Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Catch-22 by Joseph Heller doesn't use irony
Postmodernism and modernism
Postmodernism and modernism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Catch-22 by Joseph Heller doesn't use irony
Sanjay Sood
Mrs. Dominick
AP English Lang and Comp
28 September 2013
Outline
I
A.) Thesis: The intriguing novel Catch-22 by Joseph Heller contains a fragmented structure, nontraditional hero, and varying tones that make it an enduring piece of postmodernism, while remaining critical of World War II through a unique and baffling plot.
II
A.) Topic Sentence: Yossarian’s development as an anti-hero throughout the novel contributes to its postmodern classification.
B.) Primary Quote: “Actually, the pain in his liver had gone away, but Yossarian didn’t say anything and the doctors never suspected … Yossarian had everything he wanted in the hospital” (Heller 7).
C.) Secondary Quote: " Starting with the opening page in which Captain Yossarian, the book's non-hero, is goldbricking in a hospital bed and censoring letters” (Hasley).
D.) Closing Sentence: The characteristics that define Yossarian also contribute to the massive amounts of irony found in the novel.
III
A.) Topic Sentence: Heller’s plentiful use of irony in Catch-22 creates the atmosphere for a postmodern work.
B.) Primary Quote: “‘Racial prejudice is a terrible thing, Yossarain. It really is. It’s a terrible thing to treat a decent, loyal Indian like a nigger, kike, wop or spic’ Chief White Halfoat nodded” (Heller 44).
C.) Secondary Quote: “[Catch-22] It recreates and mocks, simultaneously, the tradition of ironic and grim war fiction that culminated in the separate peace sought by Ernest Hemingway's characters” (Solomon).
D.) Closing Sentence: The ironic statements made by many of the characters throughout the novel leads into the underlying theme of absurdity.
IV
A.) Topic Sentence: The absurdity of the rules set forth by administrations in Catch-22 furthers the nove...
... middle of paper ...
... by its provisions” (Kazin).
D.) Closing Sentence: The novel’s use of paradoxes sets the stage for further character development.
VIII
A.) Topic Sentence: Many of the character’s moral standards are augmented by the harsh choices they are forced to make; these morals display the skepticism associated with postmodernism.
B.) Primary Quote: “It was the face of a man of hardened integrity who could no more consciously violate the moral principles on which his virtue rested than he could transform himself into a despicable toad. One of these moral principles was that it was never a sin to charge as much as the traffic could bear” (Heller 64).
C.) Secondary Quote: “Properly understood, the structure of Catch-22 points up the need for an effective moral response to the injustices of the modern social order” (Merrill).
D.) Closing Sentence: The morals of the characters
Catch-22 follows the protagonist, Yossarian’s experience during WWII. However, the book is nowhere near chronological and jumps from different time periods of Yossarian’s service in the military. The novel depicts many events of where Yossarian
"At the very end of the novel- what is represented as being important? Find two quotes to illustrate this".
Heller, Joseph. "Chapter 21." Catch-22. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2004. 210. Print.
