Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexism in jane eyre
Impact of colonialism
Jane Eyre And Rochester Essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexism in jane eyre
Throughout history, literary works have been used to make social and political statements and encourage discourse between its readers and others. They provide insight into the views of the times during which they were written, and sometimes they are critical and try to instigate change. For ages, characters and plotlines have served to enlighten and entertain entire societies. When a novel comes along that manages to carve into the hearts of humanity for generations, resonating with people across time. In this case, two novels are working in tandem to make their points, advocating for equality from two different perspectives. Jane Eyre and Wide Sargasso Sea, acting as two sides of the same story, serve to comment on the rampant sexism and racism …show more content…
She does not run away, she does not launch an attack, and she is unable to preserve her past self while under Rochester’s thumb. She has no real power, as it all lies in the hands of her husband. The amount of control that Rochester has over Bertha’s life clearly characterizes him as a powerful figure, but it is how he uses his power that earns him the title of “male oppressor”. This is shown through the narrative structure displayed in the second half of Jane Eyre; it is what earns Rochester the right to be called truly oppressive. He saw Bertha “safely lodged in that third story room, of whose secret inner cabinet she has now for ten years made a wild beast’s den” (Bronte 360). In other words, Bertha was confined to one room for ten years, with only one woman to talk to. In this way, Rochester controls every aspect of Bertha’s life. He even goes so far as to claim that it was for her own safety—she was “safely lodged” and a “wild beast”. Bertha has no speaking lines at all when her story is being told. Again, she is at Rochester’s mercy. Again, she is the passive victim to Rochester’s controlling force. Again, Rochester is shown to be the male oppressor while his wife is the oppressed female. …show more content…
In Wide Sargasso Sea, Rochester represents everything wrong with imperialist cultures—he has no respect for the culture that he finds in Jamaica. He insults the country almost as soon as he arrives, saying that Amelie is “sly, spiteful, malignant perhaps, like much else in this place” (Rhys 59). Later, Rochester willingly beds Amelie (Rhys 127), who is half-caste, despite her being so representative of the land that he clearly loathes. This shows that Rochester is capable of overlooking his prejudices when it suits him—like when he wants comfort, of the physical variety. However, the morning after, he reverted to his original, racist ways. All of a sudden, Rochester is focusing on her skin color, noting that “her skin was darker, her lips fuller than [he] thought… [He] had no wish to touch her and she knew it” (Rhys 127). The fact that these features, typically characteristic of those with African ancestry, are what made Amelie so unappealing to Rochester all of a sudden, is very indicative of his views. He is willing to take advantage of them, but he is unable to desire them. He can assert his power, but not show the slightest bit of compassion. He is truly an unsympathetic colonizer, taking what he wishes and giving nothing in return. This reflects the view of imperialism from the perspective of the colony (wholly negative and demeaning),
Although “Jane Eyre” and “Sula” are two completely different stories that were written in different eras and take place in two completely different settings, they both address the issue of women’s rights. For centuries, women have been considered as less equal than men and they have struggled for equal treatment and opportunities. Both stories r...
This scene is probably the best one to create the suspense of the novel. It keeps a person interested in the book and wanting to know what happens next. There is no way of knowing why this happened, who does it, or if Mr. Mason is going to live or die. That is why Charlotte Bronte used violence to create this kind of suspense. So a person would be interested enough in the novel to keep reading. The mystery is a mystery itself, there is a secret at Thornfield and Jane can sense this. Then there is the mystery of the person who committed this act of violence. Jane suspects who it might be, but she is not for sure. To find out the mystery of the house and the person who did it a person has to solve it. Finally, there is the characterization of Bertha. From the way Rochester talks about Bertha at first she seems pretty normal, but he says how she become after they get married. She turned into someone he did not know, a crazy psychopath, mad woman. Rochester wanted to hide this from everyone even Jane, Bertha cares for no one but herself. She does not care who she hurts, she proved this when she hurt Mr.
