More handpicked essays just for you.
Social impacts of peer pressure in societies
Short essay on self development
Social impacts of peer pressure in societies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social impacts of peer pressure in societies
I wonder how she feels if it was all worth it to her now? When she sits to reflect on the evening filled with beautiful dresses and the succulent food is she remorseful. Does she realize that she is at fault for not only hers but her husband's downfall for the last 10 years? Some would blame the friend that never informed her the necklace was indeed pasted, others may say it was due to society's influence on women when truly the only one to blame was the person who stared herself in the mirror and envied what others may have.
In our current society, many people follow the trends of clothing, decorating, and even technology. Do all of the influences affect us all the same way? In my opinion, NO. I do not allow myself to live up to the standards of society, I live up to the standards of myself. Meredith allowed for the influence and ideas of what would make her appealing to the rest of society affect her everyday life. She frequently daydreamed of a life of grandeur in head knowing that in all reality she would never be able to afford to live up to these standards. Moreover, she frequently would compare herself to those who were better off financially allowing for herself to feel unsatisfied and place a sense of false guilt on her husband.
…show more content…
He was not even given the respect to be fully named in the story. He offered his wife all that he could and was not even thanked throughout the course of events. I do not feel that he is responsible for not being able to provide the finer things in life for his wife. She was aware of his statue when she agreed to marry him and should have made herself content to live within his means. Due to her loss of the necklace, he was not able to live up to his potential and there was no mention of children as in my assumption they feared for the cost of bringing a new life into the mix considering the amount of debt they were in from the loss of the
The Necklace is a great example of how our desires can create tragedy rather than happiness. Madame Forestier would have rather been idolized for her wealth instead of buying items that grant her survival. She says,”It’s just that I have no evening dress and so I can’t go to the party.” which explains well how she had a finite amount of money and thought material wealth was more important than happiness. If she only knew before that she would spend the next decade working off her debt, she would have never asked for the necklace and she would have had a happy life. Furthermore, wealth isn’t the only thing that brings happiness to a life.
“Guy de Maupassant’s, “The Necklace”, is about a young couple who discovers the upper society appears to sparkles like a real diamond necklace, but in reality it is not always true. A decision that seems to protect their integrity turns out to tarnish it – like a fake necklace. However, through ironic insights we witness drama, character revelations and experience surprise” (Clugston, 2010) .The Necklace is told from a 3rd person point of view with limited omniscience. The title suggests that the plot will center on a necklace. So, naturally we, the audience or reader wants to know what the significance of the necklace is. After reading the story I believe that Maupassant used the necklace to symbolize the upper society or wealth. Another symbol that the necklace represents is appearance. In the story Mme. Loisel was a beautiful young woman that had admirers at the reception. She made all the attendees believe she was from...
and Mme. Loisel cooperate to find what seems to be an exact replica of the lost necklace, which they must purchase and return to Mme. Forestier. Mathilde attempts to find a replacement for the necklace to prevent Mme. Forestier from realizing the original had been lost. The couple travelled “from one jeweler to another hunting for a similar necklace” (175). They went together to look for the necklace, which proves that they are exerting mutual effort. M. Loisel uses all means necessary to pay for the necklace. He “made ruinous deals” (187) and “risked his signature” (188) in order to pay for the expensive diamond necklace. Though Mme. Loisel lost the necklace, her husband uses his savings and takes out loans to help her pay for the replacement. The couple acquires the necklace and must return it to Mme. Forestier. M. Loisel brings the necklace home, and “Mme. Loisel took the necklace back” (199) to the owner. The couple collaborates to get the necklace into the hands of its owner. Mathilde and M. Loisel work together to replace Mme. Forestier’s necklace, and she is none the
In 1785, the court jewelers, Bohmer and Basange, constructed a necklace with five hundred and forty diamonds of varying sizes in an ugly arrangement that resembled the collars worn by circus animals. They hoped that King Louis XV would purchase it for his favorite, Madame du Barry. Unfortunately, the king died before the necklace was completed. So, naturally the jewelers tried to sell the piece to the newly crowned Queen, Marie Antoinette, because she was known for her extravagant spending and taste. They priced the jewelry at and equivalent of two million dollars in modern money. The Queen declined the offer. She did not like the necklace and the price was even too high for her. Knowing that they would be ruined if the Queen didn’t buy their product the jewelers continued to plead with her for ten years. Each time she turned them down. Then, one day the Queen received a note signed by Bassange which said, “We have real satisfaction in thinking that the most beautiful set of diamonds in existence will belong to the greatest and best of Queens.” Puzzled by the message, the Queen, put the note to flame by a candle sitting on a nearby table (Komroff 85).
