Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Youth crime essay thesis
Nature of crime among the youth
What is the role of women in crime and punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Youth crime essay thesis
The Criminal Justice system is suppose to be a process that helps people receive a sentence which is appropriate for their offence, however this is not the cause for youth. Youth require a qualitatively different response that adult offenders (Minaker & Hogeveen 2009), this is specifically seen in the case of special populations such as criminalized girls and aboriginal youth. A first major concern with a special population is girls and their interaction with the criminal justice system. The adult system is androcentric, meaning that it is based on male behaviour. Specifically because of this many prisons system are not skilled on how to properly handle female offenders, let alone young female offenders. According to Minaker and Hogeveen there are three main differences of young female that need to be taken into consideration, biological differences, the masculinization of female deviance and the gender-role socialization. Biologically, females were destined to bear children and because of this they were not as intelligent as men, because of this the criminalized women is deemed to be unnatural. With the masculinization of deviance, which according to Minaker and Hogeveen argues that, females have become more like men. Finally in relation to gender roles the argument is that without a steady male role in girls lives they do not get the proper socialization they need. When specifically focusing on young girls, their pathways into the criminal justice system need to be addressed and rehabilitated. The three main differences also need to be taken into consideration when sentencing and handling young female offenders. However because of all these considerations majority of officials do not know how to properly handle young girls n... ... middle of paper ... ...porated into the youth system. The only way to learn is to attempt to run different programs in the hopes of having a positive outcome. A key aspect to the betterment of our system is too asked the youth what they specifically want. According to Minaker and Hogeveen youth have stated that it is not one problem but multiple factors, these factors need to be addressed and alternatives need to be found. If the system continues not to listen to the youth there is no hopes for it to have a positive outcome on their lives. The youth criminal justice system needs to shift away from a gendered, all ages approach to a gender specific approach (male or female) and separate systems for the youth and adult offenders. We need to deal with the youth solely not for a solution but through intelligent programming that looks to transform the youth and help them from re-offending.
Young people who face family problems, parental separation in the beginning, lack of support and encouragement by society and lack of self-esteem may end up in the youth justice system. The existing youth justice framework is totally unable to map out the solution where the young offenders can get rid of this all social problems and pass a happy righteous life.
Most young offenders get into trouble with the law only once. But the younger children are when they first break the law, the more likely they are to break the law again (Statistics Canada study, 2005). The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) attempts to acknowledge that different youth need different sentences within the justice system, while ensuring that it is fair and equitable for them. Many people, both in Canada, and around the world, believe that youth are not reprimanded harshly enough for the crimes they commit and that they are, in general, are able to squeeze through the justice system without punishment. Others, believe that the justice system does not treat youth fairly and punishes them without acknowledging that rehabilitation
...ing beckoned in with the 21st century. While U.S.’s JLWOP laws are inconsistent with many human rights treatises and with international law, it is more important for our policies to be based on a thorough understanding of the issue- the most essential being a separation of the processes for juvenile and adult criminal offenders. With an emphasis on rehabilitation for juvenile offenders, and the goal of encouraging maturity and personal development after wayward actions, the futures of many teens in the criminal justice system can become much more hopeful.
Justice systems world-wide employ and enact approaches that are supported by the wider community and government social policy. Exploring social and community expectations on the justice system and the actual theoretical approach behind a sentencing and rehabilitation policy can bring to the light why certain practices are upheld. A social shift towards the practice and implementation of “…restorative justice [practices] (2001) have become mainstream in Australian Juvenile justice and [has] been extended for use with adult offenders…” (Joudo-Larsen, 2014), this approach gains its base from the theory that “…crime causes harm to people, to relationships and to the community…” (Joudo-Larsen, 2014), and that it is not simply an offence against
For instance, its central objective is to rectify youth’s deviance behaviour that poses a threat in society such as committing petty thefts or being involved in frauds and reassuring the faith between the delinquent and the community members. Moreover, the strengths of this program are that it develops a sense of responsibility as “teens are made aware of the consequences of their actions” (Melnychuk, 2014, p.1). According to the media, the utmost influential factor that aids youth from this diversion program is the collaboration between the youth offenders and the victims, which “involves the kids attending either an accountability panel, or depending on the crime and the willingness of victims to be involved, a family conference” (Melnychuk, 2014, p.1). However, there are supplementary weaknesses that jeopardize the existence of diversion programs and their influence on youth offenders. For instance, the Ridge meadows youth diversion program continues to “to scrimp and save to get enough grant dollars to fund its $95, 000 annual budget” (Melnychuk, 2014, p.1). This conveys that diversion programs lack funding in order to attain enhanced resources and having adverse effect on youth offenders since they won’t be able to receive access to the diversion program, resulting in sentence of confinement. Overall, this program has positive influences by developing better relationships with the youth offender’s surroundings but lacks funding that only limits to minimal
Frank leads the Center on Youth Justice’s (CYJ) work on young adult justice within the juvenile and adult justice systems on both a national and state level. “. . . neuroscience now shows young adults in this age group are still developing in important ways. They are forming their identity, learning to better manage their emotions and impulses, and preparing for their life goals. . . prison presents an unnatural social context which creates challenges for young adults to achieve these key developmental milestones.” (Frank). If young adults were to be tried in adult courts they would not only be treated unfairly but this would also affect them in the long run. They wouldn't be able to cope with their adult emotions over the years of their life, their mental development would be stalled due to the challenges presented to them while in prison. However, if they were to be tried in the juvenile justice system, where they rightfully should be, their emotions would be in check and they would be able to receive help from people that are well versed in their situation and most importantly the adolescent brain. These qualified officials such as therapists and mentors will have a positive influence towards
Youthful offenders have a reason for the crimes they have committed. Past life trauma is one of the most common causes for youthful offenders to stand in a criminal court. But the big guys seem to not understand the development of children/teenagers are going through. No matter how critical the crime has appeared, everyone should stop for one second and stand in their shoes. Up until today, youthful offenders, no matter how young they are, they are being treated as adults. Youthful offenders being tried in criminal courts as adults, criminal courts are putting them at risk from the dangers in adult prison facilities. As a result, the past trauma that youthful offenders experienced and were the factors that caused them to commit their crimes;
In England, conforming to the Civitas’s Crime report Youth Crime in England and Wales (2010) the youngest age that someone can be prosecuted is as young as ten years old. It is also mentioned that trailing, patrolling and applying penalties on young offenders costs almost four billion pounds annually. The numbers of first time offences committed by a young person has decrease over the years; according to the Youth Justice Statistics (2014) youth crime is down by 63% since 2002. In regards to the offences themselves, nearly every offence category has decreased in reoccurrence with exception to drug offences declares Civitas’s Youth Crime in England and Wales (2010). The same report states that theft and handling remains the highest volume category taking up 21% of all youth crime. It is shortly followed by violence against a person, 19.5%, and criminal damage, 11.9%. It can be concluded from both aforementioned reports that crime in the UK is decreasing. Contrariwise to this, youth reoffending rates are soaring concludes Civitas’s Youth Crime in England and Wales (2010).
