Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dracula book and movie comparison
Essay on dracula
Literary elements bram stoker's dracula
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dracula book and movie comparison
Dracula compares to King Kong on a lot of levels I think one of the main ones is the fear level that he brings but also that same fascination to those around him. King Kong enters New York and people hear about him and are frightened but come to the showing any way out of curiosity and I feel like the characters in the book, especially Lucy for example, are afraid and can feel the danger but are drawn to him anyway because he’s new and exotic and they want to be around him.
There are several examples of xenophobia throughout the story and a lot of it comes in the beginnings while Jonothan is starting his journey. In chapter 1 page 5 Jonothan states “The strangest figures we saw were the Slovaks, who were more barbarian than the rest, with their big cow-boy hats, great baggy dirty-white
…show more content…
trousers…” and he goes on to discuss how disgusting and barbaric the Slovaks are with extreme distaste.
There is a lot of fear of the group turning into monsters like Dracula, when Lucy becomes ill the text states “Lucy’s eyes in form and color; but Lucy’s eyes unclean and full of hell-fire, instead of the pure, gentle orbs we knew” (pg. 234). Lastly Dracula throughout the book monstrously kills innocent people and each time he is depicted as a monster with no mercy towards whoever he is attacking.
Freud defines uncanny as something that is frightening and familiar and Dracula to me is the exact definition of that fear mixed with curiosity. Dracula embodies the fear of cultural passing, like we discussed in class, the thought of him being able to move within society undetected is terrifying because now there’s this monster walking among us that could attack at any time.I
think this relates not only to the time Stoker wrote this in but also now when there’s so many multicultural families and so much diversity, and people trying harder than ever to keep them out. Just take Donald Trump for example, another fear that comes along with this is if the other is walking among us and is one of us then all those horrible things that I said to them or about them can be applied to me as well. Since Dracula represents the other I think he also represents a sexual attraction to other races that was just not allowed in those times and is still frowned upon in a way during our current times. For example when Jonothan encounters the vampire women he is intrigued but suddenly ‘snaps back to reality’ when he realizes what he’s doing. I think Dracula also represents a violent side to our culture, the side that would just retaliate with no mercy or think about the consequence for any behavior that they see fit. Reading the story I feel like Dracula thinks himself above mankind and I think that attitude can apply when dealing with someone or an entire culture that you don’t like and it’s possible that rage he feels to allow him to kill innocent people can be applied to a lot of people in society. Not to the extreme of ripping heads and biting necks but that urge to destroy. One of the reasons I think this is significant is because it has to do with the attraction and desire for other ethnicities and for the desire for something more. I think Lucy’s behavior and comments like ‘who needs more than one man’ can kind of be related to women attempting to do more outside of the household or not do what is traditional. Not to the point of the women’s rights movements but I think Lucy is an extreme dramatization at the male look at what happens when women aren’t married and in the home. Stoker sort of portrays her as a sex crazed women who abandons all common sense because she’s attracted to Dracula and this is what independent women do. Mina is never overly sexualized like Lucy and she’s basically the definition of what a Victorian women should be and I feel like that’s why she is given the intelligence of a ‘mans brain’ and takes a greater role in the book for example helping Van Helsing. A strong bond forms between Helsing, Seward, Holmwood and Morris, so much so Mina and Jonothan name their child after them. A really tight friendship and family type bond forms between them as they all rally together to kill this monster who killed their friend. Lucy takes the role of the motivator to find and kill Dracula to avenge her death and Mina takes the role of the brain and the steam that gets them moving in the right direction. Vampirism is light an infectious disease in that it’s transferred from person to person, makes them ill and eventually kills them and in this case turning them into a ravenous monster. In this story it comes from an outsider that’s described as dirty and filthy and it also comes on ships where Dracula has murdered the crew.
There is a classic "good versus evil" plot to this novel. The evil of course being Count Dracula and the Good being represented by the Harkers, Dr. Seward and Lucy, Arthur, Quincy and the Professor. It is the continuing battle between Dracula and the forces of good. Good in this case is the Christian God. The battle is foretold by the landlady where she says, "It is the eve of St Georges Day. Do you no know that tonight, when the clock strikes midnight, all the evil things in the world will have full sway?" and she hands Harker a crucifix (p 12).
