Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Zero tolerance policy case
Essays on zero tolerance policy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Zero tolerance policy case
How much is too much to drink before driving? Although the Zero-Tolerance Law applies to individuals 21 years old and younger, it should apply to all ages, but many individuals argue a few alcoholic beverages do not affect one’s driving skills. Everyday intoxicated individuals get behind the wheel of a car, misjudging their blood alcohol levels causing fatal car crashes. This is a widespread issue so Minnesota should apply the Zero-Tolerance Law to all ages. This law incorporates a DUI immediately if any alcohol is found in one’s blood stream, and if one drives intoxicated, his or her license is automatically suspended by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Each day intoxicated individuals get behind the wheel of cars, thinking they can drive …show more content…
after just a few drinks of alcohol. For many individuals, the answer is not an easy decision to make so that’s why individuals often end up getting behind the wheel buzzed. These individuals do not realize a few alcoholic drinks can affect one’s decisions, emotions, and motor skills. Unfortunately, alcohols effects on individuals can result in car crashes. A study shows buzzed drivers with a blood alcohol level of .01, which is considerably within the legal limit cause many fatal accidents. “Researchers examined more than 570,000 fatal accidents between 1994 and 2011.The results: Drinking and driving with any alcohol in the body is dangerous and leads to more severe accidents.” However, individuals may argue driving buzzed is defined as driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .01-.07, which is under the legal driving limit. But results show that driving buzzed is considerably the same danger as driving drunk. The Zero Tolerance Law should apply to all ages, not just 21, and under because in most individuals one alcoholic beverage can lead to another, leading them to lose track of how much alcohol they had. “Unless you have a breathalyzer in your vehicle, you have no way of knowing what your BAC is before you drive, so if you want to stay safe, don’t drive after drinking, period.” In regards, there are many transportation services and before drinking one should plan. It is understood that some individuals can obtain a few drink and drive safely, but not all individuals can. Eliminating alcohol on the road completely would lower the number of alcohol related traffic deaths significantly considering 10,000 people are killed in impaired driving crashes each year. Another possible solution to this issue, is making all individual’s who drink alcohol own a breathalyzer. This could help prevent drunk driving because blood alcohol levels will be understood before getting behind the wheel of a car. It will save many people’s lives that potentially could be taken by a drunk driver that did not know their blood alcohol level. However, some individuals will argue they know the serving sizes they can handle, but every bar, restaurant, and individual pours alcohol beverages differently. It is almost impossible to know the exact serving size if another individual is pouring the alcoholic beverage because they may accidently over or under pour. Also, alcohol content varies a lot between wine, beer, and hard liquor. It may be difficult for a sober individual to calculate the right serving sizes and a bigger challenge for an intoxicated person to calculate serving sizes. If the alcoholic drinks are not measured correctly their estimated serving size calculation will be wrong which leads many to believe false information. Carrying a breathalyzer will reduce the number of alcohol related traffic deaths each year by giving people awareness of how much alcohol is too much. The best possible solution to lowering the number of alcoholic related traffic deaths is to having zero alcohol apparent in an individual’s body while operating a motor vehicle.
Individuals having a breathalyzer will help lower the number of alcoholic related traffic deaths, but some can be flawed and it is difficult to always have a breathalyzer available considering they cost money. Therefore, it is clear alcohol in driving individuals body continues to be a major factor in fatal car accidents, so why not eliminate alcohol completely from roads? “In 2014, 9,967 people were killed in alcohol-impaired driving crashes, accounting for nearly one-third (31%) of all traffic-related deaths in the United States. “Alcohol and driving simply do not go together. Driving requires one’s attention fully always. While on the road one must be able to react vigorously to the constant changes going on. Driving is a huge responsibility and can be very dangerous and potentially lead to death when drinking alcoholic beverages. They have been too many lives taken from drunk drivers, so why not apply to Zero Tolerance Law to all ages in means of eliminating accidents involving alcohol? Voices of victims involved with alcohol related accidents often said they weren’t thinking or didn’t realize how much they had to drink. Thus, how much is too much to drink before driving? Simply, one drop of alcohol is too much. In other words, the Zero-Tolerance Law should apply to all ages This is a widespread
issue so Minnesota should take control in opposing this law that will help save many 28 people’s lives a day which is a person’s life every 51 minutes that is a crime that could be 100 percent prevented.
I think that it is agreed by all parties that the prodigious number of sober drivers in our neighborhoods, city streets, and country roads is at present deplorable to the state of our great nation. Currently, a whopping ninety-eight percent of Americans of driving age feel threatened by those who drive under the influence of alcohol, which means that only two percent of Americans are able to fully relax and enjoy themselves while on the road, and with the growing awareness, this number could be on the rise (MADD Online: General Statistics 1). What a travesty! All drivers, and passengers alike, should be put at the same risk for danger, be it damage, injury, or death.