Over the course of the short story, The Jewelry, written by Guy De Maupassant, the main character, M. Lantin, goes through a clear change in personality, behavior, and values. At first M. Lantin is very content with his life and seems to love his wife, Madame Lantin. Then, after her death, M. Lantin is extremely depressed and filled with grief over his wife, however by the end of the story M. Lantin 's personality appears to change completely as he forgets his grief and is able to move on very quickly after being presented the money from the jewelry he sold.
Knowing how she feels he surprises her with a ticket to the ball. He gives her his savings in order for her to buy a new gown. Though he was unable to get her any jewels he suggests her to tell her rich friend to let her borrow a necklaces in order to see his wife happy. On the contrary, the husband from "The Jewel" does not fully satisfy his wife in the way that she wanted. He dreads going out to the opera while his wife loves it. He was also unable to buy her luxurious jewels so she pleases herself with false jewels and ornaments. Though both men adore and love their wife, one tries harder than the other, even though neither one can afford paying the objects the ladies truly desire.
But her loving husband offers her the hard earned money he had been saving up so she can treat herself to a brand new dress for the party. Her actions are centered around the happiness of herself, and have no good intentions towards her husband or her marriage, resulting unfortunately by portraying her true colors of being greedy and unappreciative of the little money her family had. With her new dress and her borrowed diamond necklace, her appearance matches the reality of her life for the first time.... ... middle of paper ...
Never accept anything and you will never be disappointed. The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant is translated from French to English by John Siscoe.This story , as the title suggests, focuses on the necklace. As the necklace is given the symbolism of wealth , royalty, friendship, self respect and at last an ornament. Mathilde Loisel, young and married, has felt that she has attracted men at the ball and has relieved her wish of being rich by wearing dresses and a “diamond” necklace. This story has situational Irony. To mathilde the necklace was suppose to be one night thing ; ironically necklace takes a decade of her life.
The Necklace also displays distinctive realism in the use of socioeconomic influences which are essential to the plot. The major conflict in the story would be absent and the theme would not be obtainable without Mathilde Loisel’s insecurity about her own socioeconomic reputation. An example of Loisel’s self-deprivation nature is presented when she realizes she does not have a necklace, she says “I shall look absolutely no one. I would almost rather not go to the party” (Maupassant, sec. 3). Another example of the self-conflict caused by social pressure is Loisel’s immediate attempt to replace the necklace and her reluctance to speak to her friend Madame Forestier about the necklace for ten whole years. If she were not conflicted by societal pressures she might have avoided the whole situation altogether. The Necklace establishes a realistic difference in value between the necklaces and proposed clothing. Her husband proposes flowers which were valued 10 franks so in any case if she had chosen the flowers there would have been an insignificant economic loss. Her decision not to tell her friend about the necklace ends up costing her seven times the worth of the original. The roses symbolize the simpler things in life to the theme of the story. Mathilde Loisel’s withered appearance at the end
This story is about Matilda and her husband. Matilda receives an invitation to attend to a party, but she has no jewelry to wear, so she borrows one from a rich friend. Unfortunately, Matilda loses the necklace at the party and has to buy a new one worth thirty-five thousand francs. She works for years to repay all the money she borrowed, but when she finally gets all the money, she finds out the necklace was worth “No more than five hundred francs.” This story has two unexpected twists in it: she loses the necklace and she works for years to pay it off, only to find out it is less than one sixth of what she paid. How Matilda deals with finding out the price is left to the reader’s imagination, but it shows that when Matilda loses the necklace she deals with it relatively calmly, borrowing money to buy a new one and later working for years to pay it
In the short story “The Necklace”, the main character, Loisel, is a woman who dreams of greater things in her life. She is married to a poor clerk who tries his best to make her happy no matter what. In an attempt to try to bring happiness to his wife, he manages to get two invitations to a very classy ball, but even in light of this Loisel is still unhappy. Even when she gets a new dress she is still unhappy. This lasts until her husband suggests she borrows some jewelry from a friend, and upon doing so she is finally happy. Once the ball is over, and they reach home, Loisel has the horrible realization that she has lost the necklace, and after ten years of hard labor and suffering, they pay off debts incurred to get a replacement. The central idea of this story is how something small can have a life changing effect on our and others life’s. This idea is presented through internal and external conflicts, third person omniscient point of view, and the round-dynamic character of Loisel. The third person limited omniscient point-of-view is prevalent throughout this short story in the way that the author lets the reader only see into the main character’s thoughts. Loisel is revealed to the reader as being unhappy with her life and wishing for fancier things. “She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries.” (de Maupassant 887) When her husband tries to fancy things up, “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry which peopled the walls…” (de Maupassant 887) As the story goes on her point of view changes, as she “now knew the horrible existence of the needy. She took her part, moreover all of a sudden, with heroism.” (de Maupassant 891) Having the accountability to know that the “dreadful debt must be paid.” (de Maupassant 891 ) This point-of-view is used to help the reader gain more insight to how Loisel’s whole mindset is changed throughout her struggle to pay off their debts. Maupassant only reveals the thoughts and feelings of these this main character leaving all the others as flat characters. Loisel is a round-dynamic character in that Maupassant shows how she thought she was born in the wrong “station”. “She dressed plainly because she could not dress well, but she was as unhappy as though she had really fallen from her proper station.
