Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The two lives of charlemagne review
The two lives of charlemagne review
The two lives of charlemagne review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The two lives of charlemagne review
Works Cited
"Charlemagne." Encyclopidia.com, 2004, https://www.encyclopidia.com/people/history/frenchhistory-biographies/charlemagne. Accessed 4/25/18.
"Charlemagne." History.com, https://www.history.com/topics/charlemagne. Accessed 4/25/18.
"Charlemagne Holly Roman Emperor." Britannica.com https://www.britannica.com/biography/charlemagne/Emperor-of-the-Romans. Accessed 4/25/18
“Right action is better than knowledge; but in order to do what is right, we must know what is right.”-Charlemagne. He was one of the first kings of France and is generally viewed as one of the first modern Kings. Conquering most of Europe and some of Africa with charisma and strategy, Charlemagne was one of the best kings in history.
The year was 742, modern day Austria the first king of the Franks, Pepin
…show more content…
This would help him greatly in conquering Europe in the years to come (Charlemagne 2.) On December 25, 800 Charlemagne became the Holy Roman Empire (Charlemagne 1.)
Charlemagne was perfectly healthy until the last four years of his life. At this time developed a limp and a severe cough. His doctors on constant watch of him, would always tell him to eat boiled meat instead of roasting it, but he loved eating roasted meat that much. He would always listen to his council before his doctors. Once at the end of his life, Charlemagne made one of his sons co-emperor and spread his other sons out to rule across Europe to rule their own land (Charlemagne 2)
On 814 January 28 Charlemagne died of natural causes in modern day Germany where he was buried. Thousands of years after he died Charlemagne became a "saint" for his partridge to the Church, but still is not formally recognized in the catholic church (Charlemagne 1). It's amazing how after thousands of years he is still recognized as one of the greatest
The collection Two Lives of Charlemagne contains two different biographies of Charlemagne who was a king of the Franks and a christian emperor of the West in the 8th century. The first biographical account was written by his courtier Einhard who knew him personally and well. On the other hand, the second account was penned by Notker the Stammerer was born twenty-five years after the king’s death. Even though these two versions indicate the same king’s life, there were many differences between the two. Einhard’s writing focused on the emperor’s official life and his military campaign. However, Notker provided more of a perspective about the king’s legacy and seemed more hyperbolic as well as mythical. This paper will compare and contrast the
He will travel to church every so often to maintain a close relationship with the pope. This is not the only detail that provides that he did more than just this for the Christian faith. Charlemagne, according to Notker, wanted to set an example of what a good Christian person is. Like taking food during Lent and doing certain processes in order that he does not break the fasting code (). Charlemagne is described with many adjectives of his behavior. Einhard and Notker seem to both establish he is a man that did care for the nature of his kingdom. It is noted that Einhard elaborates more on the personal life of Charlemagne. Einhard personally knew the family of Charlemagne. Notker on the other hand, often mentions people that Charlemagne appointed during his reign.
The most famous work about Charlemagne is a book entitled The Two Lives of Charlemagne which consists of two separate biographies published into one book and tells the story of Charlemagne's life as two different people experienced it. Apart from this, there are many other places you can turn to learn more about the life of the king of the Franks, including letters, capitularies, inventories, annals, and more. However, each of these sources seem to paint a different picture of Charlemagne. In one, he seems to be a very average guy; in another, a mythical being, almost god-like; and a strong and firm political leader in yet another. It is because of this of this that we will never really know exactly who Charlemagne was or what he was like, but we do have an idea of what he did and how he lived thanks to those who decided to preserve it.
... The church too performed many personal functions for Charlemagne of a less-than-political nature, including his last rites, the care of his sister in her convent, and his own burial. The church also acted as a kind of legal authority, witnessing his inheritance arrangements.