One common misconception is that many people argue that Youth deserve a second chance when committing offences. However, if the consequences were more severe, or enforced the 1st time, more youth would think twice before committing offences repeatedly. The Youth Criminal Justice Act states that, Canadian society should have a youth criminal justice system that commands respect, takes into account the interests of victims, fosters responsibility and ensures accountability through meaningful consequences. (Page 1851 2008 M...
Using Goldson and Muncie’s (2006) examination on “Youth Justice with Integrity” (pp. 99-102), my proposed essay will argue that section 38 and section 39 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) should be questioned. My essay will argue that overrepresentation of Aboriginal youth in custody is unacceptable as extrajudicial measures and sanctions provide an effective way to handle troubled youth compared to custody, especially for youth that display a willingness to obey and genuine remorse for their actions (s. 38(2)(d); s. 39(3)(b)). Unfortunately, the reliance on custody has led many Aboriginal people having low confidence in the criminal court system as one-third of Aboriginals come in some form of contact with the criminal justice system
Youth justice is a creature of historical development. The structure of the industry is full of dominant philosophies which have seeped into the foundations, which still monopolise and govern contemporary practice and although new perspectives have emerged over the recent history, it is necessary to trace the evolution over the last century to understand the logic behind the practice.
Youth justice is a complex concern. There are many different ways to approach it — and just like anything else, everyone believes that their model is the most effective for reducing crime. Q’oranka Kilcher, an American actor once said “[…] it’s important for us as a society to remember that the youth within juvenile justice systems are, most of the time, youths who simply haven 't had the right mentors and supporters around them - because of circumstances beyond their control.” This seems fair. Youth may not be able to control their circumstances, but should they be responsible for their own actions and be punished? Or, should they be supported and encouraged in order to get rehabilitated? Different opinions influence different models. Four
How safe are teens wherever they go? Despite many people's attempts, teen violence is something that hasn't completely come to an end. Recently, 59% of students in grades six through twelve knew where to get a gun if they wanted one, according to the Harvard School of Public Health. The U.S. Surgeon General shows that each year, students spend $5.5 billion on alcohol, perhaps the cause of many violent crimes committed by them. Northeastern University's College of Criminal Justice reports that from 1985 to 1993, murders committed by people between the ages of 14-17 increased 165%. Certain adult crimes on the other hand, have decreased. There are many organizations out there that help prevent teen violence, some which include the National Alliance For Safe Schools, Mothers Against Teen Violence, The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence, and more. Is there anything else though, that we can do to prevent teen violence from escalating to an even higher level?
When today's youth commit crimes it is often the taxpayers that have to pay for it. In many cases, when the crimes include damage to property, theft of personal belongings or merchandise the public are required to pay for the damages through taxes and raised prices in stores. When it comes to theft, the public would be required to pay more money in the long run for a product that is often stolen due to the rate of loss on it. When it comes to property damage we, the owners, are responsible for replacing what has been damaged and paying to replace or repair the item from our own pockets, or to place claims using house or automobile insurance, causing our premiums to rise. Youth crime rates seem to have been increasing over the past couple of years. Most crimes these days are committed by youths who are often under the influence of drugs and alcohol, who have an impaired sense of perception. Police Chief Julian Fantino of the Toronto Police Service says, "Youth crime rates have been rising in recent years even though other violent crime rates have been decreasing," (www.cbc.ca). With youth crime on the rise we the public are forced to pay increasingly for their mistakes.
Crime is a very universal and complex situation in our society today, humanity has grown with the concept of crime as being an act that is unacceptable in society. Today the topic of crime is seen as an ongoing topic or debate for many professions around the world, in particular one of the most looked upon topics, how can crime be processed in an acceptable way for the youth? Individuals within the ages of 12-17 legally fall under the youth criminal justice act or better known as YCJA, is it now the ongoing controversy that has erupted since the YCJA has been introduced in 2003. The constant debate on whether YCJA is appropriate when it comes to youth and crime or whether it is too lenient in regards to youth offenders, with clear analysis