More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare Teddy Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson
Compare Teddy Roosevelt to Woodrow Wilson
Movements in the progressive era on political
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Wilson vs. Roosevelt In the first two decades of the twentieth century the national political scene reflected a growing American belief in the ideas of the Progressive movement. This movement was concerned with fundamental social and economic reforms and gained in popularity under two presidents. Yet Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson espoused two different approaches to progressive reform. And each one was able to prevail upon congress to pass legislation in keeping with his own version of the progressive dream. These two people, although they had different principles in mind, had one goal: to make changes to the nation for the better of the people and the country. Setting out to reach this goal, Roosevelt came to be a president of the common man while Wilson became the “better” progressive president. Even though they were both progressives, the two presidents had different paths in mind for the future of the United States. Their different perspective and priorities were evident in their speeches: New Nationalism by Roosevelt and New Freedom by Wilson. Wilson's New Freedom looked to the destruction of all trusts to promote economic competition and permit small businesses once again to flourish. While the federal government was to use its power on a one-time basis to bust all trusts, the federal government was to have no role in regulating business. Any regulation would have to be done by state governments. This contrasted markedly with Roosevelt's New Nationalism,...
During the 20th century many different presidents went in and out of the doors of the White House serving the country the best they could. However, two of these men hold a place in American history as perhaps the greatest leaders that had ever served our country. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson are two extraordinary men that symbolize the hope and aspirations of the American people during such a tumultuous time in United States history. Both of these men held leadership qualities like no other, had strong views for America, and held exceptional ideas on foreign policy.
Teddy, with a prominent military background and a strong love of big game hunting, than Wilson with a strong intellect background, a very organized and “to the books” personality. Some similarities between the two presidents are that they both decreased the exposure of big businesses. Roosevelt with his famous policy that broke up major railroad, oil, and steel conglomerates, later leading to the Federal Trade Commission. Now with Wilson, The Wilson Administration banned child labors and instituted maximum hours legislation for railroad workers.Teddy was always a hands on president, very active and boisterous. Wilson was more of a reclusive and composed president. Many people debate which president was better, but nothing can deny that both presidents left a legacy on the United
Compare and contrast the foreign policies of Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson. Which do you think was a more effective president? Why?
Both envisioned gradually reforming the international system, both to safeguard America from predatory Old World politics and to put in place laws. Roosevelt was a Republican/Bull Moose Progressive and his progressive agenda was mostly based on a philosophy of a strong Federal government. Thus his initiatives helped to grow the Federal government and increase its authority/power. For example he pushed for more government regulations of business, the food industry, established national parks and forests. He was aggressive with foreign policy, and was willing to use military power/influence in American foreign policy to get his way on certain initiatives such as building the Panama Canal and saying we should "Speak softly and carry a big stick".
The Progressive Movement was a welcoming concept to many Americans. As America continued to advance the people needed a government that also changed, so “As Americans ushered in a new century they began to demand change, equality and reform and the progressive era was born.” (The Progressive Era, n.d.) The current president’s first campaign slogan sounded incredibly familiar to the Progressive Movement. As in the late nineteenth century, citizens were tired with the business as usual approach and they wanted an entirely new direction for the country and they were promised “change”. As both generations would learn there is a fine line between change and being disappointed.
Thesis The Progressive Era and the New Deal Era had a significant amount of similarities with policies and programs to reform the American society and improve lives and fight poverty in America. Although the Progressive and New Deal Era had many similarities, there were still differences between them. Both the Progressive and the New Deal Era’s main goal was to improve American society. Both of the Progressive and New Deal’s accomplishments were rooted in the economic depression and the need for change before the era, the Guilded age in the 19th century for the Progressive era, and the Great Depression for the New Deal era. As the Guilded Age was ending, and the Progressive Era was emerging, most American families had to live with the harsh reality of sweatshops, slums, child labor, corruption in government and businesses, disease, and racial prejudice.
Theodore Roosevelt stressed more for people to be responsible than to be autonomous, or, in other words, to help others besides helping themselves. He was able to bring two separate groups together to make a better America. He brought the Trusts that wanted the government to stay away and then the other side that wanted the government to "smash" the Trusts (Howland). There were also companies that realized that they needed the help of the government if they wanted to survive. When Theodore Roosevelt went into office, he made it his mission to get everyone what they deserved, a "square deal.
All the Progressive presidents helped set up today's economy and social policies. However, Roosevelt and Wilson had the most lasting impact on today. They esablished labor laws still in effect today, and both protected the consumers from high prices set by the Trusts. The Trusts were diminished of their powers during the Progressive era, and a stronger government was put into place. This further eliminated the Trusts' influences over the earlier weak government.
