Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dystopian fiction analysis
Dystopian fiction analysis
Dystopian texts essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
To begin, The book WE, by Yevgeny Zamyatin is a dystopian novel set in the future. Written by the main Character D-503 as a Journal. We learn in that D-503 is a mathematician with the task of building a spaceship called the Integral. The purpose for the Integral we learn is for the purpose of spreading their way of life to other planets. Their way of life which includes their belief system of equality for all, and limiting freedom drastically all for the purpose of the overall happiness of everyone in OneState. Violating any laws in OneState is punishable, most commonly with the death penalty. The death penalty is common in OneState where the Benefactor does the executions himself, held in ceremonial form in front of the public. Continuing further into the book we also see …show more content…
For example, D-503 describes the feelings he gets attending the Benefactor’s execution ceremony stating, “Judging by the descriptions that have come down to us, this is something like what the ancients felt during their ‘divine service.’ But they serve their irrational, unknown God, whereas we serve something rational and very precisely known (45). Here D-503 is comparing the feeling he gets from attending the Benefactors execution ceremonies to what he has understood about the feeling people gained from attending a divine service from the past. Going as far as to say that the people of the past worshiping god was irrational, where as his worshipping of OneSate and the Benefactor is rational. D-503 comparing the Benefactors execution ceremony to that of a divine service shows how there are similarities in a ceremony to worship god to the ceremony in the book worshipping the Benefactor. Thus showing how the citizens attending the ceremony gives a sense of worshipping toward the Benefactor, and contradicting their idea of equality for
The short story “The Death of Ivan Ilych” is about a man who realizes he is dying and that no one in his life cares about him. Even more disappointing for Ivan is the realization that besides his success as a high court judge, he has done nothing else to make his life worth saving. The death of Ivan Ilyich, sadly, comes as a release of stress to all. In the end, Ivan is soothed by the release of death, his family and friends are relieved of having responsibility of Ivan taken off their shoulders, and the reader is released from the stressful journey. Tolstoy teaches the audience through the structural elements of the “black sack” metaphor and pathos about the unavoidability of death and the relief of accepting it.
In the first chapter of God Behaving Badly, David Lamb argues that God is unfairly given a bad reputation. He claims these negative perceptions are fueled by pop culture and lead many to believe the lie that the God of the Old Testament is angry, sexist, racist, violent, legalistic, rigid, and distant. These negative perceptions, in turn, affect our faith. Ultimately, Lamb seeks to demonstrate that historical context disproves the presumptuous aforementioned. In addition, he defends his position by citing patterns of descriptions that characterize God throughout the Old Testament. “Our image of God will directly affect how we either pursue or avoid God. If we believe that the God of the Old Testament is really harsh, unfair and cruel, we won’t want anything to do with him” (Lamb 22). Clearly, they way Christians choose to see God will shape their relationship with Him.
The problem of reconciling an omnipotent, perfectly just, perfectly benevolent god with a world full of evil and suffering has plagued believers since the beginning of religious thought. Atheists often site this paradox in order to demonstrate that such a god cannot exist and, therefore, that theism is an invalid position. Theodicy is a branch of philosophy that seeks to defend religion by reconciling the supposed existence of an omnipotent, perfectly just God with the presence of evil and suffering in the world. In fact, the word “theodicy” consists of the Greek words “theos,” or God, and “dike,” or justice (Knox 1981, 1). Thus, theodicy seeks to find a sense of divine justice in a world filled with suffering.
The myths which prove the contradictory behavior of the gods, acting as both benefactors and tormentors of man, can readily be explained when viewed in light of the prime directive for man, to worship the gods and not “overstep,” and the ensuing “Deus ex Mahina” which served to coerce man to fulfill his destiny as evidenced by the myths: “Pandora,” “Arachne, and “Odysseus.” Humankind and it’s range of vision over the gods beauty and power portrayed them to be benefactors but unseemingly it depicted their affliction towards humans.
He declares that the “ancestors, the Christians, worshipped entropy as they worshipped God” (159). The ancestors, the savages, worshipped the tendency towards a chaotic world. They were drawn to the gradual decline into disorder and the fact everything will eventually fall apart, which would ultimately bring their world’s demise. What does this then say about the God the Christians followed with such fervor? Zamyatin attempts to persuade the readers that a God worthy of such followers is not interested in a thriving society, but rather only in His own amusement at the cost of humanity. Yet, “this is still the God who has been worshipped for centuries as the God of love” (206). In a climatic conversation with the protagonist, the Benefactor justifies the cruelties of OneState by comparing Himself to the Christian God. The Benefactor argues that His unexplainable actions are for the good of mankind, just as the ancestors would argue that “God works in mysterious ways,” even when those actions are not immediately beneficial towards its citizens. The “Christian, all merciful God—the one who slowly roasts in the fires of Hell all those who rebel against him—is he not called the executioner” (206)? The Benefactor compares Himself to the old God, claiming that He too uses his power to punish all those who sin against OneState. The text reveals that He is proud to be the supreme leader of OneState, and to be the execution of the state. Zamyatin uses direct metaphors to show that just as OneState follows a totalitarian regime controlled by a power mad ruler, Christianity has also deteriorated into a totalitarian
There are over sixty offenses in the United States of America that can be punishable by receiving the death penalty (What is..., 1). However, many individuals believe that the death penalty is an inadequate source of punishment for any crime no matter how severe it is. The fact remains, however, that the death penalty is one of the most ideal forms of punishment. There are other individuals who agree with the idea that capital punishment is the best form of punishment. In fact, some of these individuals believe that this should be the only form of punishment.
