Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Role of Women in Ancient Rome
Women's role in ancient times
Roles of women in past societies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Role of Women in Ancient Rome
In this analysis, an examination will be provided on how sources from Pompeii and Herculaneum can be interpreted to make known the role and status that women of first century AD possessed. Specifically, reference will be made to the Fresco from the triclinium of the Villa of the Mysteries, Inscription of the Eumachia Building and the tablets of Poppaea Note. Nevertheless, prior to analysing the evidence that these sources reveal; it should be noted that the women of Pompeii are not to be placed in a homogenous grouping. This is a result of the diversified roles and status that women occupied in Pompeii and Herculaneum. To provide a comprehensive analysis of the roles and status women possessed, the report will be categorised into a domestic, professional and slave context; to ensure the dichotomy in the grouping of women is made explicit. …show more content…
As described by Joanne Berry in “The Complete Pompeii” the fresco is “thought to initiation into a secret cult, either of Dionysus, god of mystic ecstasy and wine or a secret women’s cult”.
The villa is interpreted to delineate twenty women participating in a continuous scene beginning with “ritual purification and preparatory offerings” and terminating in a “dance of initiation”. Regardless, of the women being depicted as human beings in control of their actions, the small numbers of men are illustrated as submissive and in the possession of the mythological realm. This is inferred through Dionysus, the god of wine and mystic ecstasy, positioned on Ariadne’s enthroned
lap. Once more, “the spatial qualities of the composition and the rendering of the figures themselves” reinforce the dominance the women are possessive of. Though the usage of “bulky and volumetric” shapes and the poses being employed to demarcate the artwork women are repeatedly featured possessing ascendency over their mythological male counterparts. Moreover, the only mythological character illustrated in a dominant role is a female winged demon; who is hypothesised to be a “mortal player dressed in ritual garb”. Through this examination of the artwork, it can be inferred that the creator stylised the frieze to render an image revealing the statuses of significance women of Pompeii were able to occupy in elusive cults such as Dionysus. This can be supported on the conjecture that the women initiating the cult rites are delineated as dominant modes in the artwork. Regardless of mythological creatures being depicted as evident focal points; the commissioner’s intent is made evident through the submissive nature that is shown between mythological creatures and women as exhibited in Dionysus reclining on Ariadne’s lap. Furthermore, the conjecture that women were able to hold positions of great prestige in cults can be extracted from recent scholars providing evidence that the “portrait of the seated domina on the west wall may be Istacidia Rufilla, a public priestess of Venus”. As proposed by Silberberg-Pierce “her self confident bearing and relaxed posture suggest her role as materfamilias”. As matron of the house, whom may have also been a priestess of the cult, Rufilla would have been integral in commissioning the artwork. Through Rufilla holding a position as priestess it can be revealed through the fresco that women of Pompeii were able to occupy particular roles in elusive cults. Additionally, a statue of Livia as priestess was located in the Villa of Mysteries, alluding to her possible residency. Silberberg-Pierce infers “the presence of this statue and the one of her as priestess found in the Eumachia, coupled with Livia's connection to the priestess Mamia, indicate that there was a close community of religious women in Pompeii and possible cult activity at the Villa of the Mysteries”. Therefore, it is can be reasoned that the fresco in the Villa of the Mysteries reveals that women of Pompeii occupied roles as priestess in secret cults. Allowing for women to occupy statuses of renown within their restricted community featured in a domestic context. The Eumachia Building is inferred to have been a meeting hall and headquarters for the guild of fullers (cleaners, dyers and cloth-makers). This is extracted from the writing on the inscription, which states, “the fullers dedicated this statues”. Cite Through the inscription dedicated to Eumachia it can be reasoned that women of Pompeii possessed the capability to occupy status of prestige in a professional context. In Eumachia circumstance, the success she obtained permitting her to be a benefactor to fullers is often argued to of been a result of birth and marital arrangements. It is to be noted that Eumachia by birth and marriage was a member of the Pompeian office-holding establishment. This can be presumed through analysing the name of her son written upon the inscription, Marcus Numistrius Fronto. “These Numistrii were established within the office-holding elite, which typically cemented its position with benefactions and general patronage”. In spite of this lessening the status Eumachia was privy to, it is to be noted that the infrastructure of Pompeian society in First century A.D was dualistic by nature. Consequently, “laws, conventions and moral standards that codified social behaviour” dictated the roles women were able to possess. The polarity found in the roles women occupied in comparison to men is demonstrated through men being responsible over the government and administration of Pompeii. Regardless of a women’s inability to hold political offices or vote, they were eligible to be priestess or own property. Evidently, this is exemplified through Eumachia possessing a role as public priestess and being a beneficiary to the guild of fullers. Moreover, it can be denoted that public priestess held a position of influence within their community. Alike, fellow priestess Mamia’s tomb, the positioning and size of Eumachia reveals evidence that priestesses, despite exemption from the authorative infrastructure of Pompeii were of a notable status.
