
“It is estimated to be 50 times more expensive to keep an elephant in a zoo than to protect sufficient natural habitat to sustain that elephant and many other animals.” (CAPS, Sad Eyes & Empty Lives- The reality of zoos) Indeed, only if the billions of dollars that spent on building a zoo are optimized to preserve habitats and animal welfare, can our grandchildren still have a chance to see more rare animals by their own eyes.
In conclusion zoos in America are making attempts to accommodate elephants better, the local Sedgwick county zoo is planning to increase to size of the elephants enclosure. All zoos with elephants should either move them to large sanctuaries or release them back into the wild or even increase the enclosure, but no enclosure will be big enough. The cost to increase the size of orca pools would be too costly. Orcas need to be released back into the wild; the risks of keeping them captive outweigh everything else. Instead of using valuable resources on keeping elephants and orcas captive they should be focused on using the resources on protecting the wild ones and their environments.
Reference : Being proud of oneself as a person or being proud of one's physical Appearance: What matters in feeling well in adolescence.
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared to their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts.
A trip to the zoo or aquarium may seem like one of the most thrilling events during childhood. Without notice, naive speculators pay to walk into an animal Jailhouse. “Even the best zoos today are based on captivity and coercion,” says Jon Coe, the legendary zoo designer (Worland). These places of entertainment come across as heaven on earth for the animals, let alone those who get the chance to work with the animals appear to hold the best careers, but behind the names of these animal entertainment industries underlie dangerous and inhumane actions that harm both the animals and humans.