Why We Shouldn T Animal Testing Be Used In Biomedical Research

1122 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Animal experimentation ethical treatment

Biomedical researching can be very harmful to animals, but many other people think biomedical testing would not harm animals. Animals are always used for research and are put in harm from being used as test dummies. Animals are not given a choice to be tested they are put into research labs for only the benefit of human health. Some people believe animals should be used for testing, others believe animals should not be used for testing even though it may benefit themselves. Biomedical research can be used for benefiting human health, but instead of using animals for research they are other alternatives like microdosing (Prycoft). Animal testings can cause many animals to be in more harm than they were already in. Researchers cause harm to animals …show more content…

In addition, animals get placed in a cage and are being put in tremendous amount of harm. Animals being used for research get badly mistreated and suffer from what scientists do to these creatures. Scientists put these animals in so much discomfort just to be used for biomedical research and they suffer from these testings. These creatures are supposed to live in the wild not feel discomfort by scientist who bring danger to them. Scientist just put animals in danger and misery for the benefit of human health, and the scientist do not even care about what they are doing to these creatures. For example, a video was released by the Ethical Treatment for Animals showing a scientist who was cutting off a goat’s leg for research and the researcher just whistled as if he did not hear the goat screeching in pain (Bever). Another example showed that these chimpanzees …show more content…

Animals are put in harm for no reason when a treatment or cure fails. Research may not work on humans but can work on these creatures, so testing is not able to work. Testings are not always effective and can cause research on animals to be insufficient. Research that fail cause risk to both humans and animals. If the treatment or cure fails creatures are being put in harm for no reason because the treatment is not always able to work. Critics were mentioning that animal research may not always work because there are differences between humans and animals (Gorman). Since there is a difference in body systems from humans and creatures critics said animals are not a good model for biomedical research (Pycroft). Chimpanzees and humans share ninety eight percent of their double helix, but that two percent not shared can cause the testing to not work on humans (Gorman). Biomedical research fails to work on humans nine out of ten percent of the time then on animals (Pycroft). If biomedical testing would work on humans and not cause any harm to these creatures then many people would support the research. There are other alternatives than just using animals as technology has increased so there are other models instead of these creatures. To sum it all, biomedical research is not always effective on humans when trying to find a cure or treatment as there are other

Show More
Related

  • Animal Testing Dbq

    597 Words  | 2 Pages

    One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1737 Words  | 4 Pages

    Millions of Mice, rats, dogs, primates are used in laboratories to test products of all kinds. They are imprisoned in small cages, forced to try new products with results that may have many dreadful or/and painful effects. More than that, animals used for testing are treated badly. For instance, mice and rats are forced to inhale noxious fumes, rabbits are held down by vices and have caustic chemicals applied onto their skin and eye. Some animals develop strange reactions resulting from the loneliness they had to face when in cages; they would shrink in fear every time someone passes by them, they would rock back and forth, pull their own hair, and spin in circles (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, PETA). In the scientific world animals...

    Read More

  • Animal Testing Cruel And Inhumane

    532 Words  | 2 Pages

    Over 100 Million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned and abused in testing Labs every year. Animals are used to test the safety of products, advance scientific research, and develop models to study disease and to develop new medical treatments all for the sake of mankind. Animals should not be used for scientific research because animal testing is inhumane, other testing methods now exist, and animals are very different from human beings.

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.

    Read More

  • Ethical Dilemma: Animal Testing in Medical Research

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year about 100 million animals suffer through being poisoned, shocked, and burned for unsuccessful medical research. Some may believe that animal testing is a crucial part to medical research and should be used more frequently. Others believe the pain and suffering inflicted upon the animals is morally wrong and should not be done, no matter what benefits come from it.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing: Unnecessary Pain for Dubious Gain

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animals and humans have different genes meaning that the products being used are going to have different effects on different species (Burrell). After a drug has been tested on a animal, the drug still has to go through a human trial. Which means that the drug they just spent all that time testing on the animal, still needs to be tested on a human to actually make it purchasable. Sadly, “92% of experimental drugs that are safe and effective in animals fail in human clinical trials because they are too dangerous or don’t work” (“11 Facts”). Meaning that most of the drugs used on animals, actually are not benefiting humans. A few of the drugs passed from animals, were detrimental to humans. For example, a arthritis drug tested on mice, seemed to protect their hearts, but when used on humans, it was the cause of heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths (“12 Pros and Cons”). Even when some drugs are passed, they show some side effects that were not shown during the test trial. Animals have been used to help the “war on cancer”, but the tests haven’t transferred from humans to animals. The former head of the National Cancer Institute, Richard Klausner, has stated, “The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. We have cured mice of cancer for decades and it simply didn’t work in humans” (“Animal Testing”). Meaning that they have learned the ways of curing mice with

    Read More

  • Ethical Ethics Of Animal Testing

    700 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every year approximately 100 million animals are killed as a part of scientific research in the United States alone. Animal testing is a highly controversial practice in the modern world. There are records of animals being used in biological and medicinal research as far back as 384 BCE with the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. Many people believe animal testing is unethical as it is bringing harm to animals in order to benefit humans. Ever since the beginning of this practice, animal testing has been used for a variety of purposes, all of which are inhumane and unethical.