The Etruscan society allegedly migrated from Tuscany or Lydia. (Klien, 166) Much of what scholars know regarding Etruscan society is based on funerary artwork. The Etruscans did not keep any written records of their activity. What we know about Etruscan lifestyle is based on their artwork left behind. Early on Etruscan society had a lot of contact with the Greeks that reflect in much of the Etruscan works of art. The distinction in Etruscan art and Greek art is clearly seen through the Etruscan representation of couples in art. The pieces in this collection will attempt to show how women in Etruscan society enjoyed a liberal lifestyle in contrast to Greek and Roman counterparts. Etruscan women were adorned with lavish jewels, had a public life and accompanied their husbands at banquets. Etruscan women were affectionate mothers, and passionate lovers.
Cole's article is not to attack Aristotle on his views of where a woman should be placed within the social and political order, in accordance to the Classic Greek period. Her intrigue is within "surveying some central values of that particular social and political institution," (Sterba 79). At first she begins with Aristotle's view on gender and class in ethics. Making a definite point among the social/political class, ancient Greek women and slaves were only allowed their male citizens to think for them. Being dependent on men silences the women and slaves without a voice to speak out, for the women work while the men socialize with others, the men assume that the women do not need a voice. According to Aristotle, even a woman's virtue is to be subservient to all males. As a part of common life the woman is considered the pack horse and the mother to raise the children, for the men. With all the work that women put into their specific households, some education and training would mature from the experience. It was thought again by Aristotle within; Deliberation, Education, and Emancipation, that woman did not possess the aptitude for practical reasoning. For whomever possessed practical reasoning carried with them authority on their decisions and the action pending. From these three classic Greek examples of how women were considered mentally and treated physically, the author Cole provides a progressive outlook of how women could have gained social and political power in a society of male dominant figures.
This paper will discuss the well published work of, Pomeroy, Sarah B. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity. New York: Schocken, 1975. Print. Sarah B. Pomerory uses this book to educate others about the role women have played throughout ancient history. Pomerory uses a timeline to go through each role, starting with mythological women, who were called Goddesses. She then talks about some common roles, the whores, wives, and slaves during this time. Pomerory enlightens the audience on the topic of women, who were seen as nothing at the time. Men were seen as the only crucial part in history; however, Pomerory’s focus on women portrays the era in a new light.
Over the course of time, the roles of men and women have changed dramatically. As women have increasingly gained more social recognition, they have also earned more significant roles in society. This change is clearly reflected in many works of literature, one of the most representative of which is Plautus's 191 B.C. drama Pseudolus, in which we meet the prostitute Phoenicium. Although the motivation behind nearly every action in the play, she is glimpsed only briefly, never speaks directly, and earns little respect from the male characters surrounding her, a situation that roughly parallels a woman's role in Roman society of that period. Women of the time, in other words, were to be seen and not heard. Their sole purpose was to please or to benefit men. As time passed, though, women earned more responsibility, allowing them to become stronger and hold more influence. The women who inspired Lope de Vega's early seventeenth-century drama Fuente Ovejuna, for instance, rose up against not only the male officials of their tiny village, but the cruel (male) dictator busy oppressing so much of Spain as a whole. The roles women play in literature have evolved correspondingly, and, by comparing The Epic of Gilgamesh, Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, and The Wife of Bath's Prologue, we can see that fictional women have just as increasingly as their real-word counterparts used gender differences as weapons against men.
In ancient Greek society women lived hard lives on account of men's patriarch built communities. Women were treated as property. Until about a girl’s teens she was "owned" by her father or lived with her family. Once the girl got married she was possessed by her husband along with all her belongings. An ancient Greece teenage girl would marry about a 30-year-old man that she probably never met before. Many men perceived women as being not being human but creatures that were created to produce children, please men, and to fulfill their household duties. A bride would not even be considered a member of the family until she produced her first child. In addition to having a child, which is a hard and painful task for a teenage girl in ancient civilization to do, the husband gets to decide if he wants the baby. A baby would be left outside to die if the husband was not satisfied with it; usually this would happen because the child was unhealthy, different looking, or a girl.
Lefkowitz, Mary R., and Maureen B. Fant. Women's Life in Greece and Rome. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2005.
Women in antiquity did not have an easy lot in life. They had few, if any, rights. Surviving early records of the civilizations of antiquity from ancient Greece, Egypt, China, and Rome suggest the diversity of women’s roles differed little from region to region. There were a few exceptions, mostly concerning women of nobility and the city-state of Sparta. Excluding the rare instances mentioned most antique women were generally limited on education, mobility, and almost all possibilities interfering with domestic or childbearing responsibilities. The limited social roles of women in antiquity suggest the perceived c...