The New Deal period has generally - but not unanimously - been seen as a turning point in American politics, with the states relinquishing much of their autonomy, the President acquiring new authority and importance, and the role of government in citizens' lives increasing. The extent to which this was planned by the architect of the New Deal, Franklin D. Roosevelt, has been greatly contested, however. Yet, while it is instructive to note the limitations of Roosevelt's leadership, there is not much sense in the claims that the New Deal was haphazard, a jumble of expedient and populist schemes, or as W. Williams has put it, "undirected". FDR had a clear overarching vision of what he wanted to do to America, and was prepared to drive through the structural changes required to achieve this vision.
Roosevelt and Taft were split on the tariff, while Wilson’s New Freedom platform agreed with Roosevelt on a reduction of duties on manufactured goods. Roosevelt championed women’s suffrage, while Taft and Wilson left the topic out of the debate. Today, Clinton and Sanders argued for equal pay for women while Donald Trump and the Republican Party pledged to defund planned parenthood. Clinton and Trump wanted to raise taxes on the super-rich or put an end to the tax loopholes that they so often take advantage of. Sanders called for breaking up the largest banks in the nation; Trump and Clinton stayed mum on the topic. In a way, Sanders’ campaign promises were very much a modern version of Teddy Roosevelt’s from 1912: changes to the minimum wage laws, conservation of the environment, women’s rights, changes to workplace environments and benefits, and effecting change in big business (Greenspan, 2012, para. 7). However, there is and never has been a solid line drawn between one person’s political beliefs and another’s. Two people may feel differently about some issues, while strongly agreeing on others. The most striking similarities between the 1912 and 2016 election seasons come when you recognize why the winners won and the losers lost. In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt and William Taft could not agree on the issue of trusts. In fact, they downright hated each other on a personal level. When Roosevelt split from the Republican Party, he
Virtue theory is the best ethical theory because it emphasizes the morality of an individual in which their act is upon pure goodness and presents as a model to motivate others. Aristotle was a classical proponent of virtue theory who illustrates the development habitual acts out of moral goodness. Plato renders a brief list of cardinal virtues consisting of wisdom, temperance, courage, and justice. This ethical theory prominently contradicts and links to other theories that personifies the ideal being. However, virtue theorists differ from their own expression of these qualities yet it sets a tone that reflects on the desire to express kindness toward others.
Roosevelt’s ideas were known as more realistic, and in many ways, more successful. Theodore Roosevelt’s New Nationalism reflected ideas for big business to boost America’s economic success and worldwide power, big labor unions to protect the people, and big government to keep it all regulated. In contrast, Woodrow Wilson’s New Freedom reflected nearly the opposite: small business, small labor unions, and small government. It respected the free market and state’s rights. (Solheim, 79) As previously stated, both of these progressive ideals calls for a balance of power, but in ways that are humorously opposite. Roosevelt’s domestic policy was known as the Square Deal. He aimed to bust powerful corporate trusts, passed laws to ensure the safety of food and drugs, and federally protected millions of acres of land, preserving America's natural resources. He also helped laborers to get a “fair shake at the negotiating table.” (Brands, 337) Wilson also did much to help America’s domestic situation, such as creating the Federal Reserve and advocating women’s suffrage. He expanded upon
I believe that "New Freedom" and "New Nationalism" can be compatible because they share similar qualities but also could not be compatible for the reason that their ideas on how to run the country are different. "New Nationalism" states that putting individual needs ahead of the nations needs is wrong, which a point the two speeches have in common. Another similar point "New Nationalism" and "New Freedom" share is that both candidates show familiar judgment in without huge corporations there would less of a gap between the rich and the poor. Also without this gap of the rich and poor, our nation would be better as a whole. "New Nationalism" acknowledged that monopolies and trusts are acceptable as long as they are being of service to the people. "New Freedom" motioned that the nation should discharge all monopolies so that there would be less need for government interference. Wilson accredited this because he believes that monopolies are shown to be secured by government and can essentially control the regime because of all the money they give.
In this paper, I argue about the applicability of virtue ethics which is one of three major branches of normative ethics. The subject of virtue ethics is normally defined as one that puts emphasis on virtues which are also known as moral character. The branch is in contrast to the majority of the approaches which places a lot of emphasizes on responsibilities and rules. The practice is also known as deontology or the practice which emphasizes on the results of actions. It is also known as consequentialism (Swanton,11).The way virtue ethics is applied in modern philosophy should be clearly evaluated.
Aristotle once stated that, “But if happiness be the exercise of virtue, it is reasonable to suppose that it will be the exercise of the highest virtue; and that will be the virtue or excellence of the best part of us.” (481) It is through Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics that we are able to gain insight into ancient Greece’s moral and ethical thoughts. Aristotle argues his theory on what happiness and virtue are and how man should achieve them.