Resolved: The XXII Amendment of the U.S. Constitution should be repealed. “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” (U.S. Constitution Preamble) Case Structure: 1) “We the People” This Democratic Republic was established “of the people, by the people, for the people.”(1) At the time this was established, it was a radical change from the governments that preceded it. We the people of the U.S. are to have a voice. We are to be able to elect our own representatives. …show more content…
Our Congress and our president are subject to our approval via voting. Contrary to the tyrannical governments of history, the United States, we “the people,” are intended to have the sovereignty and power to govern ourselves. 2) The function and impact of the XXII amendment Imagine yourself a hiring manager and you are looking for an employee.
In front of you a stack of resumes’. Are you going to look through and remove from consideration any and all candidates that have experience? Of course not!? If anything, experience is a positive impact on who may be chosen. Before even allowing the American people to exercise their sovereignty and consider who the best person for the office may be, the XXII Amendment of the United States Constitution does just that. It removes from consideration those with the most experience. This is not only foolish, but harmful. This amendment sets term limits to the office of the president. Setting a term limit mitigates the natural function of elections. The people should have the power to determine if a politician has served enough terms as President. If the people feel this is the case. They could simple vote that politician out of office. Thus the impact of this amendment is to limit the sovereignty and choice of the people. This is in direct conflict with our founding principles. I contend that the people should retain the sovereignty to decide when a politician is not suitable for the office of President through voting. To undermine this freedom and sovereignty of the people is to allow
tyranny. 3) Repeal The repeal of the XXII amendment would keep experienced candidates in consideration, allow our Democratic Republic to function as intended via elections, and allow Americans to retain freedom and sovereignty. Therefore, the XXII Amendment should be repealed.
The Tenth Amendment was ratified along with the rest of the Bill of Rights on December 17th, 1791, as well, unlike most other amendments, it gave rights not only to the people, but also to the state governments. The Tenth Amendment was passed in order to delegate powers to the state governments and the people that the national government does not have, this amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”
Government exists to serve the people, and not the politicians, American citizens know this. Polls show that Americans want term limitation by margins as high as three-to-one, even four-to-one. Congressional term limitation is the most important issue of our time because the future direction of our country depends upon it. There is no other way to restore government to, us, the people. There is no substitute for term limits. There are many second steps, depending upon where you sit, but there is only one first step toward turning the country around. It is con...
Congress should pass an amendment that requires a staggered 18-year term limit on the tenure of Supreme Court justices. Under this proposal, each justice would serve for 18 years, and the terms would be established so that there is a vacancy every two years. The vacancies would be on the first and third years of the presidential term. This would allow enough time so the senate would pass this nomination through and the president would not be denied one of his two appointees. The
The eighteenth amendment states that alcoholic beverages in the United States was prohibited. They did this by making production, transport, and sale of alcohol illegal. This amendment basically states that alcohol is illegal. I am against this amendment for a few reason such as manufacturing different, stronger stuff to bend the law.
In his article " Term limits for Congress: Would amending the Constitution 'drain the swamp'?", published on The Christian Science Monitor web page, Steven Porter describes the idea of proposition of constitutional amendment concerning term limits of the U.S. Congress members. According to this proposition, the new term limits should be reduced to three two-year terms and two six-year terms for House of Representative and Senate members respectingly. The author argues, that even though there are a lot of barriers for the amendment to become a law, supporters of this measure believe that the nation is willing to get these changes done. S. Porter supports his idea by considering opinions and arguments of both sides, those supporting the ratification
Upon the opening words of the Constitution, "We the People do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America," one must ask, who are these people? While the American Constitution provided its citizens with individual rights, many members were excluded. Elite framers manipulated the idea of a constitution in order to protect their economic interests and the interests of their fellow white land and slave owning men' by restricting the voices of women, slaves, indentured servants and others. Therefore, the Constitution cannot truly be considered a "democratic document." However, because it is a live document, malleable and controllably changeable according to the interest of congress, it has enabled us to make reforms overtime. Such reforms that have greatly impacted America, making us the free, independent nation that we are today.
Throughout history, Term limits have been a very controversial issue as well as a powerful reform regarding politics. Term limits can best be defined as a restriction or a limit to a number of times an official may be elected or serve. For years, American politics have been dealing with the movement to limit political terms. Though there are some who disapprove of term limits for Congressmen, there are many Americans who have approved. There is widespread support on Term Limits, which shows us that the public is dissatisfied with what is occurring in Congress presently. In many states, cities and counties across the United States term limits have been established for state and local officials. Congress is currently running on a system of seniority. Individuals who have spent the most time in office gain more power. As a result, these Congressmen focus on how they can stay in office and that plan leaves limited room for fresh new officials to have a chance to make changes. Term limits should be placed on our Congressmen and women because it would allow for a more efficient Congress.