Often, Rochester tricks her into answering questions in a way he deems unsuitable, simply to chastise her. He does this when he questions her about her mother’s death and again when he calls her dressing habits into question (Rhys). Rochester adds to his horrible treatment of Antoinette when he has sex with Amèlie. According to Rajeev Patke, “[h]er husband’s deliberately casual adultery with a coloured servant in Antoinette’s house distastes and dispossesses her of the only place she had learned to identify herself with as her natural habitat and patrimony” (192). Serving as the ultimate betrayal and reinforcing the bitterness and trust issues that Annette drilled into her head, Antoinette becomes more unstable.
...ing novels of their time. They both revise aspects of their era, that would rarely, if ever, have been touched on. Wide Sargasso Sea having the double revision of challenging Jane Eyre, as well as social beliefs. “The devices that connect the two texts also rupture the boundary between them. Although this rupture completes Rhys’ text, it results in a breakdown of the integrity of Bronte’s.” As much as Bronte’s text was revolutionary of her time, so too was Rhys’. Time changed and what was once revolutionary became simplified and unbelievable. The fact remains, that without Jane Eyre, there would be no Wide Sargasso Sea, the two text’s are mutually exclusive, and just as revolutionary now as when they were written.
In Jane Eyre, Charlotte Brontë clearly demonstrates the relationship between sexuality and morality in Victorian society through the character of Bertha Mason, the daughter of a West Indian planter and Rochester's first wife. Rochester recklessly married Bertha in his youth, and when it was discovered shortly after the marriage that Bertha was sexually promiscuous, Rochester locked her away. Bertha is called a "maniac" and is characterized as insane. Confining Bertha for her display of excess passion reinforces a prevalent theme in Jane Eyre, that of oppressive sexual Victorian values. Bertha's captivity metaphorically speaks on the male-dominated Victorian society in which women are inferior and scorned for acts of nonconformism.
Bertha and Mr. Rochester were set up and pressured into marrying each other. Mr. Rochester claims that isolating Bertha in a secret room is a justifiable act because of her mental instability. However, The Bertha that the reader gets to see exhibits an accumulated maniacal rage as a result of her imprisonment. Jane describes her as a savage woman. The very sight of her when she attacked her brother or when she ripped the wedding veil traumatized Jane. However, Bertha impacted more than her safety. When Bertha is revealed to be Mr. Rochester’s wife, Jane finds out that despite the love she and Mr. Rochester have for each other; Jane can be nothing more than a mistress because it is illegal to divorce an insane women who is not in control of her actions.
Charlotte Brontë's 1847 novel Jane Eyre depicts the passionate love Jane Eyre and Edward Rochester have for each other, and as Bertha Mason stands in the way of the happiness of Brontë's heroine, the reader sees Mason as little more than a villainous demon and a raving lunatic. Jean Rhys' serves as Mason's defendant, as the author's 1966 novella Wide Sargasso Sea, a prequel to Jane Eyre, seeks to explore and explain Bertha's (or Antoinette Cosway's) descent into madness. Rhys rejects the notion that Antoinette has been born into a family of lunatics and is therefore destined to become one herself. Instead, Rhys suggests that the Cosways are sane people thrown into madness as a result of oppression. Parallels are drawn between Jane and Antoinette in an attempt to win the latter the reader's sympathy and understanding. Just as they did in Jane Eyre, readers of Wide Sargasso Sea bear witness to a young woman's struggle to escape and overcome her repressive surroundings. Brontë makes heavy use of the motif of fire in her novel and Rhys does the same in Wide Sargasso Sea. In Rhys' novella, fire represents defiance in the face of oppression and the destructive nature of this resistance.
