Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Psychology of a serial killer
The psychology of serial killers
Psychology behind serial killers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Psychology of a serial killer
Yoo Young-Chul, a self-confessed serial killer and cannibal, was born in Gochang County, South Korea on April 18, 1970. Chul confessed to the murders of 21 people, who were predominantly prostitutes and wealthy elderly men. The Seoul Central District Court convicted Chul of 20 murders, where one of his cases was dismissed on a technicality. In an article entitled, Suspected Serial Killer Nabbed”, it is stated, “Yoo burned three and mutilated at least 11 of his victims, admitting he ate the livers of some of them”. Chul’s crimes were committed between the dates of September 2003 and July 2004. Chul was subsequently arrested and sentenced to death on December 13, 2004. Chul was born as the fourth child into a misfortunate family of three brothers …show more content…
Chul would then mutilate the dead bodies and sometimes consume them. Because of Chul’s fear of epilepsy, he would eat the livers and brains of his victims. Chul’s procedures for killing prostitutes were similar despite the fact that they took place in his home. Chul would the call the prostitutes to his home, and after having sex with them he would bludgeon, mutilate, and dispose of their bodies in the mountains surrounding the city. He would be sure to bury the bodies while the weather was warm in order to speed up the process of decomposition. Chul was taken into custody on July 2004, and confessed to the murders of all 21 of his victims. Police admitted that they had minimal evidence linking Chul to chain of murders because of his meticulous and well-organized executions of his crimes. Chul’s first appearance in court was on September 6, 2004, where he refused to defend himself. He bragged about having no intention of stopping, and that if it were not for being arrested he would have killed more people. Prosecutors requested that Chul be sentenced to the death penalty, in which he thanked them for. Chul was subsequently sentenced to death on December 13, 2004 for 20 counts of
On February 25th, 2000, Adnan Syed was convicted of murdering his ex-girlfriend, Hae Min Lee, via manual strangulation six weeks prior. Brutal right? So are false convictions. Adnan Syed did not murder Hae Min Lee nor did he have anything to do with her death. However, without a doubt, Jay Wilds, his alleged partner in crime, was involved.
A University of San Diego professor whose daughter’s disappearance become a recurring factor in his life, has finally gotten the peace he deserves. After approximately five years of three unsolved murders, assailant David Allen Lucas, was convicted and sentenced to death. Lucas was a carpet cleaner from Spring Valley, CA and was 23 when he first committed a murder, but this was not his first time being convicted. In 1973, at the age of 18 Lucas was incarcerated after being convicted of raping a 21-year-old maid who had worked for a family friend.
Damien Echols is found guilty and sentenced to death for the crime of killing three eight-year old boys; for eighteen years he spends his life on Death Row before he is released. Before being placed on Death Row at Varner Super Max Security Unit in Grady, Arkansas and Tucker Max Security Unit, Echols also spent time in Crittenden County Jail on misdemeanor charges he received as minor. While on Death Row, Damien explains that it was the guards that he had to watch out for and not the other prisoners. The visits from spiritual advisors as well as the media caused Echols to receive hatred from the guards. They destroyed everything in his cell, planted a knife in his bunk, sent to solitary confinement for no reason, beat up by a team of five guards, and one day he was taken to the warden’s office where he was choked while the warden lectured him on how “sick” he was.
sentenced to spend the rest of his life in prison. The case against him was largely
The crime he committed was terrible and obviously something that could only be done with someone who lacks any good intentions. His behavior during the his trial also showed the extent of his maliciousness. He half-heartedly attempted to defend himself by claiming the prosecutors were using false evidence and that, according the records of the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, “Nobles concludes that he was denied the fundamentally fair and impartial trial guaranteed him by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment”. He put very little effort into defending himself during the trial and was quickly sentenced to death. In the early years of his time in prison he was far from the ideal prisoner. Earle presents how “He once broke away from guards while returning to his cell from the exercise yard and climbed the exposed pipes and bars in the cell block, kicking down television sets suspended outside on the bottom tier.” and on another occasion he cut himself just so he could hit an officer while they were attending to him before he passed out. This kind of behavior was completely eradicated long before he was executed, procuring him the respect of the prison
Mao Zedong was born December 26, 1893 and lived until September 9 in 1976 when he died in Beijing China. Mao Zedong died from the Motor neuron disease. Mao Zedong was born into a peasant family in the place Shoshanna near Hunan. During the years of 1928 throughout 1931. Mao Zedong and others that worked with Mao Zedong established armies in the hinterlands and created the Red Army which was known as the most feared “army” in china during the time of the revolution.