    Read More

  • The Harm of Animal Testing

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout history, animal testing has played an important role in leading to new discoveries and human benefit. However, what many people forget are the great numbers of animals that have suffered serious harm during the process of animal testing. Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies. The development and enhancement of medical research has been based on the testing of animals. There are many questions being asked if animal research is good or not or if the benefit for us is way greater the abuse of animals. Doing tests on animals can help find ways to cure diseases, but testing on them is wrong. Although we want to find cures for diseases to help many people, testing on animals not only brutally hurts them but it also denies the animals the rights they have.

    Read More

  • Unmasking the Cruelty in Animal Research

    802 Words  | 2 Pages

    The morals of a modern society entails protections for all species of life. Humans do not have the nature to not inflict harm on innocent animals around the world.Animal research is unjust and neglectful to species in every animal kingdom.The animal kingdom has been disturbed since men step foot on this earth. Some people are so selfish that the only thing that look over is about their own selves and not other humans or living things in this world. Animal rights is a big thing to some people and to others it not this paper talks about how it's cruel to research on animals, how research doesn't improve health,and how it's not regulated.

    Read More

  • Medical Beneifits Of Animal Testing

    390 Words  | 1 Pages

    When someone goes to the store and buys a product, or is prescribed medication, they don’t have to worry if the product is safe to use nor should they. The entire human race benefits from animal research. “Without animal research, medical science would come to a total standstill”(O’Neil 210). It is not as if Scientist and researchers just sit in their labs all day and torture animals for fun. Not to mention animal use is being reduced as much as possible, “most scientist are glad to use alternative test because they are usually faster and cheaper than test on animals”(Yount 72). However, “you cannot study kidney transplantation or diarrhea or high bloodpressure on a computer screen”(O’Neil 212). Besides, “Animal research has led to vaccines against diptheria, rabies, tuberculosis, polio, measles, mumps, cholera, whooping cough, and rubella. It has meant eradication of smallpox, effective treatment for diabetes and control of infection with powerful antibiotics. The cardiac pacemaker, microsurgery to reattach severed limbs, and heart, kidney, lung, liver and other transplants are all possible because of animal research”(O’Neil 210).

    Read More

  • Should Animal Testing Be Banned Essay

    713 Words  | 2 Pages

    Using animals as testing models for scientific research has become one of the serious issues in the world. According to Procon.org, almost 26 million animals are used for scientific testing every year in the United States, and more than 10 thousand animals died in those testing experiments. Many scientists believe that animal testing is necessary because it can help humans to develop more scientific research. However, the truth is that many animal testing experiments usually fail when they are used in humans. Therefore, animal testing should be banned because human’s DNA is not similar to animals, there have better ways, and animals have right.

    Read More

  • Animal Research and Testing, Is it Ethical?

    2169 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout centuries medical research has been conducted on animals. “Animals were used in early studies to discover how blood circulates through the body, the effect of anesthesia, and the relationship between bacteria and disease” (AMA 59). Experiments such as these seem to be outdated and actually are by today’s means, scientists now study commonly for three general purposes: (1) biomedical and behavioral research, (2) education, (3) drug and product testing (AMA 60). These three types of experiments allow scientists to gain vast amounts of knowledge about human b...

    Read More

  • The Cons of Animal Testing

    1354 Words  | 3 Pages

    Millions of animals are used to test consumer products, but they also become victims of experiments for medical research. In The Ethics of Animal Research (2007) both authors state that there have been many medical advances with the development of medicines and treatments as a result of research conducted on animals (para 1). These medical improvements have helped many people be able to enjoy life, but some people still believe that animal research is mean and avoidable .... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    Throughout the years animal rights groups and organizations have frowned upon animal experiments. Animal testing has been thought to be inhumane and cold-hearted to animals. Because of these accusations medical researchers have to suffer threats from individuals and the media. If animal testing weren’t allowed would that be a drawback in advancement in medical research? Animal testing is beneficial to people because these trails lead to improvements in medical research. Animal experiments have led to finding new cures and vaccines to fatal illnesses. Because animal experiments are helpful in making vaccines to prevent these sicknesses, these trails are the reason so many lives are saved. Animal testing is very necessary and useful to people, but animal rights groups believe that these trails doesn’t benefit humanity. According to Ellen Paul, “Breakthroughs in treating injuries, like practically all medical advances, depend upon experimentation on animals.” Animal experiments have given way to many new instruments to fight against diseases like cancer (Paul). For example, mice and other rodents contributed to scientists developing new tools for fighting different forms of cancers (Paul). Animal testing has helped science in many ways, but animal organizations like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) believe that these experiments are cruel to animals. Even though most animals endure some sort of pain during these experiments, the results are very beneficial to people.

    Read More

  • Should Animals Be Used for Scientific Research?

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...between animal research and medical benefit. Animal research is an important tool to develop new drugs or treatments and ensure the safety of the drugs. As a result, animal research is hard to be replacing by other research method. If animal research is banned, it will be a disaster for the biomedical research because most of the new medications cannot be test appropriately before releasing to the public. It may also increase the danger of the drugs. In fact, the government can make law and regulation to become more strictly on animal research. It is ironic that people who are against animal research, but at the same time they are enjoying the benefit of animal research, such as taking any drug which is tested on animals. Animal research is tricky ethical decision to make, but the benefit for human is so huge therefore animals should be allow to use for research

    Read More

More about Why We Shouldn T Animal Testing Be Used In Biomedical Research

Open Document