Why Is Plea Barging Important

263 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Plea bargaining quizlet

Often court cases our resolved by using a plea barging: the act of pleading guilty to lower their sentence or being convicted of a higher crime. The catch to plea bargaining is that have to surrender some of your rights. The rights you have to surrender include; right to trail with counsel, right to test the state’s evidence, right to call a witness, right to testify or remain silent, and the right to an appeal. I believe plea barging is worth the loss of rights when you are convicted of crimes like drug possession, they can lower your sentence and/or lower the severity of the crime. However, with a crime like murder, pleading guilty probably will not do much because the sentence is usually a life sentence and there is not much a court can

Show More
Related

  • Courtroom 302 Chapter 1 Summary

    1110 Words  | 3 Pages

    Steve Bogira, a prizewinning writer, spent a year observing Chicago's Cook County Criminal Courthouse. The author focuses on two main issues, the death penalty and innocent defendants who are getting convicted by the pressure of plea bargains, which will be the focus of this review. The book tells many different stories that are told by defendants, prosecutors, a judge, clerks, and jurors; all the people who are being affected and contributing to the miscarriage of justice in today’s courtrooms.

    Read More

  • R V. Rogerson And Mcnamara Case Analysis

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plea bargaining precludes justice from being achieved, where the consent to less severe sentences are given in favour of time and money. The case of R v Rogerson and McNamara, demonstrates the advantages of hiring highly trained legal personnel, which inevitably contributed to their lesser sentence. Thus, making it more difficult for offenders to be convicted.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

    645 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...instead of 25 years if they pleaded guilty. (Wan 37) In addition, money can become a reason for defense attorney to encourage pleading guilty. Private defense attorney may want to spend more effort in cases where they have more possibility of winning and thus getting more money, and public defenders find pleading guilty an effective way to move through cases quicker. (Mohr 6) For prosecutors, “guilty pleas avoided ‘onerous and protracted’ trials whose outcomes – ‘losing’ or ‘having to oppose an appeal to the higher courts’ – were both undesirable.” (Smith 134) Finally for judges, plea bargain reduces their caseload, and elevates their reputation indirectly because accepting a plea bargaining also includes waiver of appeal to higher courts. (Mohr 6)

    Read More

  • The Use of the Peremptory Challenge in the U.S. Legal System

    2601 Words  | 6 Pages

    Over 80 million Americans alive today have been called to jury duty at some point in their lives (Henley 5). Out of these 80 million individuals, roughly 30% (or 24 million) have been eliminated from the jury selection process due to the use of peremptory challenges (5). According to Black’s Law Dictionary, a peremptory challenge is a challenge that “need not be supported by any reason.” Although these challenges are commonplace in today’s courts, several Supreme Court cases have questioned the constitutionality of their place in the legal system. This paper will explore the history of peremptory challenges, theories behind them, a few pertinent cases, and reform progress.

    Read More

  • Paton And Thomas Vs. Supreme Court Case Study

    586 Words  | 2 Pages

    I have learned that some cases go to trial pretty fast and then others take longer. I found that people can wait up to 9 years for trial and they still get convicted as guilty, but there are some that get their cases dismissed. Which is far because it did violated the right to speedy trial so which mean the case gets dismissed.

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Plea Bargaining Pros And Cons

    1083 Words  | 3 Pages

    The vast majority of criminal cases in the United States, the accused pleads guilty and no trial takes place (Siegel,

    Read More

  • The Criminal Trial Process

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.

    Read More

  • Should Plea Bargaining be Abolished?

    2271 Words  | 5 Pages

    One could wonder why plea bargains are even made. One reason would be that criminal courts are becoming clogged and overcrowded. Going through the proper procedure and processes that we are granted takes time. Trials can take anywhere from days to...

