More handpicked essays just for you.
Factor affecting criminal behavior
Factor affecting criminal behavior
Effects of domestic violence on australia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factor affecting criminal behavior
A young man accused of murdering an old man has been found mentally competent to stand trial in Brookvale on murder charges. Albert Winston was arrested yesterday after he told the police officers that he killed an 87-year-old man named Drew Reid, by suffocating him with a heavy mattress. The neighbours called the police as they heard a shriek coming from Drew's house. 4:00 a.m., the police inspected the house and consequently, Albert admitted to allegedly killing the old man as well as buried his body under the lonely floor boards. Moreover, Albert stalked Drew for seven nights straight. For the reason being that Drew's glass eye is like a vulture's, Albert killed
Convicted for the murders of his wife and two kids, thirty-four years ago, Dr. MacDonald still endures the agony of being accused of killing his family. Even after twenty-four years of imprisonment and several unlawful court hearings, additional documentation continues to up hold Dr. MacDonald’s testimony.
Winston Peacock, a man with a rumoured fortune, would always wave to Jenny Goodhart, who delivered his newspaper. On January 2nd, he didn’t come out to wave to Jenny and she noticed he hasn’t picked up his milk. She peeked inside and saw he was laying on the floor so she biked to the police station. After investigating, the police came to the conclusion that Winston committed suicide with his own gun because he was depressed and there was no way for anyone to get in or out of his house.
On May 7th 2000, fifteen year old Brenton Butler was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens, who had been fatally shot in the head while walking down a breezeway of a hotel with her husband. Two and a half hours later, Butler is seen walking a mile away from where the incident occurred, and is picked up by the police because he fit the description of the individual who shot Mary Ann Stephens. However, the only characteristic of the description that Butler featured was the color of his skin. Police then brought Butler to the scene of the crime in order for Mary Ann Stephens’s husband, James Stephens, to confirm whether or not Butler was the individual who had shot his wife. Almost immediately, Stephens identifies Butler as his wife’s killer.
On April 28, 2004, after closing on his dream house, William McGuire was brutally murdered. His body was severed into three pieces, placed into three matching Kenneth Cole suitcases and then dumped in the Chesapeake Bay. The investigation of his murder would span three years, involve two different investigative teams and end in the conviction of his wife, Melanie McGuire, based on circumstantial evidence (Glatt, 2008).
The Greenland Natives were killed around 1000 A.D and many assumed that Leif Erikson was the murder. However, the time that this occurred Erikson was around the age of 8. How could an 8 year old kill all those natives? The answer is that he didn’t kill them, his father did. Erik the red was Leif’s father and the culprit of the Greenland Native’s deaths. Some people may have associated Leif with his father or just thought Leif did it all. But according to Saga Of Erik The Red, c. 1000 Red did it all.
Billy Joel once sang, “Only the good die young”. In life, it is true, the young and innocent seem to touch more lives around us than anyone else. In the Casey Anthony trial, Anthony was a suspect in the murder of her daughter Caylee. Caylee’s life shouldn’t be counted in years, it should be counted by how many lives she affected, the love she has gained, and the support the country has given her to find out what really happened. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a boy killed his father; however, both cases were challenged by the obvious and the abstruse evidence. Large cities towards the east coast, in 1982, Twelve Angry Men, and 2008, Casey Anthony Trial, affiliated with two major trials able to modify the lives of the living and the dead. For that reason, during the Casey Anthony case, jurors were conflicted throughout the trial.
When viewed from a strictly medical, psychological aspect, Andrea Yates medical history indicates that after the birth of her first child, she began to suffer from various forms of depression and suicide attempts. If one only examines the paper trail and doesn’t think beyond what the medical history does or does not indicate, then perhaps, Andrea would be innocent by reason of mental insanity as the 2006 acquittal suggest. However, when viewed form a legal aspect there are several inconstancies that challenge if this former nurse was insane or if she in fact premeditated the murder of her children as well as her acquittal.
My studies show that the patient’s actions during my interview with him were unusual, he was oddly calm about explaining in detail what he had done to the old man. I asked the defendant why he would do such a thing as killing the old man. He tells me the old man never did him wrong, “I knew what the old man felt and pitied him” (Poe 204)., it was the eye that tortured my patient. “a pale blue eye...my blood ran cold...thus
... others that as soon as they claim they hear voices or are claim they killed someone because they did not like the way a person’s eye looked that they can get off on a lighter sentence. The defendant has planned all of this out, and if it works out the way he has planned it, there will be a murderer released from a mental institution after a short period of time instead of being locked up for the rest of his life with the other criminals like he deserves. If this person were insane, he would have not have mentioned anything about the old man’s fortune if it were so unimportant that he would have never mentioned it at all. The States believes that the defense has failed to prove it burden of 51% and this man must be convicted and sent to a prison before he murders someone else and uses “insanity” as an excuse again.