The Death Penalty practice has always been a topic of major debate and ethical concern among citizens in society. The death penalty can be defined as the authorization to legally kill a person as punishment for committing a crime, this practice is also known as Capital Punishment. The purpose of creating a harsher punishment for criminals was to deter other people from committing atrocious crimes and it was also intended to serve as a way of incapacitation and retribution. In fact, deterrence, incapacitation, and retribution are some of the basic concepts in the justice system, which explain the intentions of creating punishments as a consequence for illegal conduct. In the United States, the Congress approved the federal death penalty on June 25, 1790 and according to the Death Penalty Focus (DPF, 2011) organization website “there have been 343 executions, two of which were women”.
Have you ever wondered why people are so interested to learn about the suffrage of others? Over twenty-five years, the population of prisoners has nearly sextulped. Reaching about 1.7 million since 1996, which is almost equal to the population to Houston, Texas, the fourth largest city in the nation (Elliott Currie). All we focus on is how they did it? and why? In other words, many people interpret crime as entertainment, and don’t think about the negative effects taking place in the world or even more that individual. In some cases the innocent are being accused of unlikely punishment but how do they determine? Considerably, the death penalty has been the topic of discussion these past years. This so called “penalty” is becoming the prime consequence in most cases. I think that the use of the death penalty as punishment is wrong because of the psychological effects it has on prisoners, time spent on death row in cases of innocents, and the costly outcome.
Since the 13 colonies were first established in America, the death penalty has been the main form of capital punishment as a firmly deep-rooted institution in the United States. Today, one of the most debated issues in the criminal justice system is the issue of capital punishment. While receiving disapproving viewpoints as those who oppose the death penalty find moral fault in capital punishment, the death penalty has taken a very different course in America while continuing to further advancements in the justice system since the start of the new millennium. While eliminating overcrowding in state jails, the death penalty has managed to save tax payers dollars as well as deteriorate crime and apprehend criminals.
The United States guarantees the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; however, if the death penalty is legal, the same country which promises life, has the ability to take it away. If a person were to commit first degree murder, take part in terrorism, or commit an act of espionage, they would be faced with capital punishment. Many Americans disagree with the death penalty because of the high expense of death, the possibility of innocent people murdered, and the amount of crime deterred by the elimination of the death penalty. However, many citizens realize the advantages to the death penalty such as, prison escapees who might commit more crimes, a potential solution to overcrowded prisons, and a way for victims’ families
This displays that the gods keep humans best interest in mind. For example, the myth of The Wandering of Io, Zeus decided to be unfaithful to his wife Hera with a human named Io in order please himself . Zeus transformed Io into a cow in order to hide his affair from his wife, and protect Io from Hera’s dangerous behavior that will result from jealousy . As a human, Io is more subjective to be a victim and therefore left in harm’s way. Zeus might have done wrong by having an affair but acknowledged that Hera was his problem and not Io’s, so he turned her into a cow in order to avoid further complication for Io.
Ezorsky, G. (1972). Philosophical Perspectives on Punishment. Justice and Punishment. Albany, New York. State University of New York. Print.
Vygotsky was a soviet psychologist from 1896-1934. He mainly contributed in the developmental psychology by proposing on theory that connects to the children development. He proposed a theory on the development or higher cognitive functions especially in the children, which he saw the emergence of some reasoning form the practical activities that children are participating in the social environment, especially through playing (Jones, & Reynolds, 1992). He has had many arguments in aligning to reasoning and cognitive development, the first in the earlier stages being the argument that, reasoning development is mediated by the symbols and signs that a person sees in everyday life. This means, they are connected very
Durkheim sees the role of law and punishment to be important for the solidarity of society as a whole. (Ibid., p81) Here, society has a...
Punishing the unlawful, undesirable and deviant members of society is an aspect of criminal justice that has experienced a variety of transformations throughout history. Although the concept of retribution has remained a constant (the idea that the law breaker must somehow pay his/her debt to society), the methods used to enforce and achieve that retribution has changed a great deal. The growth and development of society along with an underlying, perpetual fear of crime are heavily linked to the use of vastly different forms of punishment that have ranged from public executions, forced labor, penal welfarism and popular punitivism over the course of only a few hundred years.