Why Guns Should Be Banned Research Paper

745 Words2 Pages

In her article, “Second thoughts on the Second Amendment”, Wendy Kaminer states that there are roughly 200 million firearms in circulation(Kaminer).
Whether or not firearms should be banned is a highly discussed topic among many people from all over the country.
The U.S. must deal with gun-related crime everyday. The founding fathers were never opposed to regulating guns(Cornell). Gun regulation is not focused on any particular state.
Guns laws are an important topic because many people have different perspectives on this topic.
BODY PARAGRAPH 1
The history of the right to bear arms, whether it should be removed from the constitution or not, is very controversial.
Guns are neither good nor bad. They are just tools.
In his article, “People Not Guns, Are the Problem”, Craig Medred states that in 2005, 43,000 people were killed in motor-vehicle accidents. In that same year 30,000 people …show more content…

In the end, it’s basically up to the people to determine if guns do more good than bad.
BODY PARAGRAPH 2
On the other hand, some people believe that banning guns would actually help America.
The people who think guns should be banned think this because they want their children to live in a world where they don’t have to worry about being shot on the street.
“Even if a drastic reduction in the number of guns wouldn’t necessarily decrease crime, it would decrease fatalities”(Kaminer).
The number of deaths would decrease drastically if guns were banned.
If guns were banned, there would no longer be gun related crimes and there would be a substantial decrease in firearm related deaths.
Some people however, feel that taking away guns would not do anything.
“Don Kates speculates that magically reducing the approximately 200 million firearms in circulation to 5 million would have virtually no reductive effect on the crime

Open Document