On September 17, 1787, 39 delegates from the thirteen colonies elegantly signed their names on the United States Constitution. Even as the signers read and marveled over their written documentation of our new government, they realized problems could still emerge in the Constitution that would need to be addressed. To solve this dilemma, the delegates came up with a way that the Constitution could be changed so that future generations could patch up any holes they found in this important document. These changes are called Amendments, and today there are a total of 27 of them. Each Amendment is crucial to our Constitution, but which one is the most important? It’s strongly believed that compared to the other 26 corrections, the first Amendment is the most essential to our country’s Constitution because only the first Amendment protects our rights to religious worship and to oppose what we think doesn’t belong in the government.
The United States of America is a republic, or representative democracy. Democracy, a word that comes to us from Greek, literally means the people rule (Romance, July 8). This broad definition leaves unanswered a few important details such as who are the people, how shall they rule, and what should they rule on (July 8). Defining the answers to those questions means defining a model for a democratic system. William E. Hudson defines four such models in his book American Democracy in Peril: the Protective, Developmental, Pluralist, and Participatory models of democracy (Hudson, 8-19). Of these models, perhaps Participatory comes closest to an ideal, pure democracy of rule by the people (16-19). In practice, however, establishing a stable ideal democracy is not entirely feasible. In a country the size of the United States, it quickly becomes unwieldy if not impossible to have direct rule by the people. To overcome this, the compromise of the representative system allows the people to choose who will rule on a regular basis. The political culture that defines American politics shows that despite this compromise, America is still very much a democratic society.
The Living Constitution is the best solution to the country's problems and democracy. The living constitution allows the federal judges to be able to incorporate new laws into modern situations. Allowing the constitution to become flexible rather than trying to adapt current situations into laws that were made for the old world. Justice Breyer says “We require a constitution that works well for the people today.” If the constitution was able to fix all the current problems then this topic would not have come up. The constitution is specific to the Framers and their problems. Also as Justice Marshall states, “To change the rules in the future, because it is unwise to not change the constitution when you need it most.” This statement is wise
But the government’s heart can be sapped by incumbents. This threat shows that the Framers failed to create a necessary check on the legislative branch to prevent incumbents from manipulating the districts of voters for self-gain. Hence, my amendment is necessary to protect the government’s democracy-heart. If politicians choose their voters rather than the other way around, is the United States still a democracy at all? Or is it simply a governmental tin man with no
When the twenty-second amendment was ratified February 27, 1951 Congress limited the office of the president to two terms of four years each. During the debate Congress made no attempt to address term limits for Congress. According to the United State Senate website as of January 9, 2018 the longest running senator was Democrat representing West Virginia Robert C. Byrd length of service was fifty-one years, five months, and twenty-six days. (US Senate 2018). When the Constitution of the United States was adopted in 1789, at the time professional politicians were unheard of, and the idea of someone serving for more than one or two terms was unlikely. My proposed amendment is for congress term limits of two terms for Senators and three terms for House of
The amendments are a set of rights assured to every American as part of the freedom our country promises. The amendment that will be the focal point of this paper, the second, was ratified in 1791. It states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Our country was a completely different place during those times, which is the reason I believe the Bill of Rights should be rewritten, and updated every so often. By updated, I do not mean anything taken away or added to it, but for the way it was written to be altered. If it was more easily understandable there would be no leeway for people to get away with limiting these rights of our people.
The original U.S. constitution was established with the intention to create a whole national government and protect the natural and legal rights of the citizens of the United States. Ratified in 1791, the first seven amendments (in addition to the ten amendments of the Bill of Rights) of the Constitution broadly summarizes an American’s rights as well as the powers of the federal and state systems. With the Constitution, every American citizen is entitled to equality… at least the ones who are seen as citizens. Unfortunately, the original U.S. constitution shouldn’t be considered a “democratic” document due to this exact reason. The phrase “We The People” was only permitted to those who, in the eyes of the founding fathers, met the qualifications
The United States has one of the best Constitutions that the world has seen, it has lasted through the years, through many different situations and it still survives to this day. One of the main benefits of our Constitution is that it is flexible, if our government finds it necessary, they can change and ratify the document to better govern our country. While many of our amendments have gone through change throughout the years, there is one that still needs to be changed. The 22nd amendment of the United States was ratified to combat anyone in the position as President from staying in office too long, thus giving them more power than they should have. While this was a good policy to enact it only enforced term limits on the President, not any of the other branches of government, even though these