Every system is different when it comes to juveniles and adults. As for juveniles things are a little bit more lenient when it comes to punishment . Many states concede a juvenile to be between certain ages. Also some states set the minimum age for juveniles as sixteen. Anyone over a state's given age limit is tried as an adult which many children should try to avoid. Sometimes older juveniles who commit serious crimes are tried as adults, even though they would be considered juveniles. The courts use different terms for juvenile offenders than for adult offenders! Such as delinquents and criminals etc. States handle things differently from the age and to the crime . Juvenile cases are handled privately where no public is allowed but cameras and media is allowed in the court room . I …show more content…
We all watch the news and people always make their judgements about others . With adults they have to be legally arrested by an officer which proceeds them to being in court for the decision wether they are guilty or not guilty . The decisions are made by the judge and the jury which are people who are chosen and they are like everyday citizens . The lawyers job is to get these few people to see that you are innocent whether you really are or not . If he doesn't then the adult will be told by the judge that they are guilty and a sentence will be made . Also with adults the state files a formal criminal charges in the form of an incident information or complaint . The goal of the criminal justice system for adults is for them to punish adults who commits crime but not all people who they say have committed a crime is guilty . Many people have went to jail and they were innocent . In adult court it doesn't matter if your it all comes down to what can be proven if it can't then your guilty and that's how our justice system has always been
According to criminal.findlaw.com the definition of the juvenile justice system is the area of criminal law applicable to people not old enough to be held responsible for criminal acts. Juveniles are people 17 and under. Juveniles should be convicted as adults for violent crimes like assault or murder etcetera because if they can commit an adult crime they should get an adult punishment. Also if juveniles don’t get punished for their crimes then they’ll keep doing it because they got off unpunished the first time.
There are times where a juvenile may be eligible for transfer to adult criminal court. There are certain criteria that must be met for this to happen, and there is a strong belief that juveniles who commit serious offenses would be more appropriately dealt with by criminal (or adult) courts (Elrod & Ryder, 2011). Juveniles are capable of committing the same serious offenses that adults do. Therefore, with the requirements of a transfer being met, there are times that juveniles should be placed in the adult criminal court system and tried through here, rather than the juvenile court system. The juvenile court system may not have the same consequences or sentencing guidelines as the adult criminal court; therefore, the proper punishment may not be served if a juvenile is not transferred to the adult criminal court system.
Thousands of kid criminals in the United States have been tried as adults and sent to prison (Equal Justice Initiative). The debate whether these kids should be tried as adults is a huge controversy. The decision to try them or to not try them as an adult can change their whole life. “Fourteen states have no minimum age for trying children as adults” (Equal Justice Initiative). Some people feel that children are too immature to fully understand the severity of their actions. People who are for kids to be tried as adults feel that if they are old enough to commit the crime, then they are old enough to understand what they are doing. There are people who feel that children should only be tried as adults depending on the crime.
There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes. In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative views. For example, teens that are detained can provide information about other crimes, can have an impact in social conditions, and serve as experience; however, it can be negative because teens are still not mature enough for that experience, they are exposed to adult criminals; and they will lose out on getting an education.
In juvenile court, the judge must decide if the teen gets tried as an adult or minor. If the juvenile gets sent to a juvenile detention center for murder they will live their lives there until they are twenty one, but if tried as an adult they will serve so many years in prison. There is a grey area of law for certain teens that commit serious crimes. In this case of the grey law, each state gets to decide upon the particular state how they person is tried. For most cases pertaining to the juvenile courts are case by case bases. Many believe that it isn’t fair for the teens to be locked up with adults. The U.S. House of Representatives made the Juvenile Justice Act encouraging states to find alternatives to having the teens go through such a process with people much older than themselves (Locked Up…).
In conclusion, juvenile offenders should be tried as adults. Adult classification enables the judicial system to punish offenders to the fullest extent of the law. Juveniles should be held responsible for their actions because they have values and morals and are able to realize consequences just as well as adults. The tougher punishments given by adult courts discourage other young people from committing crimes and help to keep society safer fro everyone. Justice is served for criminal and victim when the punishment allowed by adult courts compensates for the crime committed. When juveniles are tried as adults in the criminal justice program, society as a whole benefits.
In today’s society it is not who or whom it is what. Juvenile offenders are now facing a two court system, not only can they be tried in juvenile court for a crime committed. They are now being charged as adults in adult court. Charging a juvenile as an adult has stirred up ...
Lastly they know they can get off as children so they will test the system before they're 18. Juveniles with multiple offences should be tried as adults because if you can drive at 16 you can commit a crime. Juvenile offenders should be tried as adults for multiple reasons but a main reason would be rehabilitation doesn't work on teens like it should. Rehab doesn't work because they usually end up back in jail right after. Changes made to most states.
Adult Justice Does no Justice Since its founding, the juvenile justice system has been at war with itself. Originally conceived as a fatherly entity intervening in the lives of troubled youths, it has since transformed into a rigid and adversarial arena restrained by the demands of personal liberty and due process. As a result, there is a great deal of controversy revolving around the trying and sentencing of juvenile offenders today, especially when they commit heinous, “adult crimes” like murder. Children make mistakes and adults make mistakes, but it is necessary to understand that there are substantial differences between children and adults mentally, emotionally and biologically. The criminal and juvenile justice systems are separated
When discussing who has the power when it is time to decide whether a juvenile will be processed in adult court, there are a few important people in the justice system that decide those facts. The prosecution is the first to make a ruling on how someone should be tried. Since they are the first line of sentencing for all defendant they get to decide what sentence is the correct one. This can become dangerous when the prosecution pursues the harshest of sentences without consideration to the age of the defendant. The second most influential party in the process is the juvenile’s parent(s).
One reason why juvenile offenders should not be tried as adult is because they are far from adulthood. Many teenager who have committed a crime has a different background. For example, they have suffered sex abused, their parents have been drug addicted , or have been in prison for many years. There are many factors
Minors are committing crimes all the time, some of which it is questionable to try them as adults. Whether they are violent crimes or not, minors should not be tried as adults. Research has shown that children who are prosecuted in the adult court system are more likely to commit a crime again than those being prosecuted in juvenile (“Children”). Crimes are meant to be stopped, not meant to be committed again. If the same crimes are being committed, then nothing has changed.
The youngest suspect, who is 13, remains in the juvenile court system. Juveniles and adults commit crimes, but the brains of each respond differently to punishment. A distinguished professor of psychology at Temple University, believes for a reason that we should treat juveniles and adults differently when it comes to sentencing. Reasons for that are even though young juveniles are committing something alike as adults, they are much inherently less responsible for their actions.
According to the Vanderbilt Law School article, a quote states, "Old enough to do the crime, old enough to do the time. " This quote explains that minors who commit serious crimes are aware of their actions and should be tried as an adult while receiving an adult punishment. Although minors have more of a “risk-taking” attitude and have a higher percentage of doing these crimes, they have the same brains as adults and a few years of age does not make a huge difference when committing such a horrendous crime. Since this is not apparent in the U.S justice system, minors are able to get away with extreme crimes with only a slight consequence. This is because it is said that they have a higher chance of committing more rash acts than adults.