Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Consequences of gun control
Opposing viewpoints of gun control
Opposing viewpoints of gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Consequences of gun control
Guns are very helpful tools that have helped the world as a whole develop. Guns have shaped the world as we know it today. Guns have caused many problems, good and bad. Guns help us defend us and hunt, but they also hurt and sometimes kill people. But to me it's not the guns fault, it is the handler's fault. A gun can’t just stand up and walk to a school and start a school shooting. Somebody has to put ammo in to that gun, someone has to take that gun off safety. Everybody says that if we take away guns crime rates will go down. I completely disagree with that statement. By definition a criminal is someone who doesn’t follow the law. So what's to stop a criminal from breaking the law to get a gun to do something bad with it. It’s whoever is …show more content…
Guns help protect ourselves and others from somebody wishing to do harm. If guns are taken away, we have no way to defend ourselves. If somebody were to pull a weapon on you and you have a concealed weapon permit to carry a handgun and you have that on you, you have the right to defend yourself.”The argument asserts that gun control would violate a right to defend oneself as one sees fit”(Degrazia). Another good thing from guns is that you use then to go hunting. You can hunt anything from small game like pheasants, squirrels, rabbits and more. Or you can hunt big game like deer elk or antelope. You can now even trophy hunt which, is more along the line of lions, bears, coyotes animals like that. Some people hunt as a way to survive in secluded areas. Yes some take it as killing an innocent animal, but others see it as a time to go out with family and friends and have a good time. I know when I go out pheasant hunting it’s usually the one time I get to see some good friends and to have fun with them. We even have traditions that we do when hunting. So yes it takes the life of an animal, but we are like the predators and they are our prey and we need their meat from them to survive. If guns are taken away and people can’t hunt how are people supposed to survive. Not every wants to live off of vegetables like some people do. I prefer to eat deer sticks or jerky or pheasant breasts any day of the week. Taking away guns will take away some people's lifestyles. Taking away guns will take away
He demonstrates when guns are found in every household, gun control can do little to restrict access to guns from potential criminals. (McMahan, 3) So, McMahan’s main premises comes into play, either everyone has guns, including criminals, or nobody has guns. “Gun advocates prefer for both rather than neither to have them” McMahan remarks, but ultimately that will just leave the country open to more violence and tragedies. “As more private individuals acquire guns, the power of the police declines, personal security becomes a matter of self help, and the unarmed have an incentive to get guns.” (McMahan, 2) Now everyone is armed, and everyone has the ability to kill anyone in an instant, making everyone less secure. Just as all the states would be safer if nobody were to possess the nuclear weapons, our country would be safer if guns were banned from private individuals and criminals.
This nation was built on the right to bear arms, but this freedom is more controversial than ever. With all the school shootings and gun violence in America today at some point it may seem that just too take away all guns may be the answer to this problem. In defense, this is not the answer. If someone wants to commit a crime, gun laws will not stop them from obtaining the weapon. It is like a drug. Drugs are illegal, but every day you see someone either with, on, or recovering from a drug habit. What about for defense right to own guns to protect your family if part of your constitutional rights. Rights that are supposed to be unalienable rights. Although in this day in time, they are always trying to take away guns either by trying to pass laws or taxing guns and ammo which almost makes guns unaffordable for middle class normal American families.
Gun control in the United States has been a major debate for hundreds of years. Many people believe that guns should be highly regulated while others believe that anyone should have the ability to own one. Each side has a plausible argument. Throughout this essay it will be show how not having gun control can increase violence and death rates, the right for everyone to own a gun is not guaranteed by the Second Amendment, and how over usage of guns has played a role in the diminishing populations of animals.
People have questioned gun control long time. Many people wonder if anyone, aside from those who join the law force, should be allowed to carry guns. Benjamin Franklin once said, “Those who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety” (Wright 4). Franklin understood that taking guns away from law-abiding citizens would not uphold their liberty. Some people who argue for gun control state many violent crimes involve guns. Others believe a child could find the gun and something bad could happen to the child or others when a gun is unsafely stored. People who argue against gun control might say there is a huge psychological gap between citizens who shoot to protect themselves or their property and those who go into schools and shoot at others. Criminals will always find a way around gun control laws and will be able to obtain and use guns illegally. The second amendment protects gun rights for individual citizens. Reasonable gun control laws and educational steps can be taken to protect the majority of U.S. citizens. Gun control does not only take guns away from criminals, gun control also limits law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves and their families when necessary.