After reading two versions of “The Life of Charlemagne”, one written by a person who lived with Charlemagne, and one who didn’t, it is evident that Charlemagne is portrayed in a negative way by the author, the Monk of St. Gall, and in a positive way by Einhard. Einhard was very close to Charlemagne. He lived at the same time and with Charlemagne himself. His version of “The Life of Charlemagne” was writing right after his death. The Monk of St. Gall wrote his version more than 70 years after Charlemagne’s death. He did not live with or even at the same time as Charlemagne. This is probably one of the reasons the view on the ruler are completely different.
The two lives of Charlemagne as told by Einhard and Notker are two medieval sources about the accounts of the life Charlemagne. Modern sources by Matthew Innes and Rosamond Mckitterick discuss how history was recorded during the medieval period and how it was suppose to be viewed in the early ages. Observing each of these sources helps get an understanding of how the writing of history is important in recorded history and how it affected how the history of Charlemagne was recorded.
Charlemagne’s father, Pepin, died of dropsy on 24 September, 768 and left his two sons, Charlemagne and Carloman, with William, the Duke of Aquitania. After Pepin died, the whole kingdom was divided evenly between the two sons. It was split in such a way that Charlemagne would govern the part that belonged ...
Charlemagne’s reign before his death was also an important event in the shaping of Europe. Charlemagne (768 -814) also known as “Charles the Great” would raid Italy and capture the Lombard crown adding Northern Italy in 774. He would fight the Saxon’s for over thirty years expanding his territory along the way. The emperor would aggressively convert foreigners after conquering their territory into Christianity. By 800, he extended his territory into the Western and Central regions of Europe. The Carolingian King would create institutions that would mirror the old Roman Empire and set up districts under an appointed authority called a “count” similar to a modern governor.
Of all the absolute rulers in European history, Louis XIV of France was the most powerful, and the best example because of his successes, being able to continue his complete control even after failures, his ability to be able to use France’s money in any way he wanted, such as the Place of Versailles, taking away the nobles power, and his ability to delegate impotant jobs to smart yet loyal people.
On December 25, 800, Charlemagne was crowned Holy Roman Emperor by Pope Leo the Third in the St. Peter’s Cathedral in Rome. Charlemagne died in 814, and was succeeded by his only remaining son, Louis the Pious. Louis the Pious reigned as Holy Roman Emperor from 814-840. When he assumed the throne, he quickly replaced administers within the palace. Louis the Pious had three sons: Lothar, Charles the Bald, and Louis the German.
Charlemagne Charlemagne, also known as Charles the Great, became the undisputed ruler of Western Europe, “By the sword and the cross.” (Compton’s 346) As Western Europe was deteriorating Charlemagne was crowned the privilege of being joint king of the Franks in 768 A.D. People of Western Europe, excluding the church followers, had all but forgotten the great gifts of education and arts that they had possessed at one time. Charlemagne solidly defeated barbarians and kings in identical fashion during his reign. Using the re-establishment of education and order, Charlemagne was able to save many political rights and restore culture in Western Europe.
The Western Roman Empire was constantly in chaos and could not firmly establish an undisputed government. When it fell, in 476 AD, the civilization had no central government to act as a backbone. It was ruled by the Pope, who appointed Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, as emperor in 800 AD. This event led to the transformation of the civilization into the Holy Roman Empire. This lasted unti...
Charlemagne began his unification of Christianity by establishing orthodoxy through ecclesiastic synodi.5 Before Charlemagne was born, the Frankish church had not held a council for over 80 years.6 In the period of 80 years, churches began to drift apart in their common practices, creating disunity among the Frankish ...
When Charles was six he started military training. At the age of fifteen his father allowed him to be the overlordship in Austrasian. When his father died in 768, the empire was divided between him and his brother. The Charlemagne learned how to be an Emperor because he watched how his father led the Franks. It was in 741, that Charlemagne got to be a leader, but he was not the only Carolingian leader. The land was split between him an...
Tiberius Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus was a mighty ruler who was well-liked by his people. His achievements include, Invading Britain, Annexation of Jews, ridding Rome of a corrupt system, and so much more. He was the most influential and powerful Emperors, who should nothing but braveness, and loyalty to Rome.