Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial disparity in criminal justice
Racial disparity in criminal justice
Racial discrimination in the US justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial disparity in criminal justice
“Cherish your freedom, don’t take it for granted, and enjoy every day you’ve got,” Rafael Madrigal, an exoneree who spent nine years in prison for an attempted murder he did not commit, once said upon his release. Although Madrigal did not express public hatred or anger after being released from prison, the time taken from his life still haunts him nine years later. Madrigal’s case further justifies the argument that wrongful conviction can happen to anyone, and affect anyone’s life. With the belief that our law system is so perfect and structured, it is sometimes hard to believe cases such as Madrigal’s. By irrational standards, we have been taught that our law system here in …show more content…
America is fair and ideal as is. The truth; our law system is much more harmful and prejudiced than revealed to the public eye. Possibly the most significant deficiency within the system, wrongful convictions are a result of various issues within jurors, prosecutors, and the system as a whole. What's worse, wrongful convictions are often overlooked in news and media portrayal. The cases we see in the media are sugar coated and elaborated to the point where they are simply “good news stories.” This means they are solely for entertainment purposes and are not completely truthful. Furthermore, wrongful convictions are much more common than observed by the public. An article by Huffington Post approximated the values, “There's no clear data on how many innocent people have been wrongfully convicted. The Innocence Project, citing multiple studies, estimates from 2 percent to 5 percent of prisoners are actually innocent. The U.S., which leads the world in incarceration of its citizens, has approximately 2 million people behind bars.” In other words, America has a great number of innocent people behind bars, yet little reform is being made on this grievance. Another article by Newsweek stated that “Since 1973, 144 people on death row have been exonerated.” Wrongfully convicted persons not only lose their lives figuratively, but are threatened by the chance of literally being sentenced to death. With such dangerous and severe punishments implemented in our system, now is the time to change these horrifying statistics. Previously, I had known about wrongful convictions, but never looked into them at all; when I stumbled across an article sharing the traumatic story of Kalief Browder, my interest in the subject was piqued and I wanted to learn more about this injustice.
Kalief Browder was a sixteen year old boy who was wrongfully accused of stealing a backpack. He spent three years in solitary confinement on Rikers Island before committing suicide in 2015. Kalief’s story truly upset me, and I wanted to learn why this had happened, and what I could possibly do to ensure this never happens again in the future. My first interests within wrongful conviction were racial bias, reform, and reparation. Questions formed in my mind such as: Why is there not better training towards prosecutors? How common are wrongful convictions? What is being done to combat this grievance? How are exonerees given the resources, if any, to restart their lives? And more specifically, what type of apology, if any, is made? I found it sickening that our law system is not doing anything substantial to shut down this issue. Therefore, I decided to pick wrongful conviction as my topic, and began my research. I read many articles, magazines, and a book about wrongful conviction. Also, I interviewed Colin Bowen, a criminal defense attorney in Oakland, California, and Rhonda Donato, a former attorney for the Innocence Project in Northern California. Despite a few nuances, such as Donato having to postpone our interview, both characters had much to say and much information about wrongful conviction. Through this project, I hope to share with the class the heartbreaking truth behind wrongful convictions, and inspire them to help make a difference. Wrongful convictions are brought about by many many different flaws in our criminal justice system, primarily erroneous eyewitness testimony, and racial stereotyping and systemic bias in the law enforcement
community. A common cause of wrongful conviction is eyewitness testimony, which is so often incorrect or falsely altered that it has become an insufficient form of evidence in many cases. As criminal defense attorney Colin Bowen stated, “On the one hand, [causes of wrongful conviction] can range from poor eyewitness identification or poor collection of evidence. Eyewitness identification, if you read the literature, it’s probably some of the most scary types of cases because people are not lying. They believe that that’s the person, that they’re wrong” (Bowen Interview). Many people, out of fear, subconsciousness, or anger do not tell the complete truth in court. However, as Bowen explained, many people believe their accusations are truthful because of how quick their interactions with the defendant were. Sometimes the interactions can be less than a minute long, which proves that trusting eyewitness identification without any other evidence is a terrible mistake our lawyers, attorneys, judges, and judicial committees need to be aware of. “Findings from basic psychological research and neuroscience studies indicate that memory is a reconstructive process that is susceptible to distortion. In the courtroom, even minor memory distortions can have severe consequences that are in part driven by common misunderstandings about memory” (US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Article). Memory alone is much too insufficient to charge someone with a crime without supporting evidence; memory almost inevitably leads to error. One example