Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Modern liberalism vs conservatism
Modern liberalism vs conservatism
Modern liberalism vs conservatism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Modern liberalism vs conservatism
Many changes occurred in France during 1789 until 1799. This ten-year span, not only brought major upheaval to the government, but to social aspects within the country as well. Both, Edmund Burke’s, Reflections on the Revolution in France and Mary Wollstonecraft’s, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman’, were published during this revolutionary time period. Although Burke and Wollstonecraft possess contradicting views, their works both include opinions about justice, equality and tradition. Burke’s conservative views persuade the reader to understand that the government follows a natural and cyclical path just as nature does. Wollstonecraft directly retorts by insisting that individuals, not nature, control society and therefore the path it takes. She also insisted that these individuals needed to alter their ways in order to revolutionize society for the better.
To better comprehend the strict perspectives of these authors in relation to their political and social views, it is crucial to understand the terms liberal and conservative. The Oxford English Dictionary defines liberal as, “supporting or advocating individual rights, civil liberties, and political social reform tending towards individual freedom or democracy with little state intervention.” Wollstonecraft asserted that change was vital for society to thrive. Furthermore, conservative is defined as, “that conserves or favours the conservation of, an existing structure or system (now esp.) designating a person, movement, outlook, etc., averse to change or innovation and holding traditional ideas and values, esp. with regard to social and political issues” (Oxford English Dictionary). Burke essentially wanted France to stay immutable. Reform was needless; the government...
... middle of paper ...
...the ability to modify the shortcomings within society. Regardless of their viewpoints, both authors offered their opinions about justice, equality and tradition. Both raised factual information that causes the reader to speculate more critically about the topics at hand. Whether it is today or in the 1790’s, political parties will always have differing views.
Works Cited
Burke, Edmund. “From Reflections on the Revolution in France.” Class handout.
"Conservative, n. and adj.". OED Online. December 2013. Oxford University Press. 14 February 2014 .
"Liberal, adj. and n.". OED Online. December 2013. Oxford University Press. 14 February 2014 .
Wollstonecraft, Mary. “From A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” Class handout.
Conservatives, ideology places the values on status quo. They have difficulties accepting changes, and believe that change should be taking at a slow pace. They believe that human institutions are the product of a gradual process of experience. Conservatives believe slow changes would be more effective over a long period of time. time. They believe changing institutions and practices would affect the would affect the underlying structure. Conservatives be that it is not realistic to expect that that changes in institutions and practices would replace the existing without causing chaos.
Edmund Burke was an Irish political theorist and a philosopher who became a leading figure within the conservative party. Burke has now been perceived as the founder of modern conservatism. He was asked upon to write a piece of literature on the French Revolution. It was assumed that as an Englishman, Burke’s words would be positive and supportive. Given that he was a member of the Whig party, and that he supported the Glorious Revolution in England. Contrary to what was presumed of him, Burke was very critical of the French Revolution. He frequently stated that a fast change in society is bad. He believed that if any change to society should occur, it should be very slow and gradual.
He stated that “the power of perpetuating our property in our families is one of the most valuable and interesting circumstances, and is that which tends the most to the perpetuation of society itself”. Burke argued that men have a right to benefit from their work, and to the means of making their work profitable. He believed private property was an important foundation of a working society, and no one deserved to have what is theirs taken away or portioned out unfairly. He claimed that laws should be put carefully in place to prevent men from acquiring property and wealth unfairly, but as long as that condition is met, Burke rebuts the French revolutionary’s views about property ownership. Moreover, Burke saw the revolution as a struggle for increased power rather than freedom. He asserted that only the corrupt thought in terms of their own individual rights, accentuating the unethical nature of those behind the revolution. He concluded that those behind the revolution cared more about money and their own personal gain, rather than the benefit of the people, prompting him to oppose the revolutionaries and their corrupt, selfish reasons for
Beginning in mid-1789, and lasting until late-1799, the French Revolution vastly changed the nation of France throughout its ten years. From the storming of the Bastille, the ousting of the royal family, the Reign of Terror, and all the way to the Napoleonic period, France changed vastly during this time. But, for the better part of the last 200 years, the effects that the French Revolution had on the nation, have been vigorously debated by historian and other experts. Aspects of debate have focused around how much change the revolution really caused, and the type of change, as well as whether the changes that it brought about should be looked at as positive or negative. Furthermore, many debate whether the Revolutions excesses and shortcomings can be justified by the gains that the revolution brought throughout the country. Over time, historians’ views on these questions have changed continually, leading many to question the different interpretations and theories behind the Revolutions effectiveness at shaping France and the rest of the world.
