Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tactics and strategies that usa used between 1963 and 1975 against the vietcong essay
Tactics and strategies of the vietnam war
US political position in Vietnam War
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The assertion that the Americans lost the Vietnam War because they failed to win the hearts and minds of the Vietnamese is incorrect. This can proven by examining other aspects of the war such as military tactics , political relationships, finances and other contributing factors. There are, however, opposing perspectives which believe that the Vietnamese people were the core factor of the war and should have been America’s main focus as they would make their job easier as they were the ones that were in the army, at school, at home and at the voting booths deciding the future of Vietnam . America’s success was determined by several factors of which none could be solely liable for their loss. A picture shows an American soldier burning down a hut during a search and destroy mission …show more content…
(source C) which may have angered locals but this represents something much larger and that is the generic and unremarkable tactics used. “The Americans were well armed but slow and clumsy. They were elephants, especially when moving through the jungle”( Source F ) Vietnam has a unique landscape and the Americans made the fatal mistake of not adapting to it. ”US strategy never seemed to take account of this, relying instead on its superiority in military technology. In this sense the Vietnam war has been described as a tragedy for the USA in that its military policy contained the seeds of its own failure.” (Source D) America suffered a defeat in Vietnam but the same forces were engaged in another war against a much less resilient enemy, the American people. Former president Johnson believed that, initially, the only reason America engaged in the war was to avoid being seen as a nation that gave into threats, even though the social issues of America were more important (Source I). This shows that America’s energy was not entirely focused of winning the war but also confronting social issues. The civil rights movement was prevalent during this time period, from 1955 to 1975 which was a far more important issue for Americans ( Source H ). Therefore, political commitment can be a contributing factor to why America lost the war, nullifying the original statement. Americans believed that the Vietcong drew their strength from “hungry peasants “but they drew their strength from hungry peasants who all had the same thirst for independence so although feeding them may have won them over temporarily they had no genuine interest in supporting the Americans (Source E).
“The Americans had realised from an early stage that the war could only be won by winning the support of the South Vietnamese peasants” ( Source A) which as previously proven they were incapable of. The counter however, believes that all the aspects of American success in the Vietnam war were all rooted back to the very people that inhabited it and that democracy would have spread as it became known and loved. The US government was unable to subdue the forces of nationalism, not only through their military tactics but through social relations. In essence this dispute is not about whether or not the Americans would have succeeded if had they had the support of the Vietnamese but rather how the support of the Vietnamese would not have affected it as much because the Vietnamese struggle was for general independence and how other aspects would have still had an equally as important
role.
On the contrary it can be argued that the Americans had lost the war for not being able to win the hearts and minds of their own people and thus already losing support of their country additionally their inability to cope with the rigorous environment of the Vietnamese landscape and the Vietcongs use of guerrilla tactics proved devastating to their war effort.
i. Difficulties faced by soldiers due to the nature of fighting in the Vietnam War - Personnel had difficulties with transportation supplied with adapted vehicles back seat faced rear to provide additional fire power (Source A) – It appears as if the government didn't worry enough to supply men with safe and capable equipment - Threat of traps led to fear as vehicles had to be parked on street at night (Source A) o Check for traps each morning became a daily ritual particularly in fuel tanks (Source A) o A request for a locking fuel cap was denied because weren’t entitled to one” (Source A) • What circumstances would have needed to arise for them to be entitled to one? The Offensive full guard was set up (24hrs a day), personnel got no sleep and were constantly on alert (Source A) – How significant would this have been in the personnel’s mental frame of mind?
The Vietnam War: A Concise International History is a strong book that portrays a vivid picture of both sides of the war. By getting access to new information and using valid sources, Lawrence’s study deserves credibility. After reading this book, a new light and understanding of the Vietnam war exists.
In the early 1960s the U.S. began sending military advisors to South Vietnam beginning the Vietnam War, arguably the most controversial war in United States history. This incident followed Vietnam gaining its independence from the French Empire’s Indochina in 1954. The nation soon split, creating a communist North Vietnam, and a noncommunist South Vietnam. In fear of communism spreading the U.S. supported South Vietnam and sent troops. As the incident dragged on it caused a huge anti-war movement and a lot of political turmoil.The troops were withdrawn in 1973, the whole country fell to communism, and the U.S. failed. How did a superpower such as the U.S. take defeat from a small country like Vietnam? Many have wondered and continue to wonder
In conclusion, I think that the United States became increasingly involved in the Vietnamese War because of the policies they had made as a promise to fight communism, and because they had sorely underestimated Vietcong’s ability to fight back using Guerrilla warfare. They refused to pull out of the war in fear of losing face before the world, but this pride factor scored them massive losses in the war. In the end, with both side sustaining heavy losses, the US were still seen as mutilators in the war, with advanced showing what their intervention had costed, and Vietnam was still fully taken over by Communism – they had achieved nothing and lost a lot.
