Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of preparing for interviews
Essay about interview preparation
Essay about interview preparation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of preparing for interviews
Witness Statement: On Friday June 1, 2018 at approximantely 20:40, I PFC. Austin Berry accompanied by SPC. Christian Negron, PFC Samantha Hixson, and PFC. Dallas Creager as we were driving North Bound down Kunia Road from the shopping outlets in Waikele back to Schofield. At approximantely 20:45 we drove by what appreared to be a man chasing a woman down the left hand side of the road, both of whom exited a dark in color SUV which appreared to be a Toyota 4Runner. At this point we thought it was a possible domestic and decided to turn around the first chance we got a little ways down the road. After a few cars had passed we finally got the chance to turn arround. After we had made the U-Turn and started to pull off to the side of the road the headlights illuminated a black in color Truck who seemed to have vererred off the road and made contact with a telephone pole at speed, and had made a 90 degree turn up on to a …show more content…
At this point we could tell there was still occupents inside of the vehicle. At this point we put on the the hazards and get to the vehicle as soon as possible. Hixson, Creager and myself exitted Negrons car and made our way to the totaled vehicle to check the statues of the occupants and find a way to get them out as safely and as fast possible. Hixson dirrected to the passanger side of the vehicle and started trying asking if the older gentlement was okay, while trying to find a way in. Creager and myself dirrected to the driver side of the vehicle. Creager started working on the door trying to open it up while myself started tending to the driver of the vehicle. I started to ask him simple question to test his situational awarness of the accident and to see where he could be injuried and if
On Tuesday, May 17, 2016 at approximately 1956 hours, Officer Reinbold #7400 and I (Officer Guerrero #3310) were dispatched to 1113 Marengo Avenue, in regard to a vandalism that just occurred. Dispatch advised the victim (later identified as Kristyn Cota) saw two male juveniles spray painting her fence. Cota advised dispatch she was following both subjects and they were last seen running southbound on Marengo Avenue, from Hammond Street. The first suspect was described as male Hispanic, approximately 15 years old, wearing a gray shirt and dark colored shorts. The second suspect
On 01-01-17 at 0023 hours I was monitoring the radio and heard that Officer Harrell #3441 and Officer Thebeau #8402 were involved in a vehicle pursuit in the area of Fair Oaks Avenue and Corson Street. I responded to the above location to assist. They advised responding units that the suspect was involved in a traffic collision on the eastbound 210 Freeway Fair Oaks Avenue off-ramp.
On May 22, 1990 two Sacramento County sheriff’s deputies were responding to a call to break up a fight. While returning to their cars one of the officers, Murray Stapp noticed a motorcycle moving at rather high speeds. The motorcycle was being operated by 18-year-old Brian Willard and carrying a 16-year-old passenger by the name of Phillip Lewis. Neither the operator nor the passenger of the motorcycle had anything to do with the fight being responded to.
With the help of Katherine Ketcham, Dr. Elizabeth Loftus wrote Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness, and the Expert Who Puts Memory on Trial to speak out for all of the victims of false accusations in the justice system making readers think twice before putting someone in jail for life. It puts the injustices of memory into perspective. Loftus is an expert witness in court cases where there is no sufficient evidence against the convict other than that of eyewitness testimony. She speaks to the falsities of memory as a psychology expert. This advocate has worked for the defense of convicts from Ted Bundy to lesser known mistakes such as Howard Haupt. Her goal is to keep innocent people out of jail as anyone can be accused;
The novel Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness, and the Expert Who Puts Memory on Trial goes into great detail about the encounters an expert witness, on memory especially, might come across by telling true stories from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus’s experiences with the help of Katherine Ketcham. It also provides information about Loftus’s work and research on memory and its limitations and malleability (Loftus & Ketcham, 1991). Applying research on memory to this novel allows one to better understand the implications of the prosecutor’s case more effectively.
Often, previous or new knowledge of an experience will alter our memories. That is why the use of Eyewitness testimony in judging a suspect is highly controversial. Many people believe that eyewitness testimony can be highly unreliable. On the other hand, many believe eyewitness testimony to be the most trustable and accurate way in deciding on the final verdict.
