Women In The Crucible

824 Words2 Pages

The Crucible relates the infamous incident of the Salem Witch Trials as an allegory to the McCarthyism era of the twentieth century. Although the play was written to criticize the negative effect that mass hysteria on the lives of many Americans, it also comments on the different social status of men and women. Specifically, as Joseph Valente has said, The Crucible makes the women the scapegoats of the play while using male privilege to excuse the behavior of men. When the play is analyzed through a feminist lense, the role of women and their relationship with the male characters serve to subjugate them under the more prominent and lenient status that men enjoy.
Throughout the play, women are shown as being domestic figures, whereas men play the important roles in society. For instance, after John Proctor discovered Mary Warren in Parris’ household, the readers find out that Proctor had “forbade [her to] leave the house.” Although Mary Warren was Proctor’s servant, the image of a dominant male figure dictating the life of a …show more content…

The acceptance of the stricter codes that women must live by increase the pressure and ease with which women are accused. For instance, towards the end of the play, Elizabeth Proctor accuses herself of John’s crime of adultery, saying that it requires a “cold wife to prompt lechery.” Elizabeth’s guilt stems from her deviance of being the angel in the house. Instead of being a mother who devoted herself to her kids and husband, she thinks of herself as a cold, detached wife who left her husband with no choice but to commit adultery. The accepted subjugation of women to men leads to women feeling guilty and accusations themselves of the crimes of others, which allows for women to be easily falsely accused. On the other hand, the portrayal of men being noble, pure characters illustrates male privilege excusing men from their own crimes and

Open Document