Why Smart Objects May Be A Dumb Idea Summary

Draft
Zeynep Tufekci, in her article “Why Smart Objects May Be a Dumb Idea”, argues that some idea that people make are good at first but can behave flaws. Her article can give great examples of what a bad idea is too much of people like most just keep the truth hidden from the public about a product problems.
Tufekci is addressing a company can do most due Chrysler. Her writing is going to take to fact to why most of the thing like entertainment systems can get hacked due to it being connected to the internet for most of the cars use from the computer running the whole thing were hacks can control the whole thing. My argument is why do all these companies do what they think is okay.
She opens about talking about how good idea can become a bad thing in the real wrld ting s can get very hairy. Some of the first things the author brings up are good ideas for making everyday life easier. For example, she talks about a sniper rifle that is equipped with an advanced computer for better accuracy in and a car that lets you stream music from the internet

these are some good view good example of good ideas. She also talks about the risk that are starting with some of them. “Recently, two security researchers, sitting on a couch and armed only with a laptop, remotely took over a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee speeding along the highway, shutting down its its engine as an 18-wheeler truck rushes toward it.” She states this claim to hold up that connects to the internet isn’t always a good idea. She gives that example as an emotional appeal of fear to help understand the danger of being on the highway or even just driving and your car just shutting down in the middle of a road.
It's kind of like when you have your own phone that connects to the internet, you never worry about it getting hacked or information to be stolen, but that stuff does happen even on your phone that don’t have the best security out there on them so for the fact most of the car makers used that approach when it comes to the having the internet in the they’re products. “The early internet was intended to connect people who already trusted one another, like academic researchers or military networks”. This was a good example of when the internet has never been a bad place to go but more of a place of close individual to talk and communicate. The fact now is that there are thousands of people on the internet most of them you most likely don’t even know.
Tufekci also describes how most of the hacker can take all your information and put it on a USB drive without any type of unknown severs being used with the ones knowing that it was even touched there.

She also notes that the people that are going into this business is the home builder and car manufacturing Tufekci calls it “the risky world of information technology Tufekci also included that “although Chrysler quickly recalled all 1.4 million jeeps to patch this particular vulnerability,”. She also notes that it had been over a year before they took great notice, only did so due to the stunt done on the highway and by the national highway traffic safety administration. She describes how to guy are being coach potatoes are just doing this as easy as just turning on a T.V. She says that “Chrysler is far from the only company compromised: from BMW to Tesla to General Motors, many automotive brands that have been

hack….”
She tells readers it took those guys’ years just to hack into the jeeps computers which they were only looking for the errors inside of the code that Chrysler had laid out. Also telling the reader that the most outlandish hacks get people’s attention due to the fact that it could happen to anyone that comes to be with the smallest code errors that can come across the hacker. By which she says that most of the information now a days aren’t as private as it used to be due to the fact of have a car that connects with the internet. She says that “last week, at Def Con, the annual information security conference, researchers set up an internet of things village to show how they could hack everyday objects like baby monitors, thermostats and security cameras.” She tells the reader that connecting to all of these objects like a refrigerator, for example she uses with it knowing all the items in the refrigerator can be hacked just like the car which was talked about earlier, it can be more than ought to start thinking what can go wrong with all of these things that we have as a day to day object in our life to make easier.
Also an important thing that she talks about is that most of the is that this can be fixed through the fact that similar thing have happened to in the past the invoke safety for all cars the example she gives the reader that “In 1965 Ralph published “unsafe at any speed” documenting debates…..manufactures were forced to incorporate safety technology.”
She also talks about how no company wants to pay all that money. But the truth is that most of the company is that don’t send here isn’t the money now will be paying with more than anything. She also brings up the fact that there isn’t a need with the technology in the car that everyone else but it has to be made right in the first places it doesn’t come a big media storm.
The audience that she is going for being the 3 types of people that are the ones that have a brand new jeep, also with the fact that most of the people that can have one are able to buy one. Another type of person is the type that are not a aware of what can happen inside these new cars which many things can go wrong very wrong.
When making good idea it can be held by on dumb diction that someone in charge makes she argues that most of the company that come to up wit he idea are more likely to have mistake climbing into new areas of innovation.