The narrator loved the old man, he had nothing against the poor old man. (Poe,pg 104) As the narrator says, “I loved the old”. If the narrator had nothing against the old man, why did he murder him? My client murdered the old man because he was hallucinating. A normal person wouldn’t murder someone if they don’t have anything against them. He was also hallucinating because a typical person wouldn’t murder another human because of their eye. The narrator declares (Poe,pg 104) “for it was not the old man who vexed me, but his Evil Eye”. This reason of murdering someone is not equitable. In addition, by the end of the story the narrator acts as if he is hallucinating. “I know grew very pale...Yet the sound increased-and what could I do?...It grew louder-louder!” Obviously this was inside the narrator’s head, the police officers couldn’t hear the heart beating because the narrator spieled (Poe,pg 107) “the officers heard it not”. The narrator also declares (Poe,pg 107) “that sound would be heard by a neighbour”. This quote confirms my client also thought that the neighbours will hear the heartbeat, that was inside his head. My client took these major steps because he was hallucinating the whole time. These hallucinations prove his insanity.
First, Poe suggests the narrator is insane by his assertions of sanity. For example, the narrator declares because he planned the murder so expertly he could not be insane. He says, "Now this is the point. You fancy me mad. Madmen know nothing. But you should have seen how wisely I proceeded-with what caution-with what foresight-with what dissimulation I went to work!" In addition, every night at midnight the narrator slowly went into the room of the old man. He claims this was done so wisely that he could not be insane. The narrator thinks that if a murder is carefully planned then the murderer is not insane. Also, the narrator claims he suffers from over acuteness of the senses. Regarding the sound of the old man's beating heart, the narrator says, "And now have I not told you that what you mistake for madness is but over-acuteness of the senses? --now, I say, there came to my ears a low dull, quick sound, such as a watch makes when enveloped in cotton". The narrator claims he is not imagining the sound but he is hearing it because his senses are so sharp. The narrator believes he is justified in killing the old man because the man has an Evil Eye. The narrator claims the old man's eye made his blood run cold and the eye looked as if it belonged to a vulture. Poe shows the narrator is insane...
This proves that the narrator is fair-minded because most mad people do not experience guilt in which the narrator did. Also, the narrator was hearing the beat of the old man's heartbeat which was actually his. The more the police questioned him the louder the beat got. “Villains!” I shrieked, “dissemble no more! I admit the deed!- tear up the planks!-here, here!-its is the beating of his hideous heart(Poe page 207)!”
On March 13, 1964 a woman by the name of Catherine “Kitty” Genovese was coming back to her apartment in Queens, New York at 3:00 a.m. when she was impaled to death by a serial killer. According to the news, the said attack was about 30 minutes long. During the attack, Kitty Genovese screamed for help numerous times. The killer left the scene when the attention of a neighbor was attracted. Ten minutes later, the killer returned to the scene and murdered Genovese. It came to attention that 38 people witnessed the attack and murder, but all thirty-eight failed to report it until after the murder. This ordeal got the attention of many people including scientists and psychologists who wanted to figure out why this occurred. Later, the events that were published by the news were found to be false. It seemed as if the news was experiencing the bystander effect as well, because their information did not contribute to the actual facts. There were not 38 witnesses to the crime, but several had heard the screams and a few calls were made to the police during the attack. But there was still talk about something that affected the minds of people during emergency situations. This phenomenon has become known as the Bystander Effect. There were several cases that are fairly similar to the Genovese one. As well as the Genovese case, these occurrences attracted the attention of many scientists and even the news had something to say about “apathy.” Is the bystander effect real? My hypothesis is that the bystander effect is in fact, a real everyday occurrence that limits the help offered by people. This is due to the number of bystander present during a given situation. The Bystander Effect is the social psychological idea that refers to cases in whi...
Winston Peacock’s death is a case of murder due to the fortune he was rumored to have hidden within his house. Winston Peacock was reputed to have an immense fortune within his household and a motive for murder would be to obtain his hidden treasures. The case report confirms that Peacock lived alone and was reputed to have a fortune tucked away somewhere in his house. This represents a motive of murder and how someone would be willing to kill Winston Peacock if they have the possibility of seizing his hidden treasures. However, in order to find the time and maximize the opportunity to find his fortune the only way is to get rid of the distraction and kill Winston Peacock. Also, after analyzing the crime scene you can speculate that the murder
The Jury will find the defendant not guilty of murder by reasoning of insanity. Only an insane person would kill someone they loved because of a creepy eye that was constantly on his mind. Also only an insane person would hear voices and talk to them and himself. The narrator is insane and is not guilty of murder. Will you return the right