Lucy poses a threat to the Victorian ideology by exposing herself as a danger to sexual propriety. She remarks about wanting to have more than one husband, which displays promiscuity, “Why can’t they let a girl marry three men or as many as want her?” this statement works as a threat which comes to fruition after Lucy is bitten. Once infected by Dracula, Lucy becomes sexually overt and aggressive; and is portrayed as a monster and a social outcast. She transforms into a fiend and feeds on children making her the maternal antithesis as well as a child molester.
Throughout many types of literature, violence exists to enhance the reader’s interest in order to add a sense of excitement or conflict to a novel. This statement withholds much truthfulness due to the fact that without violence in a piece of literature such as Dracula by Bram Stoker, the plot would not have the same impact if it were lacking violence. So to holds true to that of the movie. The movie bares different characteristics then that of the book. First off, the whole ordeal with the wolf escaping and jumping into Lucy’s, room and Lucy’s mom having a heart attacked is never even mention in the movie. Second, The night when the four men go to Lucy’s grave and find it empty is stated both in the book and in the movie however what unfolds after this is different. Finally, the end of the book differs severely from what Francis Ford Copolas rendition and that of the Bram Stoker see it to be. The differences are as follows…
Religion was the core of his tale, and modeled it. On one side were the humans and on the other Dracula. Through their struggles to defeat the monster, they experienced changes in gender roles, which was also present in real time.
Comparing the 1931 version of Dracula, starring Bela Lugosi, with Frances Ford Coppola's Bram Stoker's Dracula 1993 version yields some similarities. Both films are of the same genre: Horror. Both films are set around the same time period. Also, both deal with a vampire coming to England and causing disruptions in people's lives. Beyond these few similarities are numerous contrasts.
First a major difference is sunlight does not affect the vampires in Twilight. The only thing the sun does to them is making them glow like glitter is on them. In Dracula the vampires are very weak when they get into the sun. Next big difference that you usually do not see in vampires is in Twilight they show up in pictures and mirrors. In Dracula it is shown when Jonathan was shaving that Dracula could not be seen in the mirror (29-30). The final difference between Dracula and Twilight is Holy items do not harm the vampires in Twilight. In Dracula however the items either burn the vampires, they just do not go near them. They usually just try to find an alternate solution around the object. This is shown when Draula used the wolf from the zoo to break the window open to get inside to suck on Lucy’s blood
The Victorian England setting and culture of “Dracula” by: Bram Stoker attributes to many stylistic components and character behaviours in the novel. One of which is the behaviour and actions characters express that are a result of sexual repression. In Dracula, sexual repression is best expressed by the character’s desire to create. This desire is exemplified by the way Dracula creates other vampires, Lucy’s sexual desires, and the men’s expression of aggression. The creation of other Vampires is evident through events including Dracula’s aggressive encounters with Lucy and Mina, and the fact the Dracula is building up a Vampire army. Lucy’s sexual desires are exemplified through her longing to have sex with multiple men and how she compares
Through the gothic writing of Stoker, there was a huge intimidation of Dracula coming forth from it. “Stoker spared no effort to present his demonic vampire as dramatically as possible” (Leatherdale 105-17). With this sinister presence of death, people start to panic. As a vampire hunter, it was Helsing’s job to help notify people on how to rid themselves of this demon. Stoker portrays survival in the form of teamwork between the men and women of the novel. These characters soon take survival into their own hands. “‘We must trace each of those boxes; and when we are ready, we must either capture or kill this monster in his lair; or we must, so to speak, sterilize the earth, so that no more he can seek safety in it’” (Stoker 373). At this point in the novel, the characters know about the existence of vampires. The consequences are also put on top priority. The men know of the consequences, yet still want to go after this demon. “By chasing Dracula, the men risk being sentenced to an immortal life as a vampire. This immortality is endless time lived in physical form” (Poquette 35). Knowing the risks of hunting a vampire, the characters ignore them to protect their loved ones. A vampire hunter is an important factor in the novel because without one, the other characters wouldn’t know what to do. Stoker chose right in including
Bram Stoker took the legend of Vlad Tepes and used it as an idea for Dracula. He was the ruler of an old country called Wallachia. He is most famous for impaling his enemies on sticks around his castle. He taught himself how to miss vital organs in the body, causing the victim to die a slow painful death. This is why people consider him an ancient vampire. What people don’t know about him is that the rich loved him, but the poor hated him. To anyone that didn’t have to seal to make it by he was great. But to the poor people who couldn’t buy food, they were always in fear of him. He was abused as a child, and this is what is thought to have caused his behavior. (Melton 1053)
While the character of Renfield is ostensively extraneous to the central plot of Dracula, he fulfils an important role in Stoker’s exploration of the central themes of the novel. This paper will examine how Renfield character is intertwined with the three central themes of invasion, blood and otherness. Firstly, through Renfield’s inner struggle we learn that he is ‘not his own master’ (Stoker, 211). The theme of invasion is revealed by the controlling and occupying powers of Count Dracula. Secondly, the recurring theme ‘the Blood is the Life’ (Stoker, 121), is portrayed throughout the novel and has been interpreted through Stoker’s character Renfield. Then finally, a look at the social construction of the ‘other’ in Dracula and how, through Renfield, who is ‘unlike the normal lunatic’ (Stoker, 52), the Count emerges as the ‘other’ of all ‘others’.