    Read More

  • Furman V. Georgia Case Study

    808 Words  | 2 Pages

    These guidelines allowed for the introduction of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in determining to sentence. The Court also held that the death penalty itself was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment. Mitigating factors is evidence the defense can present in the sentencing phase of a trial to provide reasons why there is a possibility that the defendant excused from the death penalty. This evidence can include mental illness, guilt, age, childhood abuse, a minor role in a murder, or no prior criminal record; the culpability may decrease if the defendant provides other reasons for taking a life sentence instead of the death penalty. The jury may consider any mitigating evidence a juror finds

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Plea Bargains

    933 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the War on Drugs began, plea bargains were declared constitutional and had to be regularly used to deal with the sudden stress on the legal system (Berger). The courts, prosecutors, and public defenders couldn 't handle the sheer amount of cases; they now had to deal with by allowing them to go to trial. Once plea bargains were made constitutional, it began to impact the very foundations of the Justice System and those who work on it in several ways. Frankly, it 's my belief that career criminals or those who have committed serious offenses should not be allowed to make an appeal. Crimes like murder, theft of large amounts of money or assault cases should not be allowed to go to a plea bargain. On the other hand, first-time offenders, petty criminals and individuals who are in cases with circumstantial evidence should be allowed to plea. Plea bargaining, on the whole, greatly benefits the prosecutor and the Justice System. Also, it allows for the massive backlog of cases to be alleviated through other means and saves the government a lot of time, stress and taxpayer funds that can be used for more useful and relevant matters (Langden). Plea bargaining also greatly benefits the guilty. It allows for them to reduce the sentences and change what type of charge is left on their record. What a person ultimately found guilty of will have repercussions and having a lesser charge on their records can make a huge difference in their lives (Bernman). The difference between a misdemeanor and felony for some people is the difference between employed and

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishment

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    Cases end up in life sentences in jail. The goal is to end all cases, for murdering someone, to life sentences.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty is an Acceptable Form of Punishment

    2325 Words  | 5 Pages

    As the case of Charles Manson proves, a death penalty case is never simple. There are many factors and legal technicalities to consider. When a jury looks at a death penalty case, they must consider the burden of proof, the laws of the particular state, the presentations of the prosecution and defense, the testimony of the witnesses, and the motive of the accused. From the States side, the prosecutor mainly considers the atrocity of the crime and the mental state of the accused when deciding whether to seek the death penalty. The defense usually tries to get the jury to believe that the death penalty is inhumane and is not a deterrent to ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Criminal Justice: Nothing Cuts Deeper

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    If most cases went to trial, the likelihood of the accused posting bail or the judge releasing the accused on their own recognizance is seldom therefore, jails would be crowded with individuals awaiting court dates. According to an article "Why Innocent People Plead Guilty" by Jed S. Rakoff "In 2013, while 8 percent of all federal criminal charges were dismissed (either because of a mistake in fact or law or because the defendant had decided to cooperate), more than 97 percent of the remainder were resolved through plea bargains, and fewer than 3 percent went to trial." This is infringing people 's right based on the sixth

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Death Penalty

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    Great effort has been made in our criminal justice system in pretrial, trial, appeals, writ and clemency procedures to minimize the chance of and innocent person being convicted and sentenced to death. Since 1973, legal protections have been so great that 37 percent of all death row cases have been overturned for due process reasons or commuted. Inmates are six times more likely to get off death row by appeals than by execution.

    Read More

  • Importance Of Rule Of Law

    1501 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Rule of Law means that the state should govern its citizens, in a way which works with the rules that have been agreed on. The Rule of Law is simply a fundamental principle of our constitution. Britain and other Western democracies are different in that Britain has an unwritten constitution, meaning that our constitution is not found in a certain document but that we actually have a constitution from the rules about who governs it, and about the powers they entail and how that power can be passed or even transferred. The Constitution includes; Acts of Parliament, Judicial decisions and Conventions.There are three main principles around the Rule of Law being the separation of powers, the supremacy of Parliament and the Rule of Law. The

    Read More

More about Why Is Plea Barging Important

Open Document