of this inaccuracy is the case of Julius Earl Ruffin, “Julius Earl Ruffin knows all too well how inaccurate eyewitness identification can be. On May 3, 1982, in a Norfolk, Va. circuit court, the 29-year-old was convicted of a rape that he did not commit and was sentenced to five life sentences. The case rested solely on the testimony of the victim, Ann Meng, a young mother of three who confidently pointed to Ruffin as her assailant. Twenty-one years would pass before Ruffin was able to prove his innocence with DNA evidence” (ABC News Article). This case proves how one statement from an eyewitness can drastically change someone's life forever. Besides a specific intention to have someone put behind bars, many citizens truly think they have the right person, but the encounter was so quick they really had no way of telling. As far as specific reasons behind false eyewitness testimony confessions, many people will lie out of fear for themselves or loved ones, out of anger, or wanting to get revenge, and personal bias they have with the defendant. One of the reasons eyewitness testimony is unreliable is racial bias, which may affect jurors judgment in ways they are not even aware. Eyewitness testimony is only one example of racial stereotyping in our legal structure. Some of the problem and explanation of wrongful convictions has to do with the racist heritage that has been so pervasive in our society for hundreds of years.The statistics speak for themselves, “African Americans are only 13% of the American population but a majority of innocent defendants wrongfully convicted of crimes and later exonerated. They constitute 47% of the 1,900 exonerations listed in the National Registry of Exonerations (as of October 2016), and the great majority of more than 1,800 additional innocent defendants who were framed and convicted of crimes in 15 large-scale police scandals” (Samuel R. Gross of Umich Law Article). Even though African Americans are arguably the largest minority group in America, they become the vast majority when it comes to issues of wrongful conviction cases. Upon reading the words of Samuel R. Gross, I could not help but wonder what the reasons behind this racial bias are. I found that “the explanations for these racial disparities range from deliberate racial stereotyping — such as the perception of jurors and law enforcement that African-Americans are more ‘prone to violence’ — to unconscious racism. For example, witnesses are far more likely to misidentify perpetrators of different races from their own, even if they hold no conscious racial prejudices” (American Civil Liberties Union Article). Here we see how racial bias can be present throughout many different professionals in the criminal justice system, ranging from “jurors and law enforcement” to “witnesses.” An article by the American Civil Liberties Union further broadens this issue: “As the brief recounts, African-American defendants are more likely to be wrongfully convicted of crimes punishable by death. . . The majority of nationwide death row exonerations are all also disproportionately people of color.” Almost half of the 1,900 exonerates mentioned in the article from 2016 were African American. These statistics prove that race plays a huge role in wrongful conviction, and in our criminal justice system as a whole. We need better training so professionals working in our law system are completely fair minded towards all defendants, regardless of their background or color of their skin. Besides racial bias, there are other forms of bias present in our criminal justice system. To end wrongful convictions for good, we must all get involved. Everyone can do their part, whether this means staging a protest, or simply donating to the Innocence Project or similar organizations. Donato voiced her opinions on how we can get more people involved in preventing this injustice: “I think the best way to educate people about it is just hearing exonerates stories, which is much more powerful than having them go to some forum, or watch a documentary, or a news show. I think that is one of the best ways. You know, to hear: he was sixteen. He was going to be going to USC on a college scholarship, and got convicted wrongfully of rape. When you hear his story, it's really powerful. I mean, I think that's what makes people want to make the change” (Donato Interview). As Donato stated, we need to educate those around us on this issue. We need to make people sympathize and relate to the victims of wrongful conviction. This is the best way we can educate people on this grievance. Together, we can stop this injustice. Unfortunately, various issues in our law system influence wrongful convictions, varying from issues of race, to eyewitness testimony, and finally to systemic bias. As we have seen, there are many different factors within these topics that further influence this injustice. Our criminal justice system favors many social groups, predominantly white, wealthy males over the minorities, significantly poorer African American, and Latino members of the community. Currently, innocent people’s lives are being taken away from them as a result of injustice in our legal system. The victims of wrongful conviction have no warning, no time to prepare. They are taken from their homes, taken from their loved ones, taken from their friends and essentially taken from the lives they happily lived, and the next victim could be anybody! We have to be the generation to make change. We have to put ourselves into the shoes of someone who has been wrongfully convicted. Imagine having your whole life taken from you on the account of something you did not do. Wrongful convictions challenge the ideals of equality and justice for all that our legal system in America is known for. The incorporation of Innocence reform into the legal system will only benefit those working in the system, as well as those affected by the injustices of our current system.
