Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Opposing child labor during the industrial revolution
Opposing child labor during the industrial revolution
Child labor laws in the 1800s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Working Conditions of Children Factories/ Mills inspected : Cotton Mill, Cromford Date : 8th of October of the year 1844 I visited the cotton mill in Cromford Because, whilst there are advantages to employing children, for example: requiring far less pay compared to adults, and apprentices not even needing pay! We understand that also they are useful in the fact that they are far more agile therefore being able to crawl under machinery easily so then they can fix broken threads. I was concerned to hear of disturbing cases of: * Cramped and dank/ dark working conditions with an awful stench * Impossibly long hours * Ill treatment, i.e. beatings etc * Poor protection from machinery * Deformation due to your work I talked to: Robert Blincoe, apprentice from the age of 7. Elizabeth Bentley, 23, change the flyers on the frame when full etc. Joseph Hebergam, 17. Each worker provided me with important evidence for my report, for example: * Robert Blincoe had to work in smelly, noisy conditions, with dust and flue suffocating him. He had to constantly stoop to do his task and was forbidden from a quick break and was made to work for 6 and a half hours without rest. He became so deformed because of his work he has had to leave work. * Elizabeth Bentley was expected to be constantly on her feet and had to run about in order to change the frames. If she slowed for a minute to catch her breath then they would be strapped, their parents were to scared to do anything about this for the fear of losing their jobs. Where Elizabeth was made to work she injured herself and has now become deformed. * Joseph Hebergam had worked for but half a year and then he could
Imagine being forced to work in conditions that might cause you to lose a limb, to be beaten daily, or to be left with long term respiratory conditions. These terrible conditions were realities to families who worked in textile factories in the 1700’s. England was the first to adopt textile factories which would benefit with mass production of cotton material. According to the power point, “Industrial Revolution; Life in English Factories”, low and unskilled workers, often children, ran the machines and moved material, this helped lower the cost of goods. During this time, commissions investigated the working conditions of the factories.
Overall, this source is useful as it does provide us with some information on the horrific conditions which may have been present at some mills, however it is does not represent the overall conditions for apprentices at mills, so it could be seen as unreliable. In summary, it is clear that none of the sources are invaluable to us, as they all provide us with some facts or opinions, and help us to understand the different views on child labour and working conditions at mills during the time. However, like all sources, they all hold drawbacks as well, and none of them are completely consistent to us.
Many businesses and factories hired children because they were easier to exploit; they could be paid less for more work in dangerous conditions. Plus, their small size made many children idea for working with small parts or fitting into small spaces. Children as young as four could be found working in factories, though most were between eight and twelve. Despite the economic gains made by the business that employed them, many children suffered in the workplace. The industrial setting caused many health problems for the children that, if they lived long enough, they would carry with them for the rest of their lives. Children were also more likely to face accidents in the workplace, often caused by fatigue, and many were seriously injured or killed. Despite efforts by reformers to regulate child labor, it wasn’t until the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 that children under 14 were prohibited from
Working Conditions of Children in Textile Mills After thorough investigation into 5 sources referring to the working conditions for children in factories during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, we now have the opportunity to bind all the facts together and create a detailed account. However, there are still questions over the reliability of some of the sources, so further research and comparisons with other mills need to be made. Making comparisons will also indicate the typicality of Styal. Hopefully, by the end of this essay I will be able to prioritise the best way of finding out about the treatment of children in textile mills.
At the beginning of the 1800’s most laborers worked at home. The family functioned together as a working unit for the common good of all its members. Children would stay at home to help until they got married. They usually did not become contributing members until they reached the age of ten. Girls started somewhat earlier because they would be assisting their mothers with the domestic economy(Gaskell, 91).
The cotton industry brought unprecedented growth to many towns and cities in the Lancashire area. The economic prosperity of the cotton industry laid heavily on the shoulders of the many children who worked in the mills, often to their detriment. Eventually a small group of people fought for the well being of child labourers and a number of labour laws were passed which aimed removed children from factories all together.
