Why Is Sherlock Holmes Guilty For Killing Dr. Roylott

Sherlock Holmes was not guilty for killing Dr. Roylott at the Stoke Moran. The mystery story “The Speckled Band”, written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, has numerous pieces of evidence that prove this point. Sherlock Holmes was certain that Dr. Roylott had a plot to kill Julia; if he had not died, he would have been sent to prison for quite a long time. Furthermore, Sherlock Holmes had to protect himself from the swamp adder’s numerous threats. Lastly, there was no possible way that Sherlock Holmes could have known where Dr. Roylott was in his room. By observing his surroundings, Sherlock Holmes was able to make a detailed conclusion about Dr. Roylott’s immoral plans.

When distressed and weary Helen Stoner came to Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson exclaiming her fright about her stepfather, Dr. Roylott, Sherlock Holmes could tell that the situation’s circumstances were extreme. He traveled with his assistant to examine Helen’s bedroom. With the previous knowledge he had gained from Miss Stoner’s tale of her sister’s death combined with the evidence before him, Sherlock Holmes was able to conclude the following: that Dr. Roylott had murdered Julia Stoner and was plotting to kill Helen as well. Sherlock Holmes knew that should Dr. Roylott be sent to court, he would be found

guilty and possibly killed anyway. Not only was Sherlock Holmes innocently solving the crime, he was protecting himself as well.
When Dr. Roylott sent the swamp adder to Helen’s bedchamber, he expected her to be in the bed; however, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson were there instead. As the slivering snake swept into the bed, Sherlock Holmes was fortunate enough to see it in time to protect himself. As he swung at the creature, he cried out to Dr. Watson, asking if he could see the animal. Sherlock Holmes was attempting to defend himself and Dr. Watson from the poisonous snake’s venom. He had to be sure that he would be able to live and explain his conclusion fully to Miss Stoner. This, and his reputation, drove him to striking the serpent. Not once did Sherlock Holmes intend to kill Dr. Roylott, or even consider the thought. He was absorbed into a situation between life and death, doing his best to survive. It was impossible for him to see where Dr. Roylott was in his bedroom, and send the reptile back to his master with the intention of killing him.
When you consider the structure of the Stoke Moran, it is obvious to say that there are walls separating the room, with no possible way of seeing through them.

This common knowledge makes it clear: Sherlock Holmes could not have seen where Dr. Roylott was in his separate room. There were many locations that Dr. Roylott could have been in when the snake returned, making it impossible for Sherlock Holmes to know exactly where Dr. Roylott would be located. In the end, it was Dr. Roylott’s decision to seat in the chair below the ventilator. It was his choice to have the serpent attack him at that location, not Sherlock Holmes’. This justifies the knowledge that Sherlock Holmes was innocent in this

crime.
Sherlock Holmes was not guilty for Dr. Roylott’s death. Sherlock Holmes was keen enough to discover what plot Dr. Roylott was up to and stop it. He was in a state of self-defense when the snake attacked him, with no intention to kill Dr. Roylott. Finally, it was impossible for Sherlock Holmes to be able to pin point precisely where Dr. Roylott was positioned. He was a good and honest detective who never meant to harm Dr. Roylott; nevertheless, he did intend to have Dr. Roylott imprisoned for murdering Julia Stoner and attempted murder to Helen Stoner. On the contrary, killing and capturing a man are two very different things and have a variety of purposes behind them. Since Sherlock Holmes was trying to maintain criminal justice, he had pure and moral purposes. Sherlock Holmes was a detective who was thought to have killed Dr. Roylott, which was dissimilar to the truth.