Why We Should Not Be Held Responsible For Children's Crimes

1526 Words4 Pages

In a world where the line between childhood and adulthood is hazy, the question of when juveniles should be held responsible for their actions, and committing atrocious crimes, becomes increasingly significant. Teenagers that are committing heinous crimes are usually caused by poor environment and dejected living conditions, however, are given the maximum of a life sentence without the possibility of parole because there should be nothing so serious as to commit a heinous crime. While the juvenile system focuses on rehabilitation and education for the troubled youth, the adult system seeks punishment and retribution. In the juvenile system, the emphasis lies on guiding young offenders towards a positive change, while the adult system holds …show more content…

With the spiking crimes being committed by the youth, the right age a juvenile should be responsible for the heinous crimes they commit is from the age of 16-years-old and up. Although juvenile crime continues to remain a significant problem in modern society, the courts have been involved in regulating the prosecution of youths who commit heinous crimes. In the 1990s, violent crime spiked, and unfortunately, it is still an issue today. In the PBS Frontline Documentary, When Kids Get Life, the newscaster and narrator emphasize, “fifteen-year-old Jacob Ind and a classmate brutally killed his mother and stepfather.” For example, this was a heinous crime committed by two young teenagers who were later sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole and minimum 15-25 years. Since 2005, there have been changes in how the court handles juvenile heinous crimes. Rules and laws have been updated to better address the consequences based on the court case. It’s important to note that the focus on juveniles has shifted towards rehabilitation and providing opportunities for the youth to make positive …show more content…

Therefore she could maybe have another shot with Thomas who she never overcame her feelings for. Dustin and Brittany were both charged as adults. This simply supports the case that the ages of 16 and up should be held fully responsible because at the age of 16 an individual's brain is more developed to actually plan a heinous crime and know that there are serious consequences. In this case, Dustin clearly knew that killing someone could go bad for him as he became nervous when attempting to kill Christa the first time. There are heinous crimes that are committed by younger individuals, although these young individuals do not have the brain to fully plan a murder and know what actually killing a person does. With this being said, at the age of 16 someone is able to plan a crime without knowing the outcome, therefore should be held responsible for the crime committed. Some individuals may have different opinions about holding 16-year-olds fully responsible for their actions when it comes to committing heinous

Open Document