She borrows a beautiful necklace from a friend.The necklace is lost after the party. Poor Monsieur Loisel goes out alone and searches all night and day for the jewels but has no luck. Loisel comes up with a plan to buy another necklace and return it to Mathilde's friend.This is quite a man. He takes his inheritance from his father; then, he borrows the rest of the money. They return the necklace. But that is just the beginning. For the next ten years, the Loisels work together to pay for the replacement necklace. Monsieur Loisel works a second job at night. They even give up their apartment. Both of them age tremendously over the years. Mathilde is no longer beautiful. She has hardened:She came to know the heavy work of the house, the hateful duties of the kitchen. She washed the dirty linen, the shirts and dish-cloths, and hung them out to dry on a string; every morning she carried up the water.The author never lets the reader know if Mathilde appreciated her husband for taking care of her. They did accomplish something together, and she did rise to the occasion and do the hard work of the home. In reality, the hero of the story is Monsieur Loisel who worked alongside his wife to pay back the money for
In so many ways society impacts our lives and put perceptions on how everyone should look and act. Everyday everyone, including myself, looks at these perceptions and cannot help but take something from them. I always try to keep my identity unique and cherish my values but every now and then it seems like I have changed. In someway that is always true but it is hard not to wonder how much change was due to social standards.
Lantin become a betrayer, which leads her to exchange her body and allegiance for expensive jewelry. M. Lantin often advises his wife to pick up herself with natural beauty and her own charm instead of the fake jewelry, but his wife isn’t in favor of his kindly suggestions. She loves jewelry very much (par.9). From Mrs. Lantin’s attitude, she is a vanity woman and likes pursuing material comforts. It’s hard to change her nature. Therefore, she is willing to become another man’s mistress so that she can get a lot of jewelry to flatter her vanity. However, Mrs. Lantin doesn’t dare to tell a truth that her jewelry is real. Sometimes, Mrs. Lantin takes out false jewelry to examine and appreciate it with passion and circumspection, as though she undergoes private delight; and she always takes a pleasure in putting a necklace round M. Lantin’s neck (par. 12). The plot of Mrs. Lantin appreciating jewelry profoundly delineates that she can obtain gratification as long as enjoying her jewelry. This is a forceful irony that Mrs. Lantin openly shows up jewelry and recalls sweet memories of her lover. Although Mrs. Lantin cheats on her husband, she doesn’t look guilty at all. Maybe it’s more important for her to gratify her vanity. But on the contrary, M. Lantin really loves Mrs. Lantin. His love is so obvious that his hair turns white in a month because of Mrs. Lantin’s death. However, their marriage has been destroyed by the betrayal, vanity and
During my entire life of seventeen years there have been many important things and people in my life that make me the person I am today. Of course, I can mention that friends have been important and some teachers I had over the years that motivated me, and other things like materialistic things that have important to me, but none compare to my family. Many people say that family is important even though it might sound a little cliché. They truly have been there all my life which is why I consider them to be an important part of life, and they not only helped or are helping me, but also my siblings. They have motivated me even though it seemed like they weren’t it was indirectly in many manners, they talk to me when I have a problem; which obviously I can do with a friend, but you know for sure you can trust your parents over your friends. There are many people who neglect their parents like if they were just some other person on this earth that they have to put up with the best if their life. My questions is , How much importance does your parents or who veer took care of you have importance on your life know and in the future where you become more mature then in your current state.