An analysis of the most famous murderers and serial killers in the Chicago area shows varying degrees of psychopathy or mental illnesses, which ultimately contribute to homicidal conduct. Analysis also shows that the paths of serial killers have a tendency to converge.... ... middle of paper ... ...
The ideal victim in this case was young white boys who were preyed upon by the usage of two young white boys. Corll would employee two young boys by the name of David Brooks and Elmer Wayne Henley Jr. to lure young white boys to his home to be raped, tortured, and then murdered. Henley was at the time 17 years old when he was lured to the home of Corll, by Brooks as a victim. My thought is Corll found Henley to be more useful alive than dead. Corll did not rape, torture or kill Henley he instead hired him on as a recruiter to assist Brooks in finding more potential victims. Considering Brooks and Henley’s age and the fact that they were in school and knew many kids, they became the perfect duo in Corll’s eyes to assist him in finding potential victims. Henley and Brooks did just that, they would lure in their own friends and classmates, in promises of smoking marijuana and drinking directly to Corll’s home and eventually after a tremendous amount of torture, to their deaths. Corll had a type of victim he sought. He only wanted white males, never females, and their ages ranged from 13-20. Most of the victims were abducted from Houston Heights located in downtown Houston, which was also were Corll’s family business was located at the time. The victims were then brought back to Corll’s home were they were bound, gagged and tied to Corll’s torture board. Corll would then rape, torture and eventually strangle or shoot and kill the young teens. Afterwards Brooks and/or Henley
The first to be convicted were three men guilty of executing three people on March 13, 1982 during the Massacre of Rio Negro (“Guatemala hands down first sentences for civil war crimes”). The trial took place in a court in the central province of Baja Verapaz, which allowed for controversy to arise (“Guatemala hands down”). The people wanted justice and agreed with Aura Elena’s statement "We are not seeking vengeance, but rather that this massacre not go unpunished ... that is why we trust justice will be done," (“Guatemala hands down”). The trial resulted in a sentence to death by lethal injection for all three men (“Guatemala hands down”). Guilty military personnel continued to be convicted over the following
"The Innocence Project - Cameron Todd Willingham: Wrongfully Convicted and Executed in Texas." The Innocence Project - Cameron Todd Willingham: Wrongfully Convicted and Executed in Texas. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Cameron_Todd_Willingham_Wrongfully_Convicted_and_Executed_in_Texas.php.
He was arrested for aggravated assault, and charged with shooting two off duty police officers in Atlanta in 1993, but the charges were later dropped (bomp). He was also accused of beating a limousine driver in Los Angeles and found guilty of threatening a fellow rapper with a baseball bat in Michigan. He was then found guilty of sexual abuse in 1994 and was serving up to 4 12 years in prison (bomp).
'Serial murder'; has long been a term used to describe those human beings that repeatedly commit heinous crimes. It is rare that the average person probes the mind of a serial killer without bias. However, what lies behind the eyes of a serial killer deserves more than the cold hard look that society so often gives (Aaronson, Inter...
Mass Murderers and Serial Killers are nothing new to today’s society. These vicious killers are all violent, brutal monsters and have an abnormal urge to kill. What gives people these urges to kill? What motivates them to keep killing? Do these killers get satisfaction from killing? Is there a difference between mass murderers and serial killers or are they the same. How do they choose their victims and what are some of their characteristics? These questions and many more are reasons why I was eager to write my paper on mass murderers and serial killers. However, the most interesting and sought after questions are the ones that have always been controversial. One example is; what goes on inside the mind of a killer? In this paper I will try to develop a better understanding of these driven killers and their motives.
It was 1993, the day Leonel Herrera was executed for a crime he did not commit. (Leonel Torres Herrera, 1) Leonel had been convicted of murdering two police officers eleven years earlier in 1882. He waited for his execution day for ten years before new evidence arose that was not present during his trial. Several advocates came forward stating that Herrera’s brother, Raul, had confessed to killing the officers before his death in 1984. Raul’s son said he witnessed the killings when he was nine years old. Despite this new evidence, Texas courts refused to reopen the case. They said that the evidence was just too late. (“The Progressive”) Leonel Herrera was executed one year later. Leonel Herrera was killed because of a crime he did not commit