Wrongful Accusations Do Not Necessarily Lead to Wrongful Conviction

Wrongful Convictions
Introduction
There is no true way to know the amount of individuals who have been wrongfully convicted (Neubauer, 2011). Contrary to popular belief, justice and law are not coexisting (Gershman, 1993, pp. 502-515). Most individuals feel and believe that the Criminal Justice System would have steps in place to catch and rectify this issue (Neubauer, 2011). The advent of DNA testing not only generated more attention for, and research about wrongful convictions (Gould, 2010, pp. 825-868). This also pushed for academicians from simply research to a hybrid of research and advocacy’s (Gould, 2010, pp. 825-868). Virtually no one denies the existence of wrongful convictions (Gould, 2010, pp. 825-868). Wrongful convictions challenge the integrity and legitimacy of criminal justice and call out for solutions (Davis, 2007). It acts a policy change catalyst wrongful convictions are a research field that touches upon many disciplines (Davis, 2007). The pretrial processing of criminal defendant is extremely important because most criminal cases are resolved before trial (Stolzenberg, 2012).
Body
Advocacy for innocent
Innocent networks are a recent phenomenon within the Criminal Justice System (Siegel, 2012). Their main purpose is to assist in the exoneration of those individuals who have been wrongly convicted (Siegel, 2012). Collectively, as an Innocent Network, they screen claims of innocence, work to exonerate the factually innocent, promote policies to reduce errors of justice, and provide support for exonerees (Siegel, 2012). A vast majority of these exonerations are for murder and rape cases (Siegel, 2012). And a majority has been successful through the use of DNA evidence (Siegel, 2012). The pressures to produce conv...

... middle of paper ...

...tandard for the Prosecutor's Exercise of the Charging Discretion. Fordham Urban Law Journal , 20, 513-530.
Gould, J., & Leo, R. (2010). One Hundred Years Later: Wrongful Convictions After A Century of Research. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 100(3), 825-868.
Leipold, A. (2005). How the Pretrial Process Contributes to Wrongful Convictions. American Criminal Law Revew, 42, 1123-1165.
Neubauer, D., & Fradella, H. (2011). America's Court And The Criminal Justice System (11 ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
Siegel, L., & Worrall, J. (2012). Introduction to Criminal Justice (14th ed.). Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
Stolzenberg, L., & D'Alessio, S. (2012). Criminal Courts for the 21st Century (3rd ed.). Lexington, KY: Weston.
Zalman, M., Larson, M., & Smith, B. (2012). Citizen's Attitudes Towards Wrongful Convictions. Criminal Justice Review, 37, 51-69.