I have just shown you some right-wing substantial proof on why I think that hunting is foundationally right. I will support the second amendment and the right to hunt ‘til the day I die. Hunting is rooted deep inside in the blood of all people whether we want to admit it or not. It is natural, it is instinctive, and most of all, it is traditional. And by the way… it’s freakin’ fun!!
In America guns have been a part of the country’s society since it’s birth. Throughout history the citizens of the US have used firearms to protect the nation, protect their families, hunt for food and engage in sporting activities. The issue of Guns and gun control is complex. Weighing the rights and liberties of the individual against the welfare and safety of the public has always been a precarious balancing act. In the United States, gun control is one of these tumultuous issues that has both sides firmly entrenched in their positions. Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms, rely on the fact that the provision for such rights is enshrined in their constitution. In this climate of growing violence, rife with turmoil and crime, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the “Land of the Free” possessing a gun is a fundamental right, and may even be a necessity... Anti- gun lobbyists point to the same growing violence and gun related crimes in an effort to call on the government to take action. By enacting more laws and stricter control, these people not in favor of guns feel society would be better safer.
First, hunting can be a source of relaxation. Sitting in the woods with nobody else around, far from the routine life, can be very therapeutic. One’s life is hectic with all the demands of everyday living. Running away from them, and having a time for oneself can be very healthy.” Even If you don’t makea kill , you will benefit from the peace and quiet sounds of nature“(National Geographic News ,March,2007). Moreover, hunting is a good method to rid oneself of pent up anger. Emotions may build up, and anger might fill the mind; hun...
Hunters often reveal that being in nature provides time to clear the mind. In the woods, there is no rush, no schedule, and no deadlines; nature moves at its own pace. This interaction provides a deep spiritual connection with the land, the wildlife, and our planet. Hunting has been around since the beginning of time and has been in many people 's lives for generations, these are some reasons why people all across America continue to hunt. Hunting has many benefits such as reducing deer related car accidents, controlling deer densities in heavily human populated areas, creates jobs, and feeding and supporting families. Thus, deer hunting is necessary for several reasons.
Central in the arguments against gun control is its ability to restrict any citizen of the United States the right to own guns which is protected under the constitution. Specifically, due recognition is made to its connection to the 2nd Amendment wherein it seeks to protect the individual liberties of people. This facet also applies to gun ownership regardless of the original objective and intention. “The second amendment from the Bill of Rights grants private citizens the right to bear arms. Thus, people who stand firmly against gun control insist that no legislation, technically, should have the right to take away a citizen’s guns without first repealing the amendment in question” (Groberman 1). A good approach to consider in highlighting this part comes from depriving the citizen of his basic right on the basis of specific presumption that it would be used for violence or crim...
Nevertheless, guns are very dangerous and they are used in all sorts of criminal activities already. Therefore, the benefits of having a gun outweigh the drawbacks of not having a gun. No matter what each individual’s beliefs are in regard as to whether gun control should or should not be enforced, the Second Amendment of the Constitution gives each person the right to bear
Ultimately, it is a person’s choice to use firearms to commit violent crimes. So criminals should be controlled, not the guns which they share with millions of law-abiding citizens. Gun control supporters claim that gun control lowers crime rate. We as people need to take a stand and fight for our Second Amendment and the right to bear arms. Gun control advocates need to realize that passing laws that honest gun owners will not obey is a self-defeating strategy. Gun owners are not about to surrender their liberties or their right to bear arms. The Federal Govement of the United States should not be able to take away the right of law-abiding citizens to own a gun.
Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.
One thing that i believe in 100 percent is “Why someone hunts is a personal matter. Many do it to spend time outdoors with friends or family. Others hunt to continue a tradition
People who live in the country and around woods use their guns to hunt. If the government decides to take away the rights for hunters to use guns, then many people could starve. Many hunters are dependent on their game for income and to help the local economy. Proven by the journal artical, Effects of Fishing and Hunting Expenditures On A Local Colorado Economy, states, “Colorado’s population is 3600 and the primary economic activities are recreation services and agriculture.” Also, if hunters did not
What's wrong with guns?? Ask yourself is a gun dangerous or is the person dangerous. If you think about it, a gun can't harm anybody without a shooter. Im positive if you looked at guns like that you will never feel the same. People should be able to own these guns because it isn't the gun but the shooter.