Shapiro, Ian, Rogers M. Smith, and Tarek E. Masoud, eds. Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics. Cambridge ; Cambridge University Press, 2004.
In the analysis of the issue in question, I have considered Mary Wollstonecraft’s Text, Vindication of the Rights of Woman. As an equivocal for liberties for humanity, Wollstonecraft was a feminist who championed for women rights of her time. Having witnessed devastating results or men’s improvidence, Wollstonecraft embraced an independent life, educated herself, and ultimately earned a living as a writer, teacher, and governess. In her book, “A Vindication of the Rights of Woman,” she created a scandal perhaps to her unconventional lifestyle. The book is a manifesto of women rights arguing passionately for educating women. Sensualist and tyrants appear right in their endeavor to hold women in darkness to serve as slaves and their plaything. Anyone with a keen interest in women rights movement will surely welcome her inexpensive edition, a landmark documen...
Association (2003): 31-36. Cambridge Journals Online. American Political Science Association, 30 Jan. 2003. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.
The Strange Death of Liberal America. New York: Praeger Publishers, 2006, pp. 113-117. 216. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Carr, David.
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2004. Romance, Joseph. Political Science 6 class lectures. Drew University, Summer 2004.
Larry Johnston (2008) Politics: An Introduction to the Modern Democratic State, Third Edition, Chapters 2, 3, 7, 8 and 9.
At a personal level, Burke’s assertions appear to support efforts for self-preservation because of his status in the social and political spheres of London. Because he was a Statesman, it was evidently easier for Edmund Burke to advocate slow changes for equality in France because he was already enjoying power in the British House of Commons (par. 32). For that reason, Thomas Paine’s calls for democracy and liberty for the people of France are more appealing. Naturally, if the French needed time to elevate the social and political statuses of the commoners, then the Revolution would not have been necessary. However, the noble-born were not ready to lose their supremacy, and there are very high chances that had they been aware of what the low-class citizens were planning, they would have retaliated with brutal force. Consequently, an upheaval was a need to change France, and anything contrary to that would need concrete proof that the Crown was ready to consider the problems of the people. On that note, contrary to Burke 's views, the people obviously had enough sense to realize that they were never going to have any privileges without force. Correspondingly, Paine 's statement that contemporary times demanded changes was plausible when one considers the fact that the American colonies had previously revolted against the English Crown. Evidently, liberty was in the minds of the revolutionists in France, and that defied all traditions that sustained loyalty to the French
...tory of the American Radical Tradition, ed. Timothy Patrick McCarthy and John McMillian (New York: The New Press, 2011), 569.
The French Revolution was a period of time in which France underwent many changes, many which could be considered revolutionary. France’s whole system and way of being was completely changed. New ideas were proposed everyday. An idea is revolutionary when it is a new idea, when it is something that has never been thought of before. The Declaration of the Rights of Women written by Olympe de Gouges on September 1791, was one of the ideas proposed to the National Assembly (Hunt, Web 1). The document proposed that since the French Revolution was all about finding equality for all people, women should be equal to men and therefore, should have the same rights as men did. Women at the time live in terrible conditions. They had little access to education, and therefore could not enter professional occupations that required advanced education, were legally deprived of the right to vote, and were not considered citizens (Class Discussion Notes). If equal rights were not given to women, the French Revolution had not reached its full potential, according to Gouges. She expressed this idea in her document, saying, “This revolution will only take effect when all women become fully aware of their deplorable condition, and of the rights they have lost in society” (Gouges, Web). Anyone that questioned the Revolution was immediately put to death (Class Discussion Notes). If Gouges’ document and ideas were important enough to catch the attention of the National Assembly and for her to be put to death, her ideas could be considered important and revolutionary (Britannica, Web 1) But, the document was not revolutionary. The Declaration of the Rights of Women was not a revolutionary document because its ideas were taken from other people and were no...
Cooper, Barry, Allan Kornberg and William Mishler. The Resurgence of Conservatism in Anglo-American Democracies. Durham: Duke University Press, 1988. Print.
Mary Wollstonecraft was a self-educated, radical philosopher who wrote about liberation, and empowering women. She had a powerful voice on her views of the rights of women to get good education and career opportunities. She pioneered the debate for women’s rights inspiring many of the 19th and the 20th century’s writers and philosophers to fight for women’s rights, as well. She did not only criticize men for not giving women their rights, she also put a blame on women for being voiceless and subservient. Her life and, the surrounding events of her time, accompanied by the strong will of her, had surely affected the way she chose to live her life, and to form her own philosophies.