Why We Shouldn T Gmo Be Banned Essay

1527 Words4 Pages

Many plants we eat today are a result of some genetic modification. Scientists have been altering genes of food crops for decades in order to boost food production and make crops more resistant to environmental issues such as the weather, diseases, droughts and cold fronts. Communities across the world are fighting the cultivation of genetically modified crops, saying they pose grave health concerns and environmental risks. Affirmative Argument The affirmative group argues that GMO’s are unsafe and therefore should be banned, and that alternatives should be found to address the coming global population explosion and food crisis. Their first point is that GMO’s pose production and consumption risks. They explain that the production of GMO’s has risen significantly over the past 15 years. …show more content…

They also explain how it allows viruses to mutate and build immunities. Their third point is that GMO’s may potentially be harmful to other crops due to gene migration, causing a lowered resistance to antibiotics. Their fourth point is that GMO’s have major health consequences, such as cancer, Alzheimer’s Disease, reproductive organ damage and diabetes. Finally, their fifth point compares production efficiency of GMO crops versus non-GMO crops. They state that “some studies” show that GM crops do not have higher yields. They also go on to say that “some do”, but the insertion of genes into the best conventionally bred seeds may be an alternate explanation. They also mention that superweeds can be created and GM crops do not reduce the total amount of pesticides used. They propose several alternatives for the impending food crisis, but their sole solution is to not be so wasteful with food. Their first proposition is to reduce the amount of wasted food. They say that “1/4 to 1/3 of all food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted.” Their second proposition is investing in

Open Document