If you limit the BAC of 0.05% its drops two drinks or less for small people and three for larger people. If a person’s Body Alcohol Content is 0.05%, it’s about 38% more likely for that person to crash than being sober and the driver’s level is 0.08% is about 169% more likely. On average every hour one person is killed and twenty people are injured. “Crushes have decreased by 50% between 1983 which was 21,113 to 2011 which was 9,878” (Brown).
“Moving the limit from.08 to.05 essentially means that we’d be changing the law so that instead of being arrested for sniffing a beer as you head for the car, you’ll be heading to jail if you look at a beer. These arbitrary laws have been problematic since the beginning, not because we shouldn’t stop people from driving when they are impaired beyond the ability to safely operate a vehicle, but because they are implemented so flatly. Different people respond in different ways to the chemical stimuli of alcohol. Since body weight has such a huge influence on how much of a dose you can handle – in terms of a raw count of number of ounces – the idea of a percentage of blood content was supposed to address that.... ...
The facts are plain and simple, that alcohol and driving do not mix. About three in every ten Americans will be involved in an alcohol related crash at some time in their lives. Every single injury and death caused by drunk driving is totally preventable. To curb this national travesty, concerned Americans need to examine the problems, the effects, and the solutions to drunk driving. First of all, America has had a problem with drunk driving since Ford perfected the assembly line. Alcoholism is a problem in and of itself, but combined with driving can have a wide range of effects. The consequences of this reckless behavior can include a first time DUI or licenses suspension; a small fender bender, or worst of all a deadly crash. Most drivers that have only one or two drinks feel fine, and assume they are in control, which is irresponsible and dangerous. Alcohol is a depressant that slows down the body's ability to react and impairs judgment. To drive well, you need to be able to have a quick reaction time to avoid accidents. Unfortunately, people continue to drink and drive. However,...
“Drink the first. Sip the second slowly. Skip the third. The speedway ends at the cemetery” (Rockne). Every day, almost 30 people in the United States die in motor vehicle crashes that involve an alcohol-impaired driver. This amounts to one death every 48 minutes. The annual cost of alcohol related crashes totals more than 51 billion. In Recent discussions of drunk driving, a controversial issue has been whether the driving while intoxicated laws should be increased due to the amount tax payers are paying for drunk driving crashes. On the one hand. Some argue that the driving laws for driving drunk should remain the same and not change. From this perspective the laws about driving under the influence should greatly increase to be stricter, this will help decrease the death rate per year in the United States. On the other hand, however others argue that the laws about driving while drunk are already too strict and should remain unchanged. In sum, then, the issue is whether the laws about driving drunk should be greatly increased to be more effective, or remain unchanged. Because drunk driving can result in unnecessary and premature deaths, unsafe roadways, billions of dollars spent on taxpayers due to DUI’S, and losing a loved one. Drunk driving laws should be altered to be more efficient.
Before the Drinking age was passed many states had a drinking age of 18 or 19. But the main ways the Minimum Legal Drinking Age (MLDA) got passed was from the Mothers Against Drunk Driving. Passing this act has saved quite of bit of underage accidents still today. Underage drinking has led to 2.7 million injures and 5000 deaths in the US. So with that being said the government needs to take in to consideration the risk of teens drinking and driving, in which they do with adults. In many articles the all said things around the government needs to make teen’s obey an zero tolerance to driving drunk and raise the consequence if they are caught doing so. Which seatbelt and DUI checkpoints have helped a lot to keep the numbers down of alcohol related incidents.
Drunk driving has been an increasing problem for many years. One issue that contributes to this is that in the United States it is actually legal to drive with a certain alcohol percentage. The blood alcohol limit is 0.8 percent (Drunk Driving). This means that a person may drive legally as long as they have a blood alcohol percentage of 0.8 percent or under. However, even at a percentage of 0.3 there may be some impairment of alertness and concentration (Drunk Driving). Driving requires fast reflexes that may be impaired at a 0.5 percent blood alcohol level but a person with this level of intoxication is not legally drinking and driving. Many people are arrested for drunk driving. In 2009, more than 1.4 million drivers were arrested for driving while under the influence (Drunk Driving). In addition, “an average drunk driver has driven drunk 80 times before their first arrest” (Get Involved). Therefore, there were a minimum of 112 million accounts of drunk driving in 2009 alone. Drunk drivers also cause an increasing number of deaths. Drunk drivers in the United States c...