In the article titled ”Man Denied Parole in a Flagstaff Hotel” the article follows the case of then teenager Jacob Wideman murdering his bunkmate Eric Kane while he slept in his bed at a summer camp hotel in Flagstaff, Arizona in 1986. Jacob was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 25 years, the article was written in 2011the year of his first parole hearing. The issue for the readers to decipher in the article is if they believe Jacob who has served the past 25 years in prison should be granted parole and be released from prison. The article gives up to date insight from the parents of both of boys, Jacob who committed the murder, and Eric the victim all leading up to Jacob’s parole hearing. In this paper I will highlight key points from the article while answering key questions to give a better understanding of the trial for myself and for the readers.
In July of 2008, one of the biggest crime cases devastated the United States nation-wide. The death of Caylee Anthony, a two year old baby, became the most popular topic in a brief amount of time. Caylee’s mother, Casey Anthony, became the main suspect after the child supposedly was kidnapped and went missing. To this day, the Casey Anthony case shocks me because justice, in my opinion, wasn’t served. I feel as if the criminal conviction system became somewhat corrupted in this case. The entire nation, including the court system, knew that Casey Anthony was behind this criminal act, but yet she escaped all charges. I chose this case not only because it’s debatable, but also to help state the obvious, this case was handled the wrong way. Clearly the legal system was biased, which worked in Casey Anthony’s favor, freeing a murderer.
If that does not occur to the reader as an issue than factoring in the main problem of the topic where innocent people die because of false accusation will. In addition, this book review will include a brief review of the qualifications of the authors, overview of the subject and the quality of the book, and as well as my own personal thoughts on the book. In the novel Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right authors Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer expose the flaws of the criminal justice system through case histories where innocent men were put behind bars and even on death row because of the miscarriages of justice. Initially, the text promotes and galvanizes progressive change in the legal
Roberts, J. V., & Grossman, M. G. (2012). Why Say Sorry When I Didn't Do It? Remorse and the Dilemma of the Wrongfully Convicted. Criminal Justice in Canada: A Reader Fourth Edition. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson Education Ltd
The 6th amendement of the U.S. Constituion gurantees the acussed the right to a speedy trial. In New York more specifically, the prosecution must be ready for trial on all felonies except murder within six months, or the charges aginst a defendant can be dissmissed. However, an article written in The New Yorker by Jennifer Gonnerman about a young man named Kalief Browder, sheds light on a situation that is should have been handled more differently. Kalief browder spend three years on Rikers Island in what could only be described as horrible conditions, and suffered appalling violence, without ever being convicted of a crime. The failure of our Criminal Justice System not only deprived Kalief Browder the right to a speedy trial, but also robbed such a young man of an education, and most importantly his freedom. - Thesis Statement .