Despite Rochester’s stern manner and unhandsome appearance, Jane still finds herself falling in love with him. During her first encounter with Rochester Jane describes him
When Bertha Rochester is first introduced in the novel she is much of a mystery. Her name isn’t stated and it isn’t really clear if she is the one causing trouble. Jane has assumptions of who might be committing all these problems. Bertha tries to kill Mr. Rochester by setting the curtain around his bed on fire. Jane is hearing things inside her room and wished she kept her candle on so she could see. Jane says, “This was a demoniac laugh-low, suppressed, and deep-uttered, as it seemed, at the very keyhole of my chamber door. The head of my bed was near the door and, I thought at first the goblin-laughter stood at my beside-or rather crouched by my pillow: but I rose, looked around and could see nothing; while, as I gazed, the unnatural sound was reiterated: and I knew it came from behind the panels. My first impulse was to rise and fasten the bolt; and my next again to cry out, who is there?” (155) Jane stated that “Something gurgled and moaned. Ere long, steps retreated up to the gallery toward the third-story staircase: a door had lately been made to shut in that staircase; I heard it open and close and all was still.
... the anger that she had expressed as a young girl, due to the fact that her society does not accept it. This anger that she once held inside is prevelant in Bertha's act. It is in the Red Room that Jane "became increasingly alive with bristling energy, feelings, and sensations, and with all sorts of terrifying amorphous matter and invisible phantoms" (Knapp 146). This igniting energy and flow of feelings, are very similar to those that Bertha realises at Thornfield.
Of Wide Sargasso Sea it has been said that the portrayal of the persons of color within the novel are flat and one dimensional. This assessment would be accurate in its claim unless we look at how their characters are seen through the eyes of the White and Creole character Bertha Cosway (Mason) and Mr. Rochester. We see this racial veneer (though not so thin or decorative in any sense) first early in Antoinette’s childhood with a little girl named Tia. Ironically, the two became friends after Tia began to follow her and sing “Go away white cockroach, go away, go away” (Wide Sargasso Sea, Part 1 Pg 13).
Racial tension is a major theme in “Wide Sargasso Sea”, with the mix of whites and blacks and white/blacks in the novel creating a cut-throat atmosphere which creates a hazardous place for Jamaica’s denizens. Many racial situations occur between whites and blacks, which Americans are use to due to the dangerous troubles between blacks and whites in the 1950s with a clear enemy: the whites. But Rhys tackles a more important point: an overall racial hostility between everybody living in Jamaica during the novels time period with no one to blame. Instead of using only racism, Rhys uses situations her readers could easily relate to such as: betrayal, adultery, and feeling of not belonging. Through her use of alternating points of views, Rhys uses racism shared by both characters and their actions/faults and thoughts to meld and to show the blame cannot be placed onto one person.
Rhys divides the speaking voice between Rochester and Antoinette, thus avoiding the suppression of alternative voices which she recognises in Bronte's text. Rochester, who is never named in the novel, is not portrayed as an evil tyrant, but as a proud and bigoted younger brother betrayed by his family into a loveless marriage. His double standards with regards to the former slaves and Antoinette's family involvement with them are exposed when he chooses to sleep with the maid, Amelie, thus displaying the promiscuous behaviour and attraction to the ...
The novel Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte and Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys were produced at different times in history. Indeed, they were created in different centuries and depicted extensively divergent political, social and cultural setting. Despite their differences, the two novels can be compared in the presentation of female otherness, childhood, and the elements that concern adulthood. Indeed, these aspects have been depicted as threatening the female other in the society. The female other has been perceived as an unfathomable force that is demonic in nature but respects these enigmatic threatening characters. The female other has been portrayed as intensely alienated while grows knowing that their actions are subject to ridicule, rumor,
When Rochester changes her name to a white cultured name, Bertha, Antoinette addresses him about the fact by asking, “’My name is not Bertha; why do you call me Bertha?’” (Rhys 103). By calling Antoinette Bertha, Rochester is trying to ignore the black half of her and pull out the white culture. Rhys has Rochester call her this to show that he has complete control of her identity and life. Rochester can see how Antoinette is losing her identity when stating, “’I scarcely recognized her voice.