It really is no secret that if the minimum legal drinking age were lowered, a large number of teens would then drink for perhaps the first time. “The age group with the most drivers involved in fatal crashes with Blood Alcohol Content levels of .08 or higher during 2011 was the twenty-one to twenty-four-year-olds” (“National Highway Traffic Facts”). Young adults are just as irresponsible at eighteen as they are at twenty-one, maybe even more irresponsible. The teenagers will indulge themselves on what they feel is a luxury the first chance they get. The young adults abuse the alcohol, and then go driving because even at twenty-one through twenty-four they are still not as responsible. If the age is lowered to eighteen, many eighteen-year-olds will go out and drink alcohol for the first time. The age group may rise to number one in fatal crashes. The National Highway Traff...
In an attempt to combat the issue of DUIs, a national minimum BAC level of 0.02 has also been set for drivers under age twenty one and has reportedly saved hundreds of lives for drivers between the ages of eighteen to twenty years. Educational programs in schools and communities focused on the advantages of using “designated drivers” as well as public education and lobbying groups; such as Mothers against Drunk Driving (MADD) and Students Against Drunk Driving (SADD) have also yielded positive effects in the reduction of DUIs (Levinthal, 2011).
There is a need for the introduction and implementation of new drunk driving laws by the legislature, because presently the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient. The continuous rate of drunken driving fatalities makes a case that the united States drunk driving laws are too lenient and makes a call for stricter laws. According to Valenti “countries with strict drunk driving penalties have a far lower incidence of accidents than the United States (1). The United States being a first world country is weak in enforcing strict punishment for drunk drivers. Valenti is emphasizing on the fact that the united States need to improve their present laws and be firm in enforcing these new laws. There is a need for the United States to improve on their severity of its drunk driving penalties just the way the other part of the world have done and this is giving them a reduced rate of drunk driving fatalities. The claim of the leniency of the United States drunk driving laws is further stated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), this is a prominent body when it comes to the issue of drunken driving fatalities. It claims that the drunken driving laws are severe enough. “Despite great strides in awareness, education and enforcement in the last two decades the United States still has one of the most lenient drunken driving standards in the world”. (NHTSA of existing laws. There is a need for stricter laws to be introduced as the United States ranks behind the world when it comes to effort to combat drunk driving and more efforts need to be put in place by the implementation of harsher laws so as to reduce the high rate of repeat offenders and first time offenders.
Driving under the influence is one of the most common and dangerous situations in which anyone can be or be placed. Drinking and driving is a serious offence that can cause someone to be physically harm or even killed. Not only are you putting yourself at risk but you are also risking the lives of passengers in the car as well as any other car and occupants sharing the road with you. Many people believe that increasing fines for drunk driving offenders will play a compelling role in cutting down the occurrences of driving under the influence. However, while harsher DUI laws will look effective on paper, they will not make a significant step in the fight against drunk driving. Although there is a law enforced for drinking and driving in the
The world is based from two types of laws. Just and unjust laws. In recent years a series of new laws have been adopted. Some of these laws were just and others were unjust. Something that differentiates unjust law from just is it’s an unfairness. In other words, unjust law is something that does not equally apply to everybody. It could be directed to the specific person or group of people. For instance, the law of banning propaganda of homosexuality, making homosexsuals second class citizens who are not entitled to, for example, to express their feelings in public. The law on rallies, forbidding citizens to assemble peacefully and without arms, where they wish. Another, example would be zoning law. Where people have no right of control over
The growing awareness of alcohol hazards has made people more cautious of their drinking habits, particularly young adults. At present young adults have the highest prevalence of alcohol consumption than any other age group. They also drink more heavily, experience more negative consequences, and engage in more harmful activities, specifically drunk driving. Although surveys have documented a decline in recent years, consumption rates remain highest from late teen years to the late twenties (Johnston1-3). Despite the long-term decline since 1982 in alcohol related traffic deaths, a 4 percent increase occurred between 1994 and 1995 among young adults age 21 and over (Hingson 4). As alcohol-impaired driving persists, legal and community initiatives intervene to help reduce the problem, as well as, continuing research on possible solutions.
Stories such as Monique’s prove that there are policies out there that consistently fail to work. One is called zero-tolerance policies, and while these succeed at sending the message that bullying is not tolerated, there are several problems with them. Nora M. Findlay believes, “One of the most serious problems inherent in zero tolerance is that it treats dissimilar problems in a similar way” (14). Secondly, the United States Department of Health and Human Services declares, “Students and teachers may be less likely to report and address bullying if suspension or expulsion is the consequence” (“Support the Kids Involved”). Two other policies that are used but never works is called peer-mediation, and conflict resolution. In “Myths about Bullying”
Firstly in this report, I will be giving the different definitions of rule of law by different philosophers; secondly, I will be applying the rule of law to the English Legal system and thirdly I will be explaining separation of powers with a focus on the impartial judiciary. Finally, I will be using cases to support every detailed point given.