The United States has a larger percent of its population incarcerated than any other country. America is responsible for a quarter of the world’s inmates, and its incarceration rate is growing exponentially. The expense generated by these overcrowded prisons cost the country a substantial amount of money every year. While people are incarcerated for a number of reasons, the country’s prisons are focused on punishment rather than reform, and the result is a misguided system that fails to rehabilitate criminals or discourage crime. The ineffectiveness of the United States’ criminal justice system is caused by mass incarceration of non-violent offenders, racial profiling, and a high rate of recidivism.
Civilrights.org. (2002, April 13). Justice on trial. Washington, DC: Leadership Conference on Civil Rights/Leadership Conference on Civil RightsEducation Fund. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from Civilrights.org Web site: http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/cj/
Convicts rarely serve their entire sentences in prison (Ross and Richards, 146). To alleviate the costs of imprisonment on taxpayers and lessen the staggering populations of prisons across America, it is simply prudent to let inmates out on parole. Unfortunately, the parole system is imperfect and often leads to many ex-convicts recidivating. With the various trials and challenges that ex-convicts are bound to face when rejoining society after prison, Ross and Richards provide valuable lessons in their book of how a convict might survive beyond bars.
Many things contribute to the corruption of our justice system. Within the past five years, through police brutality the United States has shown how tainted it really is. In Just Mercy, Bryan Stevenson argues that because of family history, misunderstanding youth, and background, our justice system is defined by error. His many points and examples give exceptional proof to his findings. While the government has made some changes over the years for the justice system subjects such as the incarceration of minors and police and laws within the system still need adjusting.
The aspect of wrongful conviction is established within law to protect the innocent from being abused by the law. Nevertheless, the real issue of concern is the fact of whether wrongful conviction actually helps those who cannot help themselves. With that said, another important underlying factor is whether the criminal justice system has restrictions set up to help those from being innocently convicted and those who have been convicted and later was found to be innocent. By looking at the case of Guy Paul Morin, one will see how the police, courts, and criminal justice system failed in aiding the innocent and bringing justice in society, as well as showing that the system has failed in helping its people, and what must be done to aid those who have been wrongfully convicted.
The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).
The statement "It is better that 10 guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer" summarises and highlights the mistakes and injustices in the criminal justice system. In a just society, the innocent would never be charged, nor convicted, and the guilty would always be caught and punished. Unfortunately, it seems this would be impossible to achieve due to the society in which we live. Therefore, miscarriages of justice occur in the criminal justice system more frequently than is publicised or known to the public at large. They are routine and would have to be considered as a serious problem in our society. The law is what most people respect and abide by, if society cannot trust the law that governs them, then there will be serious consequences including the possible breakdown of that society. In order to have a fair and just society, miscarriages of justice must not only become exceptional but ideally cease to occur altogether.
The United States has historically promoted the rights of man and liberty. The sentencing of an innocent person not only displays the inefficiency of a government’s judicial system to uphold these values, but also the irreversible damage done to the individual.
My interests in government and law first arose in grade 10 of high school when I took both civics and law classes. Here is where I first learned about the importance of the constitution, charter and the government’s role in the criminal justice system. This is also where I first learned about government policy and the importance of accountability and oversight in the criminal justice system. I immediately became captivated by these classes and knew that I wanted to do something in this field. My experiences in the Criminal Justice and Public Policy (CJPP) undergraduate degree have led me to become passionate about several criminal justice issues such as corrections, penology, victimology and public policy. One specific area of interest that I have found incredibly captivating is the accountability and oversight of the courts, judiciary, police and the media when reporting on criminal justice issues. Over the four years in my program, I have had the opportunity to learn about an immense number of criminal justice issues and methodologies that have created a desire to continue learning and practicing in the criminal justice field. As the CJPP program can be very demanding, it has allowed me to develop my problem-solving, communication, organizational, and time management skills.
Neubauer, D. W., & Fradella, H. F. (2014). America's courts and the criminal justice system (Eleventh ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.