Time is one of these factors, evidence shows that when eyewitnesses were interviewed shortly after the act had taken place the more accurate the description was, while the longer an eyewitness goes before being questioned about identification the more likely it is there will be a false identification. Another factor that can play into this is other eyewitnesses to the act. In a study in which students were exposed to a criminal act after the act was committed the professor put false information as to the hair color of the
Eyewitness testimony has long been viewed as important evidence in court cases. The general population believes eyewitness identification more than any other evidence, even if the witness account is conflicting with the other evidence presented. Studies show that eyewitness testimony is unreliable, and yet it is still considered the most important form of evidence. People think that if a person says they saw something then it must have happened. Currently there are no universal guidelines on how to obtain and present such evidence. The purpose of this paper is to explain why eyewitness testimony is unreliable, and discuss the proposed guidelines on how law enforcement agencies should gather identifications, as well how the courts should handle such evidence. The author will begin by providing a history of eyewitness testimony and the studies that have been done regarding the validity of eyewitness identifications. Next, she will discuss eyewitness identifications and why they are unreliable. Finally, she will address the proposed universal guidelines for law enforcement agencies and the courts.
“In the front seat was Gregg, driving, Sarah, in the middle, and Robyn, on the passenger side. In the rear seat was Jeff, behind the driver, Haley, in the middle, and Rachel, on the passenger side. EVERYONE was wearing their SEAT BELTS, as is our family habit. EVERYONE walked away from this accident with only bruises. The only blood was Robyn had small nicks from glass in a couple of places on her right arm and right leg.
Examining the entire case and comparing psychological perspective with the eyewitness testimony and that reason for the false confession, I concluded that, the victim husband was under the stress creating due to the trauma of been witness of such horrible crime and the loss of his love one. Other factors such as the weapon effect in which a person pay more attention to the weapon than faces, colors or any other details. In addition, the time crime occurs, the lightness of that location, and that fact that the perpetrator approaches the victim from behind were significant factor for a person to be confused about what real happen during the crime and certainly identify a perpetrator.
Witness, suspects, and victim statements, can as easily make a case as it can break one. Statements can help lead investigators to a conviction or to freedom. They can lead to absolutely nowhere, or create a break in the case that solves the crime. This is why is critical for an investigator to know what to look for when taking statements from witnesses, victims and suspects. The areas of expertise an investigator must know about include; understanding psychological damage and the toll witnessing a crime can take on a person, what the investigator must do to get reliable and credible evidence from victims and witnesses, and how to translate this into a court setting, with evidence that will stand up in court.
I’ve got some questions and would like to go over what happened at the accident.” Officer Daniels had explained what happened at the scene of the accident. Tiffany’s blue sedan was traveling down the I-5 South when a car crossed the center line and hit the guard rail, spinning it around to collide with Tiffany’s car head on. It looked like Tiffany tried to stop and swerve but there was no escaping it.
- Our investigations with the local authorities revealed that Mr Walter does not have any outstanding traffic offence(s) currently. During our interview, he had taken photographs of the insured vehicle while waiting for the tow truck to tow it away. These photographs were subsequently forwarded to us. - From these photographs, we noticed that the damages sustained on the vehicle were mostly at the front and right portion as a result of the collision. The general surroundings observed in these photographs seem to conform to the circumstances of the accident and the information that were narrated to us by Mr Walter.
My colleague and I received an emergency call at 03.40hrs to reports of a two-vehicle road traffic collision. Once on the scene it was confirmed as a high-speed collision. I was given a brief handover from the lead paramedic who was dealing with a patient that had sustained serious deceleration injuries due to the mechanisms involved. The paramedic stated,” the patient is mechanically trapped we have to wait for the fire service to cut him free”. Our priority at this stage was to prevent further deterioration of the patient and to promote his recovery by means of reassurance, pain relief in addition to treating the various injuries that he had sustained. I calculated the fire brigade would be with us very shortly, due to the fact the occupants of the other car involved were being extricated and loaded into awaiting ambulances by members of The Hazardous Area Response Team (HART). I decided that this would be an appropriate time to lead a discussion within the group on how the extraction would take place.
It was a typical Monday morning as I drove home from work, exhausted from having to perform more than twenty four hours of duty. Windows down, Oakley sunglasses adorn my tiresome face to block the shimmer of sunlight from my sensitive eyes. Anxiously looking forward to the softness of my pillow, I pushed the accelerator to the floor propelling my car into overdrive. Zipping by the night club Area 151 was when I notice him lying on the ground, motionless. With tires screeching I quickly came to unrehearsed stop, the rush of adrenaline and flashes of my military training captivated my mind, transferring me into autopilot. As I ran over to his location yelling “hey buddy are you ok” following the ABC’s of first aid, I could not help but notice the large pool of blood from the deep laceration on his face, the twisted front wheel of his bicycle, and a strong stench of alcohol coming from his liquor stained John Sport backpack. “All my beers are broken” was all he muttered as he fell trying to get regain his footing, relieved that the fellow was alive I immediately called the police. As I spoke to the paramedics on the situation I could not help but ask myself “how could someone be so intoxicated at this time