Woodcock- Johnson III NU: Tests of Cognitive Abilities

840 Words2 Pages

After reading and reviewing the data sets, the U.S. Bureau of the Census thus reported changed in the population that were then reflected in a newly and revised set of normative statistics. Included in this normative update were revised geographical shifts, greater percentages for a population of children, a greater minority population, and an increase in urbanization. All of these changes then provided researchers to evaluate the test due to overall population changes. The changes were recorded into the 2005 census data and reflected in the Compuscore Normative Update, the Profiles Program, and the Technical Manual for the Woodcock-Johnson III: Tests if Cognitive Abilities. Reported as the center of technical revisions, the norming and standardization were reported from the procedures of the Woodcock-Johnson III NU: Tests of cognitive Abilities. The data for Woodcock-Johnson III norms and the data was collected from a large sample of 8,818 subjects nationally.
Uses, Value, Strengths and Weaknesses, and Professional Commentary in Literature
Along with the already clear and precise guidelines for the Woodcock-Johnson III NU Tests of Cognitive Abilities, seven new features have been added to the tests. In the Woodcock-Johnson III NU Tests of Cognitive Abilities, it includes eight new tests, which measure information-processing abilities. These tests include ones which measure working memory, planning, naming speed, and attention. Also included in this version are five new cognitive clusters. Of these five clusters, there are also two additional clusters that are available when cognitive and achievement batteries are used together. Included in the tests that is helpful are interception plans and modified organization;...

... middle of paper ...

...abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 721-738.
Jones, W. P., Loe, S. A., Krach, S. K., Rager, R. Y., & Jones, H. M. (2008). Automated Neu ropsychological Assessment Metrics (Anam) and Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cogni tive Ability: A Concurrent Validity Study. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22(2), 305-320. doi: 10.1080/13854040701281483.
Keith, T. Z., Kranzler, J. H., & Flanagan, D. P. (2001). What Does the Cognitive Assessment System (CAS) Measure? Joint Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the CAS and the Wood cock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability (3rd Edition). School Psychology Review, 30(1), 89 & 31.
Kranzler, J. H., Flores, C. G., & Coady, M. (2010). Examination of the Cross-Battery Approach for the Cognitive Assessment of Children and Youth From Diverse Linguistic and Cultur al Backgrounds. School Psychology Review, 39(3), 431-446.

Open Document