‘Dracula’ is a novel that probes deeply into people’s superstitions, fears and beliefs of the supernatural. The creature Dracula is an evil being with no concern for others, he kills for his own ends and cannot be stopped, and this is what makes ‘Dracula’ truly frightening.
He is an undead centuries-old vampire who sleeps in a coffin in the basement, can assume the form of animals, control the weather and is stronger than twenty men, he cannot come into a house unless invited, he cannot walk in water and his favorite meal is human blood, which these traits are consistent with his portrayal in both the novel and the movie (Stoker). Although the novel and movie share many likenesses with Count Dracula’s character there are some unique qualities that are slightly different the book describes a shadow coordinated with Count Dracula’s body while in the movie his shadow works separately from his body movements (“Dracula (Universal Classics)”). Another feature of Count Dracula’s character in the novel is that he cannot be in or near the sunlight or it will kill him, but in the movie, he meets Mina in the daytime and it does not harm him (Bram Stoker’s). Nevertheless, in the book Dracula is a pure evil, terrifying blood hungry monster that wreaks havoc on anyone he meets and feels the need to take life or end life with his arch nemesis being with anyone who wants to preserve life (Stoker). But in the movie when he meets Mina on the streets of London, he pursues her, starts a courtship with Mina and he falls in love with her so when he
Count Dracula has been the frontrunner for the modern day vampire lore and legends since being printed back in 1897, pop culture took the vampire traits from Bram Stoker’s Dracula and twisted them. In modern portrayals of vampire lore, each author chooses an original aspect from Stoker but then creates a little bit of their own lore in the process. Count Dracula appears to be a walking corpse from the pale and gaunt visual aesthetics to the coolness of his undead skin (Stoker). In some cultures, the vampire is able to transform from the body of a human being to that of a fellow creature of the night, a bat. In the novel Dracula more than one town was easily visualized through the detailed descriptions throughout the novel, thus
Dracula represents fear and a sort of curiosity but he also creates a nausea as explained by Jonathan Harker. "As the Count leaned over me and his hands touched me a horrible feeling of nausea came over me, which, do what I would, I could not conceal."(Chapter 2, pg. 20) Count Dracula managed to surprise you with something new or some sort of new power he has. Unlike the rest of the characters, Dracula stands out because he is evil and he does not have a heart surely because he is undead as Van Helsing explains. But what does Dracula really represent? In the novel " Dracula" by Bram Stoker, Dracula represents the main fear of the rest of the additional sums me of the characters and the trauma of Jonathan Harker
In Bram Stoker's "Dracula", Dracula is portrayed as a monster made evident by his gruesome actions. An analysis of Dracula shows that: shows his evil nature in his planning, brutally killing Lucy Westrenstra causing a violent response from Dr. Seward and others, and how his evil ways lead to his downfall. To characterize Dracula in one way, he is a ruthless, cunning monster who uses tricks, torture, and wits to manipulate people to his will. However when he trifled with some courageous people, he had no knowledge that it would be his undoing.