Greek and Roman women lived in a world where strict gender roles were given; where each person was judged in terms of compliance with gender-specific standards of conduct. Generally, men were placed above women in terms of independence, control and overall freedom. Whereas men lived in the world at large, active in public life and free to come and go as they willed, women's lives were sheltered. Most women were assigned the role of a homemaker, where they were anticipated to be good wives and mothers, but not much of anything else. The roles of women are thoroughly discussed in readings such as The Aeneid, Iliad, Sappho poetry, and Semonides' essay.
Any examination of women in Livy’s writing demands not only a literal interpretation of their character development and values, but also must account for their symbolic importance—thus creating a much more complex representation. Livy, an ancient historian, authored The Early History of Rome to be an exploration of Rome from its foundation, focusing on historical events and societal organization. In it, he examines the patriarchal society that stabilized Rome throughout its dominance. However, as a result of this explicitly defined hierarchy in Rome, women were seen as secondary figures in society. Most were viewed as submissive and passive, and it was well within the rights of men to assert their dominance—many women even agreed with these values. This can be seen in Livy’s portrayals of such women as the Sabine women, Horatia, and Lucretia. Yet Lucretia provides an interesting complexity to the exempla of women. On a symbolic level, Lucretia is an important catalyst in affecting the political organization of Rome. This representation is furthered with Livy’s descriptions of Lavinia, Rhea Silvia, and Verginia. Despite the work of Livy to create an accurate portrayal of women in ancient Rome, other authors showed women to actively defy this patriarchal society he describes. However, Livy’s effort to create the most accurate explanation of early Rome through a historical representation drives this discrepancy in characterization through genre. Therefore, Livy’s work serves as both an accurate and complex examination of the role of women in ancient Rome. According to Livy, a woman’s role was defined by her sacrifice; culturally, women were to be subordinate to men in the patriarchal structure of society, but also served as important...
of the book. USA: Simon and Schuster, Inc. 2000. The.. Print. The.. Blundell, Sue. Women in Ancient Greece.
The society in which classical myths took place, the Greco-Roman society was a very patriarchal one. By taking a careful gander at female characters in Greco-Roman mythology one can see that the roles women played differ greatly from the roles they play today. The light that is cast upon females in classical myths shows us the views that society had about women at the time. In classical mythology women almost always play a certain type of character, that is to say the usual type of role that was always traditionally played by women in the past, the role of the domestic housewife who is in need of a man’s protection, women in myth also tended to have some unpleasant character traits such as vanity, a tendency to be deceitful, and a volatile personality. If one compares the type of roles that ladies played in the myths with the ones they play in today’s society the differences become glaringly obvious whilst the similarities seem to dwindle down. Clearly, and certainly fortunately, society’s views on women today have greatly changed.
For the most part, women in today's society hold a position equal to that of a man;
In the Greek society women were treated very differently than they are today. Women in ancient Greece were not allowed to own property, participate in politics, and they were under control of the man in their lives. The goddess Aphrodite did not adhere to these social norms and thus the reason the earthly women must comply with the societal structure that was set before them. Aphrodite did not have a father figure according to Hesiod, and therefore did not have a man in her life to tell her what to do. She was a serial adulteress and has many children with many men other than her husband. She was not the only goddess from the ancient Greek myths to cause doubt in the minds of men. Gaia and the Titan Rhea rise up against their husbands in order to protect their children. Pandora, another woman in the Greek myths, shows that all evil comes from woman. Aphrodite, Gaia, Rhea, and Pandora cause the ancient Greek men to be suspicious of women because of her mischievous and wild behavior.
Women’s lives are represented by the roles they either choose or have imposed on them. This is evident in the play Medea by Euripides through the characters of Medea and the nurse. During the time period which Medea is set women have very limited social power and no political power at all, although a women’s maternal and domestic power was respected in the privacy of the home, “Our lives depend on how his lordship feels”. The limited power these women were given is different to modern society yet roles are still imposed on women to conform and be a dutiful wife.
Women were often subjects of intense focus in ancient literary works. In Sarah Pomeroy’s introduction of her text Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves, she writes, “Women pervade nearly every genre of classical literature, yet often the bias of the author distorts the information” (x). It is evident in literature that the social roles of women were more restricted than the roles of men. And since the majority of early literature was written by men, misogyny tends to taint much of it. The female characters are usually given negative traits of deception, temptation, selfishness, and seduction. Women were controlled, contained, and exploited. In early literature, women are seen as objects of possession, forces deadly to men, cunning, passive, shameful, and often less honorable than men. Literature reflects the societal beliefs and attitudes of an era and the consistency of these beliefs and attitudes toward women and the roles women play has endured through the centuries in literature. Women begin at a disadvantage according to these societal definitions. In a world run by competing men, women were viewed as property—prizes of contests, booty of battle and the more power men had over these possessions the more prestigious the man. When reading ancient literature one finds that women are often not only prizes, but they were responsible for luring or seducing men into damnation by using their feminine traits.