Should the United States have participated in the Vietnam War? Some people felt that the US should have been there for two reasons. The first reason was the US was attempting to establish a stable democracy. The second reason was that our participation in Vietnam helped the US win the Cold War. Others believed the US should not have participated for two reasons. One reason was that the South Vietnamese government was a brutal dictatorship. Another reason was our strategy for winning the war was inept. While it appeared that we were trying to spread democracy and win the Cold War., in truth we were supporting a mini-Hitler, and our war strategy had little chance of success.
Also, during the revolution the Americans fought to free their country from the oppression of Britain, while in the Vietnam War they used their super power position to try and stop the communist ideology from growing. During the revolution, the American’s emerged as the victors in their fight against Britain. Unfortunately victory in the war against South Vietnam did not occur. The American Revolution war lasted eight years, while, the war against the communists in South Vietnam lasted as long as twenty years (Daly & Robert,
Only in the Vietnam War was the United States’ participation criticized. This is such a gigantic change from prior wars that it bears study as to why it happened, and better yet, should have it happened. This paper will discuss the United States’ involvement in the Vietnam War, by asking the simple question, Should have the United States’ gotten involved in the first place? This paper will prove that, in fact, America should not have gotten involved in the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War took place between 1947- 1975.
Vietnam was a highly debated war among citizens of the United States. This war was like no other with regards to how it affected people on the home front. In past war’s the population of the United States mainly supported the war and admired soldiers for their courage. During the Vietnam War, citizens of the U.S. had a contradictory view then in the past. This dilemma of not having the support of the people originates from the culture and the time period. During this time period it would be the fourth time Americans went to war in that century which made it tough for Americans to give their supportS (Schlesinger 8). Most Americans did not know why the country was getting involved in Vietnam as well as what the United States’ agenda was. This dilemma ties into the short story, “On the Rainy River” which is a passage from Tim O’Brien’s book The Things They Carried.
Most historians view the nature of the Vietnam War as rooted in the history of the French colonies in Vietnam and the growing ethnic, political, and economical division between Catholic and Buddhist Vietnamese. (Brigham, Robert, Hoffman, Kenneth)
The United States was not capable of winning the War because they realized too late that the real war in Vietnam was not a military one but a political one. Beginning with Eisenhower, They were fully aware that the only way South Vietnam would win is with the support of the United States troops. Kennedy restricted the U.
It is understandable that some Americans strongly opposed the United States getting involved in the Vietnam War. It had not been a long time since the end of World War II and simply put, most Americans were tired of fighting. Mark Atwood Lawrence is one of the people who opposed our involvement in the Vietnam War. In his essay, “Vietnam: A Mistake of Western Alliance”, Lawrence argues that the Vietnam War was unnecessary and that it went against our democratic policies, but that there were a lot of things that influenced our involvement.
The Vietnam war has been referred to by many names, one of the longer ones was 'the cornerstone of the free world southeast Asia'. It was called that by John F. Kennedy. He was talking about Vietnam being and essential country in a non-communist world. He believed that if Vietnam became a communist country, all of the surrounding countries would also become communists. This is the main reason America was involved in the Vietnam war. Another reason was that America wanted to spread their “political ideas around the globe”. They wanted to do this so that their anti-communism stance was clear. The public also wanted to keep communism from spreading. To soldiers, the war was like a crusade, a great journey to purge the communists from Vietnam. Sadly, this is not what happened. The Viet Cong (VC) had far better tactics than the US. The VC was told to 'nibble at the enemy' so that he could 'neither eat or sleep'. This worked very well. Another demoralizing tactic the VC used was their landmines; they were designed to blow the limbs off the soldiers without killing them. This tied up hospital beds and meant the soldiers had to carry the wounded back to the base.
They were trained with the three “withs” : eat with, live with and work with peasants. Used great deal of self discipline, respect to values of village, and that earned them respect of the people they tried to win over. They were trained politically and were painted in nationalistic glow and earned the respect of the people. Even when they used violence and coercion, they were successful rationalizing and explaining violence to the peasants. The South in contrast, the unrestrained irresponsibility and incompetence of the generals had led to apathy and disgust among people at every level. “South Vietnam was a society without leadership and without direction – and these essentials the Americans couldn’t provide”. (Tang pg. 53). The southern troops were mere mercenaries as South had trouble recruiting troops. Even the troops that they could get a hold of would bribe the commanders to leave, there were lots of troops on book but not in
The Vietnam War has had its effects on America, both good and bad. We can ridicule it, we can deny it, we can say it was for the best, we can say we shouldn't have even gotten involved, but the one thing we can't do is ignore it. Because it's become an unforgettable part of history, and we all need to remember Vietnam.