Write A Rhetorical Analysis On Homeopathy

420 Words1 Page

The thesis of my essay is homeopathy brain washes healthy people with its inconsistent evidences of effectiveness, regardless today’s scientific method.

This article starts with author’s own experience that her sore throat and fever were cured by “snake venom”. It is so dramatic that causing her to believe homeopathy was effective, and raises her passion to support it. It is true that people would be amazed by some “miracles” with unexplained functionalities that affect them. However, individual should not “trust” one “miracle” which only happened once. The author herself only experienced the good stuff from homeopathy once, as her state, then conclude that it is an effective way. Base on the method we use today to prove a medical treatment, we need to do experiments; we should make sure that the object is testable by hypothesis deductive method. The author didn’t do this, she just bluntly accepted the miracle without scientific trustworthy proofs, so how should she convince the reader scientifically it is trustworthy at the first place? …show more content…

She also states that every individual’s physique is different in functionality, because something that causes her sore throat may not work on other ones. This is her point of view’s inconsistency. A theory is scientific, by definition, it should explains by and large the known facts of its domain and is testable. However, she thinks because homeopathy treats same symptom differently for each individual, it cannot be tested. The only information source she got was from testimony. The tiny dilution theory was not observed in human body. This idea that makes her supports homeopathy is not convincing to the scientific

Open Document