Throughout history, children have always worked, either as apprentices or servants. However, child labor reached a whole new scale during the time period of the Industrial Revolution. Throughout the time frame of late 1800s-early 1900s, children worked long hours in dangerous factory conditions for very little wages. They were considered useful as laborers because their small stature allowed them to be cramped into smaller spaces, and they could be paid less for their services. Many worked to help support their families, and by doing so, they forwent their education. Numerous nineteenth century reformers and labor groups sought to restrict child labor and to improve working conditions.
Within months of the arrival of the early settlers on American soil, they were faced with the bitter cold of winter. These settlers were unprepared for winter. They were still in the process of building their houses, they had not gathered enough food to survive through the season, and they had no means of keeping warm during these dangerous months. Many of the early settlers died during these harsh cold months. With so many dead the use of child labor was necessary to survive for the colonist. In American history, this is often the case. In extreme times, when parents are unable to provide for their children on their own, the use of child labor is often
I believe that old English textile mills were a hazardous environment for children and anyone who worked in them but especially to the children who worked there. If I were a parent I would not have let my child work in one of these mills. My first piece of evidence would be that in these four documents A and C and in document B and D said that the masters of these mills were abusive and beat the children until they bled or broke bones. The children were in the most trouble because they had to work with machines that were two maybe even three times their size and they could have even lost limbs.
Child labor is the employment of children, but not all work done by children should be classified as child labor that should be eliminated. Children’s participation in work that does not affect their health and personal development or interfere with their schooling is generally regarded as being something positive. The term “child labor” is defined as work that deprives children of their childhood, interferes with their ability to attend regular school, and that is mentally, physically, socially or morally dangerous and harmful.
Child labor refers to the employment of children in any work that deprives them from enjoying and living their childhood properly, it also intervenes in the process of attending school regularly. It creates a mental, physical, social and moral impact on the child.
For example, factory workers were expected to work 14-16 hour days, six days a week. The dusty, dirty, unlit mills along with few break times made working there a living hell. “Breaker boys suffered from chronic throat trouble and respiratory illnesses that were caused by inhaling coal dust. Above ground machinery, particularly coal crushers, were dangerously loud. If a breaker boy worked long hours around the coal crusher he often suffered from hearing loss (Wagner). Due to the fact that there were no safety laws in place, ear plugs and masks were not used. In fact, no safety equipment was. The dangerous machines with unprotected parts made children susceptible to injury and death. If someone were to get injured, they were immediately fired and not paid compensation for their health care. “If a boy was caught wearing gloves, the boss would beat him. A skin condition that miners termed “Red tips” was brought about by prolonged contact with sulfur from the coal. Breaker boys’ fingers often became cracked, bloody, and swollen from sorting (Wagner)....
For the purpose of this essay, Britain will be concentrated on to discover the historical approach to child labour along with compulsory schooling, plus the effects this had on the lives of children and their families. The last two hundred years from the 1800’s to 2000 are explored to recognize the issues surrounding prolonging childhood in mainly Britain. It was here child labour was initially recognised in factories, mills and mines in the early nineteenth century. This essay will demonstrate the various changes during this period, and the differences between the working class and upper class childhoods and the differences between the childhoods of two hundred years ago, and that of today. As a result, this essay will describe the changes in the experiences and opinions of childhood to the prolonging of childhood in Britain.
Child laboring is defined as work of child under 18 age, which effects on their physical, mental and social development. According to ILO (International Labour Organization), child laboring is working of children in their early age because of psychological and social pressure (ILO,1992). Education is the basic right of the human being. Early age working interferes with education which effects on mental development of children. Child laboring also interferes social and moral life of child.
Do you think child labor is a problem? Many people think it is not a problem in the United states. Child labor and sweatshops are still a big problem all around the world because they are still around and some sweatshops abuse the children and don’t pay them enough.