Furman V. Georgia Case Study

808 Words2 Pages

As controversial as the death penalty was and could still be, there was a period between 1972-1976 in which death penalty came to a halt. This pause was better known as a moratorium, a legally approved period of delay.
The US Supreme Court decisions involved in moratorium were all in regards to the Furman v. Georgia case of 1972. Furman was robbing a home when a family member discovered him, and as he attempted to flee, he tumbled and collapsed. The firearm that he was carrying went off and killed a resident of the home. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. Two other death sentence cases chosen along with Furman was Jackson v. Georgia and Branch v. Texas. These cases had to do with whether or not there was accordance with the Constitution over the death punishment/time spent for crimes such as rape and murder.
Therefore, with the Furman decision, the Supreme Court set the standard that a punishment would be "cruel and unusual" if it was too extreme and did not fit the crime, offended the community of people’s sense of justice, or it if was not more effective than a less risky penalty.
The Court held that Georgia's death penalty statute, due to …show more content…

These guidelines allowed for the introduction of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in determining to sentence. The Court also held that the death penalty itself was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment. Mitigating factors is evidence the defense can present in the sentencing phase of a trial to provide reasons why there is a possibility that the defendant excused from the death penalty. This evidence can include mental illness, guilt, age, childhood abuse, a minor role in a murder, or no prior criminal record; the culpability may decrease if the defendant provides other reasons for taking a life sentence instead of the death penalty. The jury may consider any mitigating evidence a juror finds

Open Document