This toxic and deceitful environment is shocking, especially because the book focuses on the united states military. The tone of Catch-22 is vastly different from the other glamorous patriotic war novels of the time. Instead of focusing on glamorous, fictionalized tales of heroism, Catch-22 focuses on corruption and deception, and more importantly how Yossarian begins to see the war and all of its lies. This is how the novel begins to reveal one of its most important messages. It focuses on lies and suffering and reveals the real intentions of deceitful officers who justify their actions because its “for the good of the country”. Through this focus on corruption, lies and broken promises Yossarian begins to realize that war is not glamorous, no one fights or dies for their country, they fight and die on the orders of uncaring commanding officers. As Yossarian realizes the horrible truth of war, he helps convey it to the readers, constantly commenting on the futility of their fight, questioning orders like the bombing of an innocent village, and mourning is friends senseless death. He further shows his opinions of war by constantly trying to avoid conflict, faking injuries, fleeing to Rome and trying to have himself removed from active duty. Yossarian constantly criticizes his generals and is instrumental in helping the reader realize just how little they care about the war or their soldiers, more focused on their own personal glory, shown through Sheisskopf’s obsession with awards and parades and Cathcarts constant raising of flight missions required. These men risk nothing while putting young soldiers in unnecessary and life threatening situations just to raise their own status. Yossarian and Catch-22 use corruption and deceit to reveal a much larger lie, there is no honor in war, men kill and die for an uncaring commanding officer, not for freedom or their
As the irony continues this allows the reader to develop feelings and opinions towards the characters. No matter if one may have
In Catch-22, opposite Miller's The Crucible, Joseph Heller utilizes his uncanny wit to present a novel fraught with dark, satiric comedy tied up in a relatively formless plot. The character of Nately acts as a focal point for many of the humorous oxymoronic criticisms contained within Catch-22, as "Nately had a bad start. He came from a good family" (Heller 34), and he ".was the finest, least dedicated man in the whole world" (35). Proliferating Catch-22, satirical dark comedy appears in every chapter, even in the depiction of death (Cockburn 179): ".McWatt turned again, dipped his wings in salute, decided, oh, what the hell, and flew into a mountain"(Heller 157). Furthermore, the plot of Catch-22 follows a cyclical structure in that repetitions of particular events recur in a planned randomness, an oxymoron that pays tribute to Catch-22 itself (Merrill 205-209). A recurring structure within Heller's novel defining his ...
Ambiguity in literature after World War II reflects and explores issues of self and society. These two ideas often work against each other instead of coexisting to form a struggle-free existence. J. D. Salinger, Sylvia Plath, and Richard Heller illustrate this struggle with their works. These authors explore ambiguity through different characters that experience the world in different ways. Identity, while it is an easy concept, can be difficult to attain. These authors seek out ambiguity with the human experience, coming to different conclusions. Ambiguity becomes a vehicle through which we can attempt to define humanity. J. D. Salinger’s novel, Catcher in the Rye, Sylvia Plath’s novel, The Ball Jar, and Richard Heller’s novel, Catch 22 explore ambiguity experienced through an attempt to find self. Each experience is unique, incapable of fitting a generic mold created by society.
In conclusion, many times throughout the book, Farenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, literary devices like irony are used to contribute to the theme and book, by connecting two opposite ideas. These can be expressed through the misuse of portraying simple actions or people, connecting our world to the communities in Farenheit 451, and examples of power struggles between the antagonist and protagonist forces. Irony is used constantly as a method of secretly helping us relate to the book, and giving deeper meanings to simple phrases that can represent the themes of this book.
Themes of Slaughterhouse 5 by Kurt vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller In the books, Slaughter House 5 by Kurt Vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller there are many themes that at first don’t appear to be related but once given a closer look have striking similarities. Both books are about one mans experience through World War II, one being a fighter pilot and another being a soldier. Each man is known as an anti-war hero. They do not agree with the war and do not find it appropriate to fight for it.
Another interesting factor about this story is the irony and tone in this story and how it adds toward each character.
In conclusion, many examples are given throughout the novel that exemplifies all three types of irony: situational, verbal, and dramatic. There are many more examples, like Bernard wanting attention and John’s suicide. His suicide can be an example of irony, with the reader hoping that John (the revolutionist) might succeed, but John taking his own life. Irony plays a huge role in the book, pointing out that no society can be perfect and that some laws are broken by the creators themselves.
reflects upon the theme of the novel. As it highlights the fact that if people in the society
The rational facility of man cannot successfully be revealed, in its entirety, through literal and direct language. Recognizing this reality generated by the nature of such a faculty, Wright utilizes a variety of rhetorical devices, indirect in their capabilities, to establish a realistic and all-encompassing paradigm throughout his story. Consequently, Wright uses irony to shape his characters. Such a methodology is primarily revealed when the writer, assuming the ignorance of his wife, discuss the circumstances intended for her untimely end. Developing exceptional situational qualities, irony is used once more during Lucy’s execution of her dead husband’s plot. Furthermore, that same situational irony is present at the murder of her husband.
...and through an unfolding of events display to the reader how their childhoods and families past actions unquestionably, leads to their stance at the end of the novel.
Lorcher, Trent. “Irony in ‘The Story of an Hour’.”Bright Hub Education.N.p., 17 Apr. Web. 17 Mar 2014